TBF I don't think anyone's surprised people don't like him. We just defend when they attack.

Let's talk about the football: an Iniesta-like assist and a last minute equalizer. What a beast

Should have been sent off. Handball, that bite, he was one racial slur away from having the most Suarez-y game ever lol

He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

ynwa wrote:He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

8 game ban

Media outlets continue to brainwash the stupid, I see. The FA have came out and stated that both Terry and Suarez aren't racist. They've gave the ban to show the footballing world that racism doesn't belong in football.

ynwa wrote:He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

actually, If the ref viewed Torres as about to score, it could be a red card offence as he stopped a clear cut goal scoring chance, in the box.

Irony, when you claim Terry is no better yet ignore the lack of evidence towards him too.

it's not a clear goalscoring chance if there's no balk control or avoiding a tap in.

Kick wrote:

ynwa wrote:He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

actually, If the ref viewed Torres as about to score, it could be a red card offence as he stopped a clear cut goal scoring chance, in the box.

Irony, when you claim Terry is no better yet ignore the lack of evidence towards him too.

Where have I ever stated Terry was banned for being a racist? I'd really like to see you back that shit it up.

Also, Torres was NOT in a clear cut goal scoring opportunity. You're simply deluded if you think otherwise. The only way it would have been a sending off offence would have been if Suarez cleared the ball off the LINE with his hand. But he didn't. It was a stupid penalty to give a way, but there was no way that was a red card.

Suarez has admitted to diving and admitted he was racist. YOUR DELUSIONAL

Where did he admit he was a racist? He's admitted to diving, yes. A lot of players dive. In fact, Torres and Mata from last nights game "dived" and Carragher and Lucas were both given a yellow card.

If I'm delusional, what exactly does that make you? Lol...

ynwa wrote:

Kick wrote:

ynwa wrote:He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

actually, If the ref viewed Torres as about to score, it could be a red card offence as he stopped a clear cut goal scoring chance, in the box.

Irony, when you claim Terry is no better yet ignore the lack of evidence towards him too.

Where have I ever stated Terry was banned for being a racist? I'd really like to see you back that shit it up.

Also, Torres was NOT in a clear cut goal scoring opportunity. You're simply deluded if you think otherwise. The only way it would have been a sending off offence would have been if Suarez cleared the ball off the LINE with his hand. But he didn't. It was a stupid penalty to give a way, but there was no way that was a red card.

ynwa wrote:Also, I find it ironic how can you suggest Suarez is bad publicity but continue to defend your very own, John Terry...

What could you possibly be talking about?

Where do I begin?

Let's start with Wayne Bridge...
Also ADMITTED TO cheating whilst he was engaged...
Certain he missed the 2002 or 2006 World Cup because of something...
And he also mocked the 9/11 whilst he was intoxicated.

Role model, eh?

Uruguay's Radio Sport 890, Suarez said: "I knew what I did and there is a
kind of football law that says, 'What happens on the pitch, stays on
the pitch and that's the end of the story.'"

That's off field.


If Suarez bit someone in a club would everyone be causing such a fuss? Doubt it.

JT's only on field problem was the 'racism' scandal, yet I have not seen any evidence of racism. I don't think Suarez is a racist, but I don't think a serial biter is someone you want at your club.

Gerrard ain't much a role model too in fact he should have been sent to jail for his assault in that bar

He's had two different racism scandals...

Also, how can you honestly say that's okay because it's "off field"?

Are you honestly telling me if Luis Suarez bit somebody off the pitch, no one will make a fuss? Anyway. I'm not defending him biting Ivanovic in any way. It was stupid and I simply can't defend his actions.

But how can you honestly say he's "bad publicity" for the club? Ridiculous to say so.

Rebelles.REUS.rex wrote:Uruguay's Radio Sport 890, Suarez said: "I knew what I did and there is a
kind of football law that says, 'What happens on the pitch, stays on
the pitch and that's the end of the story.'"

Continue to clutch at straws...

Rebelles.REUS.rex wrote:Gerrard ain't much a role model too in fact he should have been sent to jail for his assault in that bar

That was actually self defence...

Anywho.

Footballers aren't role models. I think we've all made that clear...

Some footballers are. Juan Mata for Example.

Kick wrote:

ynwa wrote:He was yellow carded for the hand ball... it wasn't a red card offence.

He should of been sent off with the bite... there should be no behaviour like that in football.

With that said, there's no *bleep* evidence of him being a "racist". You've been told time and time again and continue to ignore facts. You really ought to stop posting anything related with Suarez and racism as you're coming across as an ignorant dick.....

actually, If the ref viewed Torres as about to score, it could be a red card offence as he stopped a clear cut goal scoring chance, in the box.

Irony, when you claim Terry is no better yet ignore the lack of evidence towards him too.

ynwa wrote:Also, I find it ironic how can you suggest Suarez is bad publicity but continue to defend your very own, John Terry...

Funny, it's almost as though ynwa was saying the two cases are equivalent...

pot calling kettle black and all that fun stuff.

Rebelles.REUS.rex wrote:Suarez has admitted to diving and admitted he was racist. YOUR DELUSIONAL

When has he ever admitted to being a racist? You are delusional to think that because he was handed a 8 game ban he was guilty. Let's talk about the "evidence", shall we? The FA had 3 sources claiming that Suarez had being racist. Evra who claimed that Suarez had called him negro 5 times. The ref claimed he heard Suarez say "tues negro" which doesn't even make sense in Spanish as tues is not even a word, according to him it was only said once. There was a third person, I can't remember exactly whom, that said that Suarez said "tu eres negro".

So none of the evidence agrees with each other in either what it is that Suarez said or how many times. Let's add on to that one source claims Suarez said "tues", which as I already mentioned is not even a word. Let's assume he meant "eres" as another source said. They are both impossible because Suarez is from Uruguay. In Uruguay you do not use the word "eres" but "vos". I am from the same region and it feels very, very, very deeply wrong to say eres instead of "vos" in that situation. Finally let's add that in the rioplatense region negro is a common nickname often meant affectionately. We call one of my aunts "negra" and have for as long as I can remember.

So what is this "evidence" you speak of? Suarez getting an 8 match ban based on reports that are inconsistent with one another and make no sense is not evidence any judge in the world would have ruled for, but the FA is not a criminal court, so they get away with this sort of bullshit.

//rant

Meh I honestly cgaf. Every team has players that do questionable things. Typical foreigner witch hunt by a press that rarely discusses football. The fact that Gary Neville is seen as the second coming of Cruyff with respect to his tactical analysis sums up English football.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xz740a_luis-suarez-not-just-a-diver_sport?search_algo=2#.UXVPSbWsiSo

A nice video showing off Suarez's "other" skills

Why are you bringing in cases of racial abuse? ITS BITING ON THE PITCH!! And everything JT does is outside..

iNFINITY9910 wrote:Why are you bringing in cases of racial abuse? ITS BITING ON THE PITCH!! And everything JT does is outside..

so they are supposed to be role models ON THE PITCH, and not OFF it?

Harry Redknapp wrote:

iNFINITY9910 wrote:Why are you bringing in cases of racial abuse? ITS BITING ON THE PITCH!! And everything JT does is outside..

so they are supposed to be role models ON THE PITCH, and not OFF it?

Hmmm, Yes. They shouldn't even be viewed as role models off the pitch.

Sure kids want to aspire to reach their level, but they shouldn't look at them an believe that's how they should model their lives.

There are better role models out there than footballers.