This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
+45
InterMalia
JAY-Z
Super_Floren
Lord Spencer
billionmillion
SaintJoe
alexjanosik
billy_gr
Doc
the xcx
Kev
izzy
xabi
matpol
cheesy
Albiceleste
buddytaller
jibers
guest7
free_cat
Babun
VivaStPauli
Freeza
baresi
Gil
che
_LMG_10_
Pedram
kiranr
Eivindo
JuvenelCuore
nichabr
FennecFox7
Arquitecto
Giuvitojuve
Sushi Master
OLpower
Great Leader Sprucenuce
The Franchise
El Chelsea Fuerte
Kevin_Muscat
BeautifulGame
chinomaster182
zizzle
The Madrid One
49 posters
Page 3 of 13
Page 3 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4 ... 11, 12, 13
Whats Your Take On Football?
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
point proven, you chose option 1. if you dont go for defensive football, then that means you dont think its winning football and you cant possibly role with option 2 more.Immaculate_Mole wrote:Look there is no " correct way to play football" there are many different styles but iam against defensive football in all its forms.
Same with attacking football no is no one absolute in dominating attacking football and Catenaccio was not all out defense like Park the Bus is there was atleast an attacking plan involved in the tactics.
So to end this i am fine with all styles of football except the park the bus tactics where the team using it is only really aiming to get a 0-0 draw.
Note: I am talking the variation of parking the bus where the team is only focused on getting a 0-0 draw.
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
The Madrid One wrote:point proven, you chose option 1. if you dont go for defensive football, then that means you dont think its winning football and you cant possibly role with option 2 more.Immaculate_Mole wrote:Look there is no " correct way to play football" there are many different styles but iam against defensive football in all its forms.
Same with attacking football no is no one absolute in dominating attacking football and Catenaccio was not all out defense like Park the Bus is there was atleast an attacking plan involved in the tactics.
So to end this i am fine with all styles of football except the park the bus tactics where the team using it is only really aiming to get a 0-0 draw.
Note: I am talking the variation of parking the bus where the team is only focused on getting a 0-0 draw.
It's winning football aslong as there's an attacking plan involved with the defensive tactics and that i have no issues with.
It's the eleven men behind the ball only playing for a 0-0 draw is what i dont like and tbh i dont see how anyone can like that.
Great Leader Sprucenuce- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 68989
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 34
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
i think that defensive football can beat attacking football though.Sushi Master wrote:I do not mind defensive tactics at all if they are employed reasonably.
People also underestimate the sexyness of a well executed counter attack. 3 passes and then a goal (Inter in CL win, Germany in the WC) can be just as good as 100 short passes to the goal line (Barcelona, Arsenal).
As usual, the extremes are not good at all. Very negative football with long balls to nowhere or praying for a set piece goal can become a borefest. A 1000 sideways and backward passes with no real end to them can be as annoying as a fat cockblock.
I guess I'm just a football whore.
michel platini is correct when he says that defense has always come on top of attack, chelsea,madrid, both victims of outside factrs, proving the only reason why they didnt win against barcelona. what did they label chelsea's and madrid's football as? anti football. my point is proven in every way just look down at history.
italy beat brazil
strategy can beat barcelona
and with the right mentality and good players people can rip spain into pieces.
(germany,italy)
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Depends, on a 2 leg encounter it makes perfect sence.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Yep. With your feet.
Giuvitojuve- Starlet
- Club Supported :
Posts : 759
Join date : 2011-06-10
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
its part of strategy mole. if you go for a 0-0, and then for a 1-1 or, 1-0 victory over a 2 leg encounter, the football on the mind wins.Immaculate_Mole wrote:The Madrid One wrote:point proven, you chose option 1. if you dont go for defensive football, then that means you dont think its winning football and you cant possibly role with option 2 more.Immaculate_Mole wrote:Look there is no " correct way to play football" there are many different styles but iam against defensive football in all its forms.
Same with attacking football no is no one absolute in dominating attacking football and Catenaccio was not all out defense like Park the Bus is there was atleast an attacking plan involved in the tactics.
So to end this i am fine with all styles of football except the park the bus tactics where the team using it is only really aiming to get a 0-0 draw.
Note: I am talking the variation of parking the bus where the team is only focused on getting a 0-0 draw.
It's winning football aslong as there's an attacking plan involved with the defensive tactics and that i have no issues with.
It's the eleven men behind the ball only playing for a 0-0 draw is what i dont like and tbh i dont see how anyone can like that.
why do you think heleno herrira once said.
WE HAVE WON THE MATCH BEFORE EVEN GETTING OFf THE BUS.
giovanni trappatoni- catenaccio ruled our defeat as far as possible, but after all catenaccio is only a method to simply defend and counter attack, which has been proven to work, no matter what its name.
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Balance, moderation and equilibrium.
These are the keys words that is the correct way of playing football as there is NO black and white.
Yes, football is meant to be pleasing to the eye... to an extent.
To the extent where the attractive football is installed and bred with tacts, intelligent play and strategy.
The ability to improvise, adapt and think on your feet. The ability to balance between defense and offense.
Examples of who mastered this?
Sacchi, Capello and Ancelotti's Milan. Lippi's Juve. Del Bosques' Spanish side. Brazil 2002.
Many more as I could go on.
These are the keys words that is the correct way of playing football as there is NO black and white.
Yes, football is meant to be pleasing to the eye... to an extent.
To the extent where the attractive football is installed and bred with tacts, intelligent play and strategy.
The ability to improvise, adapt and think on your feet. The ability to balance between defense and offense.
Examples of who mastered this?
Sacchi, Capello and Ancelotti's Milan. Lippi's Juve. Del Bosques' Spanish side. Brazil 2002.
Many more as I could go on.
Arquitecto- World Class Contributor
- Club Supported :
Posts : 12622
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
I agree 100%.
Brazil plays ultra attacking football, but they couldn't even get past the knockout stages in the copa. Same with argentina.
Paraguay on the other hand had very defensive tactics, and despite not having a very talented squad compared to the 2 SA giants, they still managed to get to the final.
Brazil plays ultra attacking football, but they couldn't even get past the knockout stages in the copa. Same with argentina.
Paraguay on the other hand had very defensive tactics, and despite not having a very talented squad compared to the 2 SA giants, they still managed to get to the final.
Last edited by Giggity5313 on Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
FennecFox7- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 7559
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 28
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Arquitecto wrote:Balance, moderation and equilibrium.
These are the keys words that is the correct way of playing football as there is NO black and white.
Yes, football is meant to be pleasing to the eye... to an extent.
To the extent where the attractive football is installed and bred with tacts, intelligent play and strategy.
The ability to improvise, adapt and think on your feet. The ability to balance between defense and offense.
Examples of who mastered this?
Sacchi, Capello and Ancelotti's Milan. Lippi's Juve. Del Bosques' Spanish side. Brazil 2002.
Many more as I could go on.
its obvious, the football has to work tactically, if it looks great then beautiful.
my point is that the philosopohy and tactics are what count.
look at arsenal they play like barca but dont THINK like barca.
and look at their trophy case difference since 2006.
what would arsenal or even barca do against a team they cant even score A GOAL AGAINST?
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Sure, defensive football can beat offensive. Most of the time at least, and it's easier to implement nowadays with everyone being physical. But, if you're good enough at attacking, you can beat anything as Ajax and Barcelona have shown us. Most great sides have had a balance between offense and defense, though. Or at least incredible mental strength.The Madrid One wrote:i think that defensive football can beat attacking football though.Sushi Master wrote:I do not mind defensive tactics at all if they are employed reasonably.
People also underestimate the sexyness of a well executed counter attack. 3 passes and then a goal (Inter in CL win, Germany in the WC) can be just as good as 100 short passes to the goal line (Barcelona, Arsenal).
As usual, the extremes are not good at all. Very negative football with long balls to nowhere or praying for a set piece goal can become a borefest. A 1000 sideways and backward passes with no real end to them can be as annoying as a fat cockblock.
I guess I'm just a football whore.
michel platini is correct when he says that defense has always come on top of attack, chelsea,madrid, both victims of outside factrs, proving the only reason why they didnt win against barcelona. what did they label chelsea's and madrid's football as? anti football. my point is proven in every way just look down at history.
italy beat brazil
strategy can beat barcelona
and with the right mentality and good players people can rip spain into pieces.
(germany,italy)
Spain can sure be taken down, but it's still a work in progress. Yesterday's defeat against Italy doesn't change anything. We'll see at the Euros and in Brazil.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
football is an even game and no one philospohy will win 100 percent of the time, but deciding which philosophy is best is not the point of the thread.Sushi Master wrote:Sure, defensive football can beat offensive. Most of the time at least, and it's easier to implement nowadays with everyone being physical. But, if you're good enough at attacking, you can beat anything as Ajax and Barcelona have shown us. Most great sides have had a balance between offense and defense, though. Or at least incredible mental strength.The Madrid One wrote:i think that defensive football can beat attacking football though.Sushi Master wrote:I do not mind defensive tactics at all if they are employed reasonably.
People also underestimate the sexyness of a well executed counter attack. 3 passes and then a goal (Inter in CL win, Germany in the WC) can be just as good as 100 short passes to the goal line (Barcelona, Arsenal).
As usual, the extremes are not good at all. Very negative football with long balls to nowhere or praying for a set piece goal can become a borefest. A 1000 sideways and backward passes with no real end to them can be as annoying as a fat cockblock.
I guess I'm just a football whore.
michel platini is correct when he says that defense has always come on top of attack, chelsea,madrid, both victims of outside factrs, proving the only reason why they didnt win against barcelona. what did they label chelsea's and madrid's football as? anti football. my point is proven in every way just look down at history.
italy beat brazil
strategy can beat barcelona
and with the right mentality and good players people can rip spain into pieces.
(germany,italy)
Spain can sure be taken down, but it's still a work in progress. Yesterday's defeat against Italy doesn't change anything. We'll see at the Euros and in Brazil.
the point of the thread is to get everyone to accept ALL types of philosophy.
and anyways what would the best attackers in the world do against a team they cant score against? frustration to its best.
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
The Madrid One wrote:its part of strategy mole. if you go for a 0-0, and then for a 1-1 or, 1-0 victory over a 2 leg encounter, the football on the mind wins.Immaculate_Mole wrote:The Madrid One wrote:point proven, you chose option 1. if you dont go for defensive football, then that means you dont think its winning football and you cant possibly role with option 2 more.Immaculate_Mole wrote:Look there is no " correct way to play football" there are many different styles but iam against defensive football in all its forms.
Same with attacking football no is no one absolute in dominating attacking football and Catenaccio was not all out defense like Park the Bus is there was atleast an attacking plan involved in the tactics.
So to end this i am fine with all styles of football except the park the bus tactics where the team using it is only really aiming to get a 0-0 draw.
Note: I am talking the variation of parking the bus where the team is only focused on getting a 0-0 draw.
It's winning football aslong as there's an attacking plan involved with the defensive tactics and that i have no issues with.
It's the eleven men behind the ball only playing for a 0-0 draw is what i dont like and tbh i dont see how anyone can like that.
why do you think heleno herrira once said.
WE HAVE WON THE MATCH BEFORE EVEN GETTING OFf THE BUS.
giovanni trappatoni- catenaccio ruled our defeat as far as possible, but after all catenaccio is only a method to simply defend and counter attack, which has been proven to work, no matter what its name.
2 legged encounter i agree, but i have seen occasions where teams set up to draw 0-0 from the start in one off games.
Which i dont agree with, we also have to realise that football is an entertainment business but having said defensive football can be entertaining if as i said theres an attacking plan involved with defensive tactics.
For example Inter v Barca at San Siro was entertaining, as i said i dont feel there's one absolute in football styles they all have thier place and time to be used.
I just dont agree with parking the bus for a 0-0 draw in a one off game.
Great Leader Sprucenuce- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 68989
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 34
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
we can talk about it the whole day mole but in the end, just because it looks destructively anti-football it shouldnt be played huh?Immaculate_Mole wrote:The Madrid One wrote:its part of strategy mole. if you go for a 0-0, and then for a 1-1 or, 1-0 victory over a 2 leg encounter, the football on the mind wins.Immaculate_Mole wrote:The Madrid One wrote:point proven, you chose option 1. if you dont go for defensive football, then that means you dont think its winning football and you cant possibly role with option 2 more.Immaculate_Mole wrote:Look there is no " correct way to play football" there are many different styles but iam against defensive football in all its forms.
Same with attacking football no is no one absolute in dominating attacking football and Catenaccio was not all out defense like Park the Bus is there was atleast an attacking plan involved in the tactics.
So to end this i am fine with all styles of football except the park the bus tactics where the team using it is only really aiming to get a 0-0 draw.
Note: I am talking the variation of parking the bus where the team is only focused on getting a 0-0 draw.
It's winning football aslong as there's an attacking plan involved with the defensive tactics and that i have no issues with.
It's the eleven men behind the ball only playing for a 0-0 draw is what i dont like and tbh i dont see how anyone can like that.
why do you think heleno herrira once said.
WE HAVE WON THE MATCH BEFORE EVEN GETTING OFf THE BUS.
giovanni trappatoni- catenaccio ruled our defeat as far as possible, but after all catenaccio is only a method to simply defend and counter attack, which has been proven to work, no matter what its name.
2 legged encounter i agree, but i have seen occasions where teams set up to draw 0-0 from the start in one off games.
Which i dont agree with, we also have to realise that football is an entertainment business but having said defensive football can be entertaining if as i said theres an attacking plan involved with defensive tactics.
For example Inter v Barca at San Siro was entertaining, as i said i dont feel there's one absolute in football styles they all have thier place and time to be used.
I just dont agree with parking the bus for a 0-0 draw in a one off game.
the poll speaks for itself
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
I did'nt say it should'nt be played i would just prefer to see defensive football with an attacking plan.
Great Leader Sprucenuce- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 68989
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 34
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
What about a smaller side against a huge rival who if you opened up would rape you?Immaculate_Mole wrote:I did'nt say it should'nt be played i would just prefer to see defensive football with an attacking plan.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
the only teams whose football i cant stand is barca and spain how they even call it attacking "beautiful football" i have no clue...most boring football ive ever seen no matter how effective it is...id even prefer watching greece04 ahead of them...
nichabr- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1251
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
sciacca wrote:Defense > Attack
Italians do it best.
+1. Italia. <3
JuvenelCuore- Banned (Permanent)
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4224
Join date : 2011-06-12
Age : 31
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
What about Brazil, though? They're more an attack oriented side yet still very successful.sciacca wrote:Defense > Attack
Italians do it best.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Platini: "Defense was always victorious against Attack"
1982: Italy vs Brazil = Defense Won
1994: Italy v Brazil = Shootouts won
1982: Italy vs Brazil = Defense Won
1994: Italy v Brazil = Shootouts won
Guest- Guest
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Brazil has insane amount of talent attacking wiseSushi Master wrote:What about Brazil, though? They're more an attack oriented side yet still very successful.sciacca wrote:Defense > Attack
Italians do it best.
FennecFox7- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 7559
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 28
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
believe me barca would get raped by the greatest italian teams in history.
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Brazil: 5 WCsciacca wrote:Platini: "Defense was always victorious against Attack"
1982: Italy vs Brazil = Defense Won
1994: Italy v Brazil = Shootouts won
Italy: 4 WC
I'm not debating defensive football's strengths, just that if you're very frakking good at attacking, it has it's benefits.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
Sushi Master wrote:Brazil: 5 WCsciacca wrote:Platini: "Defense was always victorious against Attack"
1982: Italy vs Brazil = Defense Won
1994: Italy v Brazil = Shootouts won
Italy: 4 WC
I'm not debating defensive football's strengths, just that if you're very frakking good at attacking, it has it's benefits.
Admittedly 2002 was a toss-up due to Korea's cheating, so it could have gone either way realistically, but that is neither here nor there.
JuvenelCuore- Banned (Permanent)
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4224
Join date : 2011-06-12
Age : 31
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
there are many ways to play the game sushi, and no way will beat the other 100 percent of the time. but you got to look at the most complete way and ask your self..
how are you going to win against a team you cant score against?
how are you going to win against a team you cant score against?
The Madrid One- "Imaybeonthesideoftheangels..."
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4939
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30
Re: Is There A "Correct" Way To Play Football?
True, that Italy squad was awesome but Ronaldo was just out of this world back then.JuvenelCuore wrote:Sushi Master wrote:Brazil: 5 WCsciacca wrote:Platini: "Defense was always victorious against Attack"
1982: Italy vs Brazil = Defense Won
1994: Italy v Brazil = Shootouts won
Italy: 4 WC
I'm not debating defensive football's strengths, just that if you're very frakking good at attacking, it has it's benefits.
Admittedly 2002 was a toss-up due to Korea's cheating, so it could have gone either way realistically, but that is neither here nor there.
Sushi Master- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Page 3 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4 ... 11, 12, 13
Similar topics
» Starting to play football
» Pretty much sure most of you here play football..
» Will Barca still play the same type of football once Messi retires?
» How can some players smoke and still be able to play professional football
» Does Roma play the most entertaining football in the world?
» Pretty much sure most of you here play football..
» Will Barca still play the same type of football once Messi retires?
» How can some players smoke and still be able to play professional football
» Does Roma play the most entertaining football in the world?
Page 3 of 13
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 7:47 am by rincon
» The Official Real Madrid 23 - 24 Matchday Thread
Today at 6:56 am by futbol_bill
» Premier League 2024/25
Today at 6:38 am by Clutch
» Ligue 1 2023/24
Today at 4:57 am by Thimmy
» The US Politics Thread
Yesterday at 6:35 pm by BarcaLearning
» La Liga 2024/25
Yesterday at 3:13 pm by farfan
» Introduce yourself to the community - Topic 2
Yesterday at 10:28 am by Myesyats
» Serie A 2024/2025
Yesterday at 8:25 am by rincon
» Cristiano Ronaldo is the GREATEST OF ALL TIME. Now Sit down and STFU
Yesterday at 7:01 am by BarcaLearning
» Lamine Yamal Hype thread
Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:59 pm by BarcaLearning
» Barca '24-'25 under Flick
Sun Sep 15, 2024 8:56 pm by Myesyats
» The Official Late Night TV thread.
Sun Sep 15, 2024 7:49 pm by Myesyats
» Erling Haaland
Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:29 pm by Myesyats