Stoke want Lukaku on loan

No one at the minute because the rule stops them

But say if Fergies son had got preston into the prem, there might of been potential.

The owner of spurs & Arry are very friendly with Mike Ashley at newcastle.

There are all kinds of relationships between owners in football and dodgy deals.

Rules like this prevent them.

lukaku would be a really good singing for them cuz of how stoke play ( they realy on physicallity and strength ) something lukaku has obviously

No chance of a loan happening for now. Think he'll stay till January and then move towards the end of the window after the AFCON.

100% certain we wouldn't loan him to Hoofball FC either. Like Jewel said we need to loan him to a club where he'll be able to develop his technique.

IT CAN'T HAPPEN NOW.

Gil wrote:No chance of a loan happening for now. Think he'll stay till January and then move towards the end of the window after the AFCON.

100% certain we wouldn't loan him to Hoofball FC either. Like Jewel said we need to loan him to a club where he'll be able to develop his technique.

when u guya keep such talents ( sturridge and lukaku mainly ) in the bench they go to waste, u saw how sturridge played with bolton so loaning out lukaku ( later on ) would be perfect for his development

STURRIDGE ISN'T ON THE BENCH. HE'S SUSPENDED FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh and Drogba is 34, Anelka 33 by the end of next season. Kalou is pure shite.

Lukaku was clearly bought for the future not the present.

HscouserZ wrote:

Gil wrote:No chance of a loan happening for now. Think he'll stay till January and then move towards the end of the window after the AFCON.

100% certain we wouldn't loan him to Hoofball FC either. Like Jewel said we need to loan him to a club where he'll be able to develop his technique.

when u guya keep such talents ( sturridge and lukaku mainly ) in the bench they go to waste, u saw how sturridge played with bolton so loaning out lukaku ( later on ) would be perfect for his development

It's pretty hard to play Sturridge when he's suspended. But then again that's just my opinion.

Like Gil said, Lukaku is 18, give him a break. It's better he stays with the first team for a while and develops himself here and then when he's matured enough he can go on loan and prove that he has what it takes to start. It's no use sending him to a club where they are not many quality players right now because he won't learn anything from them.

Gil wrote:STURRIDGE ISN'T ON THE BENCH. HE'S SUSPENDED FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh and Drogba is 34, Anelka 33 by the end of next season. Kalou is pure shite.

Lukaku was clearly bought for the future not the present.

suspended i had no idea anyway even though torres is gonna play as a starter for sure ( for reasons i do not know of :lol!: ) drogba is injured true malouda and kalou i think are gonna play though them and torres . do u think sturridge is gonna play ?

RedOranje wrote:IT CAN'T HAPPEN NOW.

Ever had your BP tested?

Impossible. against FA rules

[/thread]

HscouserZ wrote:

Gil wrote:STURRIDGE ISN'T ON THE BENCH. HE'S SUSPENDED FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh and Drogba is 34, Anelka 33 by the end of next season. Kalou is pure shite.

Lukaku was clearly bought for the future not the present.

suspended i had no idea anyway even though torres is gonna play as a starter for sure ( for reasons i do not know of :lol!: ) drogba is injured true malouda and kalou i think are gonna play though them and torres . do u think sturridge is gonna play ?

You honestly think Anelka and Kalou can out-perform Sturridge? The only striker who can be considered better than Sturridge ATM is Mata, but we play with two wingers so it's all good.

cyberman wrote:Impossible. against FA rules

[/thread]

yup i think he's either gonna go in the winter or next season ...

cyberman wrote:Impossible. against FA rules

[/thread]

Thanks for that, cyber. It's odd no-one had thought to bring that up before.

Actually Lukaku can't be sold or loaned this season because he has already played for 2 clubs this season.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Players may be registered with a maximum of three clubs during one season. During this period, the player is only eligible to play official matches for two clubs. As an exception to this rule, a player moving between two clubs belonging to associations with overlapping seasons (i.e. start of the season in summer/autumn as opposed to winter/spring) may be eligible to play in official matches for a third club during the relevant season, provided he has fully complied with his contractual obligations towards his previous clubs.

-Article 5.3, FIFA transfer regulations.

5th time's the charm, then.

Hey guys, Lukaku can't be loaned this season.

Players may be registered with a maximum of three clubs during one season. During this period, the player is only eligible to play official matches for two clubs. As an exception to this rule, a player moving between two clubs belonging to associations with overlapping seasons (i.e. start of the season in summer/autumn as opposed to winter/spring) may be eligible to play in official matches for a third club during the relevant season, provided he has fully complied with his contractual obligations towards his previous clubs.

Thats from FIFA's rules.

And one more time for good measure...

You know what they say red, if you can't beat them, join them.

Players may be registered with a maximum of three clubs during one season. During this period, the player is only eligible to play official matches for two clubs. As an exception to this rule, a player moving between two clubs belonging to associations with overlapping seasons (i.e. start of the season in summer/autumn as opposed to winter/spring) may be eligible to play in official matches for a third club during the relevant season, provided he has fully complied with his contractual obligations towards his previous clubs.

Thats from Fifa's rules, it's why Lukaku can't join stoke.

I'm afraid I'll have to remove that post as it isn't explaining why Lukaka can't be loaned to Stoke...

Fixed it for ya

RedOranje wrote:5th time's the charm, then.

People were saying that Lukaku won't be able to transfer THIS window because of PL rules, and people like Gil were saying he can leave in January.