Re: Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2

by Kick Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 16:27

If we were to play a 4-4-1 I'd rather see this:

-----------defence
Ramires-Mikel-Modric
--------------------Lampard
----------Drogba
--------Torres

by iNFINITY9910 Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 17:27

kick mars wrote:We won't spend 100m when we can only report a 45m loss.

We wont be keeping all the players Smile

by Kick Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 17:28

if we do spend 100m we would have to make 65m from our current players, I doubt it.

by Blue Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 17:51

4-4-1-1?

NOOOOOOOOOOOO

I still believe we need an attacking midfielder.

If we sign Modric, it is possible to see both Essien and Ramires on the bench.

by Blue Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 17:51

kick mars wrote:if we do spend 100m we would have to make 65m from our current players, I doubt it.

How did you come with this number?

by Kick Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 17:55

Assuming the club breaks even over the year, FFP states we must make a max loss of 45m no? therefore for us to spend 100m and still fit into FFP's regulations we must make 65m from our current players.

by Blue Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 18:01

kick mars wrote:Assuming the club breaks even over the year, FFP states we must make a max loss of 45m no? therefore for us to spend 100m and still fit into FFP's regulations we must make 65m from our current players.

I don't think it's this year where your loss have to be less then 45m, and i already that FFP will not be perfect and it will have major loopholes.

We will sing beyond Modric, De Bruyne, and Lukaku.

by Kick Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 18:04

TBH, we only need one more. a LW/AM.

If that, everyone on this forum doubts Malouda but if we can get back to form, he can too.

by Blue Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 18:33

Hopefully that player is Pastore.

Latest on Pastore:

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11668_6995463,00.html

We should've signed him in 2009, when we were strongly linked with him.

by Kick Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 18:37

Depends on the cost, bet you thought you'd never hear a Chelsea fan say that.

by iNFINITY9910 Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 19:03

I thought 65m was the allowance?

by Blue Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 20:22

Skysports, telegraph, and guardian are all speculating that we will spend big this summer.

We will easily spend over 65m.

by iNFINITY9910 Sat 18 Jun 2011 - 21:12

I mean 65m was the allowance.. we spend 100m and sell 35m?

by Blue Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 0:10

iNFINITY9910 wrote:I mean 65m was the allowance.. we spend 100m and sell 35m?

I don't know anything about an allowance, i just know we will spend.

by fatman123 Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 0:30

no! pastore maybe be in his early 20's but hes got the physical build of a 10 yr old, not big enough for the pl imo

by Blue Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 1:22

fatman123 wrote:no! pastore maybe be in his early 20's but hes got the physical build of a 10 yr old, not big enough for the pl imo

Pastore is amazingly build for his age, he is not smallish by any mean of imagination. Btw he is taller then any of our MF's.

by Kick Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 4:30

he's a better build for the epl than modric.

by Blue Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 4:35

How much do you think Modric is gonna cost?

by Kick Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 5:00

I'm hoping 33-35 m max, anymore than that and Pastore is the better option.

by Blue Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 5:08

I think signing Modric is going to be as Torres, even tougher imo.

If Spurs sell Modric, then this could cause a domino effect and they could further lose Bale and VDV. So i believe that Spurs would do everything in their power to hang on to Modric, and the only possible way they would let him go is massive bid somewhere between 40-45m.

hopefully we avoid spurs bait.

by Kick Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 7:26

VDV doesn't suit Spurs IMO, he's too good for them. Same with Modric, He'd suit us great, VDV should go to someone like Milan, where he will be their best AM.

Bale just sucks so he should stay at spurs. :coffee:

by iNFINITY9910 Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 11:20

Anyone noticed how we are linked with not buffed up players anymore? Even Torres is not that type of a player.

by Brigate Rossonere Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 14:47

Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2 - Page 2 Funny-Nando-fernando-torres-18528780-600-417

Modric will never be anything like that (wo)man.

by iNFINITY9910 Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 15:33

He came to Chelsea and has become a man Wink

Modric doesnt want to be torres version 2 - Page 2 Fernando%2BTorres_Chelsea%2BJersey

by Blue Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 16:33

I really believe that Modric to Chelsea won't happen. This would be too damaging to spurs.

I think in the end Spurs will give Modric a massive wage raise and sign a few good players to show that they will compete with united, chelsea, arsenal, and Man city.

by iNFINITY9910 Sun 19 Jun 2011 - 16:39

They will sign strikers as usual... lol

by Sponsored content