This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
+22
Nishankly
Wilson37
OLpower
Raptorgunner
El Chelsea Fuerte
VanDeezNuts
Sushi Master
REWB
nichabr
SaintJoe
Zealous
EarlyPrototype
guest7
Arquitecto
RealGunner
Ali
Jay29
Interista809
Magricos
The Madrid One
fatman123
Dnmac4
26 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
He's a prisoner of his own policy basically
RealGunner- Admin
- Posts : 89513
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
RealGunner wrote:He's a prisoner of his own policy basically
Agreed, but from an outsiders point of view it seems like such a simple problem to solve. If Arsenal would just raise there wage structure I think they would retain a lot of the players they lose, not all but a lot.
I mean they buy youth put all that time and money into making them good/great players and when they are really ready to benefit from all the time and money they invested they leave and you're forced to start the cycle all over again.
I mean they don't have to turn into Man City but they just aren't competitive with there pay and you can't expect players to stay if they can double there salaries somewhere else.
Dnmac4- First Team
- Posts : 2911
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
omarish wrote:nichabr wrote:excuses excuses...wow at the people saying hes forced to buy youngsters when he can loan in or keep some of the veterans that they sold they would be a much more stable team if they kept some of the players they sold...wenger has both brought arsenal to the heights and imo currently bringing them back down...Wenger says what he says so that word doesn't hit the market that Arsenal can't spend with the big boys. Losing the "elite" brand is pretty catastrophic. He has to play a game of smoke and mirrors until, hopefully, the finances sort themselves out. Doesn't have much time left now.
Loaning is what small clubs do
Also, what quality players can you loan? Wenger opted for buying youngsters with immense potential instead
funny so every club that loans a player is a small club? thats foolish..but what am i supposed to expect from a RM fan they prefer to spend cash just for spending sake.
nichabr- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Arsenal long term will be in incredible financial shape, at least. Shiny new stadium and once we get a decent sponsorship deal we can spend with the big boys.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
nichabr wrote:omarish wrote:nichabr wrote:excuses excuses...wow at the people saying hes forced to buy youngsters when he can loan in or keep some of the veterans that they sold they would be a much more stable team if they kept some of the players they sold...wenger has both brought arsenal to the heights and imo currently bringing them back down...Wenger says what he says so that word doesn't hit the market that Arsenal can't spend with the big boys. Losing the "elite" brand is pretty catastrophic. He has to play a game of smoke and mirrors until, hopefully, the finances sort themselves out. Doesn't have much time left now.
Loaning is what small clubs do
Also, what quality players can you loan? Wenger opted for buying youngsters with immense potential instead
funny so every club that loans a player is a small club? thats foolish..but what am i supposed to expect from a RM fan they prefer to spend cash just for spending sake.
Yeah, we spend instead of loaning. We bought Adebayor for half of a season then gave him back to City didnt we?
Loaning a starting XI is different, that's a sign of a small team. When you are a elite you should be spending and not loaning all your players. You should be the one loaning.
guest7- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 8276
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Sushi Master wrote:Arsenal long term will be in incredible financial shape, at least. Shiny new stadium and once we get a decent sponsorship deal we can spend with the big boys.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
Thats'w where you're wrong, the rest don't have to be patient. They can force a transfer like Nasri did and go make more money somewhere else if they have a team who wants them. This is an issue they need to tackle NOW. Players have so much power these days.
Dnmac4- First Team
- Posts : 2911
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
id say hes rated perfectly. not under or over rated.
everyone has had plenty of time to analyze wenger. he is a fantastic manager who, despite finances, has done fantastic in one of the most competitive leagues over the past decade and a half or so.
everyone has had plenty of time to analyze wenger. he is a fantastic manager who, despite finances, has done fantastic in one of the most competitive leagues over the past decade and a half or so.
VanDeezNuts- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5869
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
They could and they should, actually. Apart from van Persie, there's no KEY player we'd miss. Walcott won't be earning as much, but he sure as hell will get a raise in his new contract. Once we get rid of Almunia, Rosicky and probably Diaby, we have like 150k left in the wage bill.dnmac4 wrote:Sushi Master wrote:Arsenal long term will be in incredible financial shape, at least. Shiny new stadium and once we get a decent sponsorship deal we can spend with the big boys.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
Thats'w where you're wrong, the rest don't have to be patient. They can force a transfer like Nasri did and go make more money somewhere else if they have a team who wants them. This is an issue they need to tackle NOW. Players have so much power these days.
I'm not expecting any big name signings, but at least we're going for more proven players now instead of a wave of kids which have more effect. Arteta, Santos, Mertesacker... all signings we would have never seen from Wenger a few years ago.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Sushi Master wrote:They could and they should, actually. Apart from van Persie, there's no KEY player we'd miss. Walcott won't be earning as much, but he sure as hell will get a raise in his new contract. Once we get rid of Almunia, Rosicky and probably Diaby, we have like 150k left in the wage bill.dnmac4 wrote:Sushi Master wrote:Arsenal long term will be in incredible financial shape, at least. Shiny new stadium and once we get a decent sponsorship deal we can spend with the big boys.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
Thats'w where you're wrong, the rest don't have to be patient. They can force a transfer like Nasri did and go make more money somewhere else if they have a team who wants them. This is an issue they need to tackle NOW. Players have so much power these days.
I'm not expecting any big name signings, but at least we're going for more proven players now instead of a wave of kids which have more effect. Arteta, Santos, Mertesacker... all signings we would have never seen from Wenger a few years ago.
Really? I think it would be devastating if you lost Sanga, Verm, Song, Wilshire, or Ramsey. I could see someone coming for Sanga this summer too if you guys finish outside the CL.
Dnmac4- First Team
- Posts : 2911
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
I'm talking about the guys with only a few years left in their contract (van Persie, Verm, Walcott and Song).They aren't earning much of anything, and if Merts is getting 90k they'll be around that number or so.dnmac4 wrote:Sushi Master wrote:They could and they should, actually. Apart from van Persie, there's no KEY player we'd miss. Walcott won't be earning as much, but he sure as hell will get a raise in his new contract. Once we get rid of Almunia, Rosicky and probably Diaby, we have like 150k left in the wage bill.dnmac4 wrote:Sushi Master wrote:Arsenal long term will be in incredible financial shape, at least. Shiny new stadium and once we get a decent sponsorship deal we can spend with the big boys.
The wage structure is slowly being changed... at least we have Mertesacker who's a newcomer earning 90k and I'm sure once van Persie sorts out his contract deal he'll be easily going 120k or so.
The rest, well, they'll have to be patient.
Thats'w where you're wrong, the rest don't have to be patient. They can force a transfer like Nasri did and go make more money somewhere else if they have a team who wants them. This is an issue they need to tackle NOW. Players have so much power these days.
I'm not expecting any big name signings, but at least we're going for more proven players now instead of a wave of kids which have more effect. Arteta, Santos, Mertesacker... all signings we would have never seen from Wenger a few years ago.
Really? I think it would be devastating if you lost Sanga, Verm, Song, Wilshire, or Ramsey. I could see someone coming for Sanga this summer too if you guys finish outside the CL.
Wenger has already come out and said they'll be negotiating contract talks right away, instead of that bullshit "we're in the middle of the season" excuse, so at least there are being some changes. We'll have to wait and see how they turn out.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
fatman123 wrote:10 years ago he was under rated, but unfortunately Wenger has aged like milk and is starting to become a tad over rated, having said that hes still probably the man for the job at arsenal but tbh if he goes this season and next season tropheyless it maight just be then end of his time as a gooner
El Chelsea Fuerte- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5952
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
sportsczy wrote:Do people realize when Arsenal started having a trophy drought? Right after the building of Emirates stadium. Crushing debt = selling of some players = no ability to buy any WC players = no ability to pay WC wages.
Year after year, Wenger is forced to play 17-19 year old kids. And when these kids reach their potential? The salary structure is so low at the club that Arsenal is unable to keep the players.
To me, Wenger is a genius just to keep Arsenal competitive while having huge limitations.
Under rated imo. It's not like Chelsea, Man U, Man City, Barca or Madrid where you can pretty much buy and pay whoever you need.
Raptorgunner- World Class Contributor
- Club Supported :
Posts : 18057
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
sportsczy wrote:Do people realize when Arsenal started having a trophy drought? Right after the building of Emirates stadium. Crushing debt = selling of some players = no ability to buy any WC players = no ability to pay WC wages.
Year after year, Wenger is forced to play 17-19 year old kids. And when these kids reach their potential? The salary structure is so low at the club that Arsenal is unable to keep the players.
To me, Wenger is a genius just to keep Arsenal competitive while having huge limitations.
Under rated imo. It's not like Chelsea, Man U, Man City, Barca or Madrid where you can pretty much buy and pay whoever you need.
It was probably the case when he started this policy but it's no longer the case since some years already. Arsenal has become a cash machine and Wenger still don't spend on World Class player.
He is a gamer lost in his belief that he will beat the odds. He started to think that his project was so great that he would just continue with the young growing and being completed by more young players.
But it is just not working. Even the players he has brought there don't believe in Arsenal anymore and are leaving when reaching their prime. He has to realize he won't succeed with his current policy.
OLpower- Banned (Permanent)
- Posts : 1518
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
No top team came up without spending.. Chelsea and Inter has shown it.. City is showing it... Any team can do it.. And once to sustain there you need to keep doing it.. But how did it Arsenal come up ? Thats why Wengers achievements are special and thats why i think he won the best coach of the decade.. So he will ever be one of greatest coaches... And no coach is perfect in all aspects..
The current situation is very different to that existed 6 to 7 years back.. Chelsea and City have bought football and together with Arsenals stadium loans have put some restrictions.. So winning the title or ending up as a runner up has become even more difficult... And its because of the great standards he have set and his huge success in the early years the expectations are so high.. And people demand it.. And when it does not come, they without considering the situation label him and his policy a failure...
Terribly underrated...
The current situation is very different to that existed 6 to 7 years back.. Chelsea and City have bought football and together with Arsenals stadium loans have put some restrictions.. So winning the title or ending up as a runner up has become even more difficult... And its because of the great standards he have set and his huge success in the early years the expectations are so high.. And people demand it.. And when it does not come, they without considering the situation label him and his policy a failure...
Terribly underrated...
Wilson37- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 2576
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 36
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Wenger is working at a job of his caliber. He not over or under rated IMO
Nishankly- Spicy Curry
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21021
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
He spends like a small level club would.
So that said, I would honestly like to see him at a small level club. I think it would be amazing if he went to a small club and made them a constant top 4 level club year in and year out like he does with Arsenal.
So that said, I would honestly like to see him at a small level club. I think it would be amazing if he went to a small club and made them a constant top 4 level club year in and year out like he does with Arsenal.
windkick- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 6251
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 41
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
ali8775 wrote:Magricos wrote:He isn't forced to play 17-19 year old "Kids"
oh yeah, like when he had 5 million pounds to spend , he could easily go buy a 26 year old WC striker.
I'm not too sure he is the best when it comes to spotting talents though. He usually misses out on cheap top talents (<10m) to his rivals and deals with other ones.
El Chelsea Fuerte- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5952
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
english_jewel wrote:ali8775 wrote:Magricos wrote:He isn't forced to play 17-19 year old "Kids"
oh yeah, like when he had 5 million pounds to spend , he could easily go buy a 26 year old WC striker.
I'm not too sure he is the best when it comes to spotting talents though. He usually misses out on cheap top talents (<10m) to his rivals and deals with other ones.
LOL...
Highburied- Banned (Permanent)
- Club Supported :
Posts : 2630
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 42
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Wenger is a unique case in comparison to other managers.
SAF is first with Wenger coming second best managers in the world.
You cant simply compare likes of Mourinho or Mancini with Wenger and SAF because the formers switch clubs just like that with loads of cash to spend.
In todays football is really hard to pick an Everton and transform it to a Man Utd or Arsenal. So theres a reason why Wenger was chosen best manager of decade.
Today is almost impossible to build a stadium and pay it within half decade, and guess what? A club manager has done it and its Wenger.
Its true, fans never bother to look at bigger pictures.
SAF is first with Wenger coming second best managers in the world.
You cant simply compare likes of Mourinho or Mancini with Wenger and SAF because the formers switch clubs just like that with loads of cash to spend.
In todays football is really hard to pick an Everton and transform it to a Man Utd or Arsenal. So theres a reason why Wenger was chosen best manager of decade.
Today is almost impossible to build a stadium and pay it within half decade, and guess what? A club manager has done it and its Wenger.
Its true, fans never bother to look at bigger pictures.
Highburied- Banned (Permanent)
- Club Supported :
Posts : 2630
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 42
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Underated, although he does like to BS about the money etc I 100% blame the board and not Wenger although he shouldn't be so stubborn either
Abramovich- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 6544
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
english_jewel wrote:ali8775 wrote:Magricos wrote:He isn't forced to play 17-19 year old "Kids"
oh yeah, like when he had 5 million pounds to spend , he could easily go buy a 26 year old WC striker.
I'm not too sure he is the best when it comes to spotting talents though. He usually misses out on cheap top talents (<10m) to his rivals and deals with other ones.
Dude its fun when you troll Arsenal once in a while..If you constantly keep trolling them with stupid posts like this ,it becomes all the more boring..I guess you need to realize that..
S- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 28536
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 33
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
Wegner is simply not the 2nd best manager in the world.
Magricos- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1910
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is Wenger Over or Under Rated?
highburied wrote:Wenger is a unique case in comparison to other managers.
SAF is first with Wenger coming second best managers in the world.
Wait a second, who's lol'ing who?
El Chelsea Fuerte- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5952
Join date : 2011-06-05
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» How highly would Maradona be rated if...
» Arbeloa is under-rated
» Flanagan....Very under-rated
» Top Rated U21 in europe -#Whoscored
» "Mancini will be gone by Christmas"
» Arbeloa is under-rated
» Flanagan....Very under-rated
» Top Rated U21 in europe -#Whoscored
» "Mancini will be gone by Christmas"
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 2:59 pm by À bout de souffle
» Barca 24/25 discussion
Today at 7:35 am by Myesyats
» Mbappe to Real Madrid - Official
Today at 2:54 am by Valkyrja
» Barca '24-'25 under Flick
Yesterday at 10:08 pm by BarcaLearning
» GL NBA fantasy 24-25
Yesterday at 5:04 pm by Warrior
» Szczęsny Appreciation Thread
Yesterday at 11:40 am by Myesyats
» Serie A 2024/2025
Yesterday at 10:32 am by BarcaLearning
» Ballon D'or 2024
Tue Sep 24, 2024 2:28 pm by Clutch
» Not Worthy of a Thread Mk. III
Tue Sep 24, 2024 11:13 am by Thimmy
» General Games Discussion
Tue Sep 24, 2024 7:34 am by Harmonica
» Champions League '24/25
Tue Sep 24, 2024 5:43 am by halamadrid2
» The US Politics Thread
Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:17 pm by BarrileteCosmico
» Premier League 2024/25
Mon Sep 23, 2024 11:40 am by BarcaLearning