chav vs arse midfield

eden hazard , lampard , mata , oscar , ramires , mikel vs  ozil , ramsey , carzola ,flamini ,arteta , wilshere

chelsea mid seems more mature with more winners arsenals are hungry lads who want to achieve success


which midfield gives you more options ? tactically

better defensive organization
fluidity
tenacity
endurance (more than 25 + games still reaming  i guess  )
technical

whos the better player in positions they occupy

hazard vs ozil
mata vs carzola
lamp vs ramsey
oscar vs wilshere
mikel vs arteta
ramires vs flamini

wilian?

ozil>mata
wilshere=hazard
ramsey>oscar
lampard>flamini
arteta>mikel
ramires>carzola

as a team, arse by miles.

Chelsea midfield is horrible. No spine, no balance whatsoever.

Özil > Oscar
Cazorla > Hazard
Walcott > Willian
Ramsey = Ramires
Arteta > Lampard
Mikel > Flamini
Wilshere > van Ginkel
de Bruyne > Chamberlain
Schürrle = Podolski
Mata > Rosicky

Conclusion: Arsenal's first choice midfield > Chelsea's first choice midfield, Chelsea's midfield depth > Arsenal's midfield depth

Ozil>Oscar
Hazard>Cazorla
Ramsey>Ramires
Arteta>Lampard
Mikel=Flamini
Mata>Wilshere
Schurrle>Podolski
de Bruyne=Rosicky
Willian>Chamberlain

Arsenal by far.

Arsenal has a better balance and a better spine so the gunners easily to be honest.

Chelsea's have so many issues....

Oscar can't create, Hazard is meh majority of the time and none of their right wing options inspire anyone with any confidence.... and as i said all summer their midfield 2 is probably the worse of all the big guys.

Ramires is overrated and has the positional sense of a rat on an epileptic overdose an they zero good attacking/creative CMs.

Arsenal's is perfectly balanced and everyone carries out their roles to perfection its not even close really.