David Villa and Fernando Torres

Should they both stay at their respective clubs where they're now second choice or move elsewhere in January to try and regain their form?

They both will sign with Liverpool.

let villa stay and pull over a pinto (by having more bookings than his total apperances )
bad english i know

...or should they just swap teams?

The Daily Mail wrote:Chelsea could be tempted with a 'swap of flops' deal involving Fernando Torres and David Villa

source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2073972/Chelsea-swap-Fernando-Torres-David-Villa.html

supra969 wrote:let villa stay and pull over a pinto (by having more bookings than his total apperances )
bad english i know

welcome

Raptorgunner wrote:They both will sign with Liverpool.

I'd take Torres over Villa... and I don't want Torres.

everest1 wrote:...or should they just swap teams?

The Daily Mail wrote:Chelsea could be tempted with a 'swap of flops' deal involving Fernando Torres and David Villa

source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2073972/Chelsea-swap-Fernando-Torres-David-Villa.html

:lol!:

Villa would be a hit at Chelsea IMO. Torres? Let him go Blue Square.

Villa has always been the better player. However, this season, he has shown signs of his ability declining. Don't know where the logic in swapping them has come from.

Hasn't Pep come out and rubbished the rumours of Villa leaving?

Lol, Villa is not on a strong run right now but he's certainly not playing bad in a consistent basis, he's just having a dry run but he plays well. The same cannot be said of Torres

meteormaker wrote:Villa would be a hit at Chelsea IMO. Torres? Let him go Blue Square.

He's good enough to play against Vidic.

Torres to PSG/Malaga/Anzhi :?:

They'd probably shoot him in Russia if he does another hamstring. Definitely not going there. :\

Time to start a Torres to Malaga rumour to kill RAWK again.

.

Do we have a percentage of the sell on fee for Torres?

Gil, any chance of Drogba staying put for another year?

EDIT: Good idea to edit your post btw. GL would of went into a riot. :\

RealGunner wrote:

supra969 wrote:let villa stay and pull over a pinto (by having more bookings than his total apperances )
bad english i know

welcome

thank you ive been looking around the fourm and it looks as if im going to be here for a while

ynwa wrote:Gil, any chance of Drogba staying put for another year?

EDIT: Good idea to edit your post btw. GL would of went into a riot. :\

I saw it but

Oh, another Bayern fan. Welcome. Post in the Bayern forums!

Torres is in long term for Chelsea, IMO. I don't think Abramovich would have spent so much money just to have him sold right away.

Villa is still good, just with Torres' boots on. He's going to have to fight a lot for his place, so if he wants a starting spot he could consider moving. I doubt Pep would let him go.

Irish_Catalan_Scouser wrote:Do we have a percentage of the sell on fee for Torres?

Anyone actually know the answer for this?

IMO it's going to be very hard for Chelsea to get rid of Torres.

The problem people are not addressing is his 150k per week salary. I believe where ever he goes this will be the major issue as it will piss off teammates that are making less but contributing more and then everyone at the club will have there hand out looking for a raise.

His form just isn't good enough for the baggage that he will bring with him as he right now is a team destroyer. It sucks because he can be awesome and is a good enough guy but when you make that much money and don't produce you become a massive problem for whatever team your on.

Not to mention you are asking teams to pay you for that problem which if there smart enough they will stay away from.

IMO the only teams Torres would work on would be PSG, Madrid, Malaga, and Inter (although I think he would flop HARD in Italy).

As for Villa, there not selling him so it's a non issue.

Villa is suffering because of his role, and he needs more time to adapt. Being WC = success at barca. They are one of the most specialised teams in history. Apart from goals he does his job well.

Torres is a shell of the player that has been shite for almost 2 years now. He flops for Spain, flopped for pool and is now flopping for Chelsea. Let's just say the dude has peaked.

Flopped for pool?

Shite for almost 3 years now?

Come on now...

RAFA = TORRES

Torres was shit before Rafa and has been shit since Rafa left him.