free_cat wrote:

zizzle wrote:If Mourinho retired today he'd still be the best coach of his generation.

Pep Guardiola is not considered to be in Mou's generation?

We can go forever about how Pep only won in Barcelona how he had one of the strongest squads in history, while Mourinho won titles in 4 different countries and so on, but hey, we can still have different opinions and not go there

Gil wrote:People still think he was ever going to United lol?

Reminds me of the time everyone thought Hazard was nailed on for United because they were in the running.

Two CL titles so far in his career. As many as the greatest of all time.

Poor troll attempt.

Do not!! come onto my thread and call me a troll...stay off the thread in future

FYI, Grooverider.

You do not get to decide who can post in this thread and who cannot.

That is our decision.

----------------------------------

That said,

Discounting Mourinho's time at Inter is distinctly in poor taste. What other team beat that all-powerful Barca team as convincingly as his Inter side did in that first leg? Who kept Messi as quiet as Zanetti did in that match?

If you're going to trash the man, don't gloss over the stuff that you find inconvenient to your premise. It does not paint you in the best light.

I do agree that Mourinho and his attitude have contributed to be his achilles heel with his stint at Real Madrid but let's not kid ourselves, the man is a great manager.

Don't agree at all with the disregard to Inter's great success that season, you know, the season where they beat Barcelona at their pump head on. Also, you clearly omitted his time at Porto. I know people don't like to admit it but that is a great accomplishment despite him getting very lucky against Man Utd.

Not really a Mourinho fan, however he's being underrated here.

He was probably considered for the Man Utd job, however not a lot of managers are long term managers. Mourinho stays at a club 2-3 years, Man Utd wanted a long term manager.

He didn't really fail at Real Madrid. He's won a La Liga, a Copa del Rey and has a chance to win another. That isn't really failing. Took the club to the semis for 3 seasons in a row. I know it's either the Cup or nothing, however he did progress with the club, considering we weren't getting past the last 16.

He's going back to Chelsea because it's the best club that's available with a manager vacancy. It's his favourite club too. It's not because he couldn't cut it elsewhere.

Gil wrote:People still think he was ever going to United lol?

Reminds me of the time everyone thought Hazard was nailed on for United because they were in the running.

Two CL titles so far in his career. As many as the greatest of all time.

Poor troll attempt.

Are you referring to the most titles won by a manager in the European Cup/CL?

Inter won a crap league with hardly any competition from 2007-10... Inter literally lost 2 games per season. Only real competition they had were Milan.

But Mourinho is still a very good manager due to the wins in the CL

RedOranje wrote:

Gil wrote:People still think he was ever going to United lol?

Reminds me of the time everyone thought Hazard was nailed on for United because they were in the running.

Two CL titles so far in his career. As many as the greatest of all time.

Poor troll attempt.

Are you referring to the most titles won by a manager in the European Cup/CL?

He is talking about Fergie....

Man, if i ever get to become a football coach i'd luuurve to be a failure like Mourinho
A few points on the OP
- You calling our UCL semi defeats as choking makes me believe a) u started watching footy 3 years back and are unfamiliar with a proper choke-job
b) u are unfamiliar with the word Choke and are just throwing it around.

- He wasn't considerd for the Man U job probably coz of his unwillingness to stick around for long, as against his coching record, which is quite splendid in England.

- His 'US AGAINST THE WORLD' approach at chelsea and inter mean that he is passionately loathed by his opponents and passionately loved by his own club supporters. This is the reason he wants to go back 'home' to chelsea and NOT coz he can't cut it elsewhere.

- His record at Porto alone is enough to ensure him a place amongst the greatest modern day managers. Nuff said

- Oh, and the part about Inter not having competiton is just BS of the highest order. Roma were very unlucky to not win the league that year. And Inter beat the Champions of Spain, England, and Germany to win the UCL. I don't know what more competition you want.

- Calling His time at Madrid a failure is a bit extreme IMO. Sure he underachieved, but the improvements were quite tangible (breaking the Barca hoodoo, massive imprvmnt in the UCL, winning the first Copa in two decades). Still not enough to be a success, but definetly not a failure.

As Gil said above, fail troll is fail. Better luck next time

yeah, well at the end of the day he still got snubbed by two European Giants that are Barcelona and Manchester United.

deal with it Mou Fanboys

You call people Mourinho fanboys, yet create a thread fueled by hate and ignorance, say what you want but Mourinho has his name etched in the list of football's greatest managers.

buddytaller wrote:You call people Mourinho fanboys, yet create a thread fueled by hate and ignorance, say what you want but Mourinho has his name etched in the list of football's greatest managers.

Its not fueled by hate and ignorance at all, you are missing the point...

The point that Man Utd and Barcelona both over looked the man is fact the he is massively overrated and people by into his 'im the best in the world - bar none' nonsense.

he has an over-inflated ego and thinks he could/can 'walk' into any job he pleases, so hopefully it brings him back down to earth.

Players not on speaking terms with him prove hes not a likable character when things around him are crumbling....

underdog football. None of the great clubs want to play underdog football. If Madrid hadn't had so many pre 1/4 CL exits in a row, wouldn't have happened here either. Flo wants to win CL like breathing air. That failed to in the end...

I doubt you will ever see Mou manage a truly elite club ever. After the madrid debacle Pr-wise, that door is shut forever unless the club is in disarray... and even then.

andiii wrote:

Grooverider wrote:
Inter Milan success, but what competition did they actually have? lol

, barca in their prime,

VivaStPauli wrote: And Barca was at their strongest back then.

I know that from 2008-12 we have been the best team but both of these comments are off, regarding that 2010 season. This was our WORST season in that 4 year span. We had our transfer fiascos, mainly with Ibra so the team was just displaced at times, we barely won La Liga and of course we got ko'd from the CL.

I'm not sure about the rest of his thread but when looking at Mou's treble winning season he did NOT face the strongest Barca team of all time like u guys said. And that's taking nothing away from him, a treble is a treble, but he faced a much stronger Barca in the 2011 semis.

Man Utd would've never approached Mourinho lol.. he's a short term manager who intends to win as much trophies as possible during his reign. Appointing him would've meant giving him the full control of the club which was never gonna happen.

He had almost landed Barca job but his attitude deserved no place there. He wasn't snubbed because he was crap.. he was snubbed because of his off-field antics.

As buddytaller mentioned.. Mourinho has his name etched in the list of football's greatest managers.

this thread is too funny, for me if anything the farce that is real madrid showed itself...Where players are more powerful than the coach, where some players are not benchable..Madrid is doomed with the kind of insane player power showcased by their so called captain and ramos...No one can ever be bigger than the coach, madrid also were having an abysmal record till jose came in. People are so short term memoried........it's insane!

ExtremistEnigma wrote:Man Utd would've never approached Mourinho lol.. he's a short term manager who intends to win as much trophies as possible during his reign. Appointing him would've meant giving him the full control of the club which was never gonna happen.

He had almost landed Barca job but his attitude deserved no place there. He wasn't snubbed because he was crap.. he was snubbed because of his off-field antics.

As buddytaller mentioned.. Mourinho has his name etched in the list of football's greatest managers.

I can agree with some of that, but I'm super glad Barca snubbed him. And we showed that we could become the best without him, luckily. No one denies his past credentials or the fact that he has had personally an awesome career. But what if be hadn't been so insufferable, arrogant and classless in the last 4 yrs. of his career?

He wouldn't of been any less successful if he hadn't been such a douche and even if some see his douchy-ness with Pep as "mind games", he still wasn't all that successful at Real.

It just seems as if that whole "trolling, mind game" mentality which he thrived on for a bit is now the main reason most clubs (especially bigger clubs) would want nothing to do with him.

Yeah doomed. Last 26 years (SAF's reign)

Man U
13 Premier League Titles
5 FA Cups
2 CLs

Madrid
11 La Liga titles
3 CDRs
3 CLs

Really terrible how doomed we are lol. And the funny thing is that Mou is only responsible for 1 La Liga and 1 CDR. His impact = average at best.

McLewis wrote:FYI, Grooverider.

You do not get to decide who can post in this thread and who cannot.

That is our decision.

----------------------------------

That said,

Discounting Mourinho's time at Inter is distinctly in poor taste. What other team beat that all-powerful Barca team as convincingly as his Inter side did in that first leg? Who kept Messi as quiet as Zanetti did in that match?

If you're going to trash the man, don't gloss over the stuff that you find inconvenient to your premise. It does not paint you in the best light.

barca 2011 wrote:

ExtremistEnigma wrote:Man Utd would've never approached Mourinho lol.. he's a short term manager who intends to win as much trophies as possible during his reign. Appointing him would've meant giving him the full control of the club which was never gonna happen.

He had almost landed Barca job but his attitude deserved no place there. He wasn't snubbed because he was crap.. he was snubbed because of his off-field antics.

As buddytaller mentioned.. Mourinho has his name etched in the list of football's greatest managers.

I can agree with some of that, but I'm super glad Barca snubbed him. And we showed that we could become the best without him, luckily. No one denies his past credentials or the fact that he has had personally an awesome career. But what if be hadn't been so insufferable, arrogant and classless in the last 4 yrs. of his career?

He wouldn't of been any less successful if he hadn't been such a douche and even if some see his douchy-ness with Pep as "mind games", he still wasn't all that successful at Real.

It just seems as if that whole "trolling, mind game" mentality which he thrived on for a bit is now the main reason most clubs (especially bigger clubs) would want nothing to do with him.

http://www.goallegacy.net/t30303-ronaldo-insults-mourinho#895866

but why is mourinho the swearing at him for ronaldo!!!!!!!!!!!

A link to a link to the source

The verbal exchange between Mourinho and Luka Modric in that midweek game was an all the more pleasant affair. After substituting the former Tottenham player in the second half Mourinho told him: 'for the worst signing of the season you're not at all bad at football'.

whats happening man?

I just realized

That was a compliment. Everyone has been saying for the whole season that he is a flop and Mou said that he isn't bad at all.