Do Sponsor's make football kits look cheap and disgusting?

I think they make them look cheap and disgusting tbh, one of the reasons i consider international kits better because they dont have lettering thrown all over them.

Discuss.

If we all had Virgin Money on our shirt it would be nice

Yh, looks awesome you can even see the northern rock behind it, because its so fckin cheap

Some do it more, some do it less.

Qatar Foundation...

Come back when Betclic get a hold of your team. Even worse if your top isn't one solid colour. It just cuts through the stripes. What makes it worse is other teams have Betclic intergrated into the shirt to make it look half-decent. Juventus get a white rectangle bumper sticker slammed behind BETCLIC


EDIT: I forgot to mention how the white rectangle doesn't even match the white on our kit. How lazy can you get?

I could give a 7 year old crayons and he would come up with a nicer design for the logo.

:'(

Eh, I don't mind the look of it. It's our owners gig too, so it's all good in my eyes.

I liked it when we had Bwin. Fly Emirates is alright.


#Bwinning

A well-designed and unobtrusive sponsor logo can bring a kit together, IMO. A lot of national team kits (and many club kits, when they have to play without a sponsor) simply look too bare on the front without the sponsor... after all, the kits are generally designed to have something there.

Liverpool and ManUtd sponsors have generally been pretty good about keeping their logos unobtrusive and avoiding the "white box" around the letters, for example.

I think the "T" on the Bayern kit is okay. BMG's kit looks yucky with their sponsor logo.

justdoit_ wrote:

Eh, I don't mind the look of it. It's our owners gig too, so it's all good in my eyes.

Thats a nice looking kit

Im not a big fan of our Bwin logo, hopefully Fly Emirates look nicer.

I'm Still in love with this one TBH....don't think it looked cheap at all...





Vodafone for United and Carlsberg for Livepool are the other greatones I can think of.

I would prefer without, but I'll have to agree with what Red said, occasionally a sponsor can really add to a kit





IMO both O2 and Fly Emirates looked great on Arsenals kits.

In general yes, however some are fine whereas others just look horrible.

completely depends on the sponsor



this is imho one of the best shirts ever, not exaggerating... too bad the sponsor was a scam :lucas:



this, on the other hand, is *bleep* awful

Of course the sponsor makes the shirts look cheap and stupid. IT's why other sports who can have commercials during the game don't put the sponsors on the uniforms because it just doesn't really make any sense.

It's also why national teams don't do it because they don't really care about making money.

I mean companies who make cloths don't put a massive logo of theres across the front of them because it's ugly and not fashionable and just over the top.

It its designed good I dont mind it : )

WIND

Patrick Bateman wrote:

WIND

However, WIND television adverts are GOAT.

depends on the sponsor, i'd say the fly emirates ones look good, same goes with inters sponsor.

Nope they dont, if you get butthurt because ur team has sht sponsors then so be it, but i love bwin on my shirt.

Looks the best when they change the color,like how t-mobile doesn't use pink for Bayern.Also if teams with no sponsor's would put numbers one the front they wouldn't look like a high school team.

i think we (inter) have the best looking shirt sponsor from any clubs i know. but yea, i'd still prefer it if shirts didn't have sonsors. Quatar foundation one is tasteful though

I like the Samsung sponsors on our kits, make them look classy.

I like sponsors when they are not over the top. Generally just the name like Chelsea's or Arsenal's. I hate ones that are boxes or are over the top.