As we come closer to August, 3 personalities appear clearly on the horizon. Based on rumours, opinions, articles, experts, etc, we are likely to get 1 or 2 of these 3 guys. So, if this happens, what will be the best combination to play?

Can all of these 3 play an LM?

Who is the best at AM position?

Who will fit better?

Grande_Milano wrote:As we come closer to August, 3 personalities appear clearly on the horizon. Based on rumours, opinions, articles, experts, etc, we are likely to get 1 or 2 of these 3 guys. So, if this happens, what will be the best combination to play?

Can all of these 3 play an LB?

Who is the best at AM position?

Who will fit better?

lolwut?

But anywho, I think Hamsik and Ganso would be the best signings.
Versatile. Talented. Fit into Allegri's plans.

Pastore would be wasted if used outside the hole, however Ganso and Hamsik could both operate in a deeper role, though I personally feel that AM is also Hamsik's best position. If pressed to utilise two then I would personally prefer Pastore and Ganso, though it would almost certainly lead to Boateng being dropped until he improves his positional discipline at RCM.

Hamsik is the only one I think that would work in this team, but we'll end up signing Montolivo, who fits in more then any of the 3 listed.

the three could work in any order they a very talented and there talents can compliment each other

A christmas tree (4-3-2-1) would fit them all in I believe.

Pastore and Ganso behind the striker, and Hamsik is in the "3" (not so sure if he'll play well there though).

I doubt we will sign more than one. I'd like to see boateng at LCM and our new signing at AM, that would be the best solution imo

Truth is, we can only sign ganso(january) moreover, it would be dumb to sign more than one of them since they are all AMs. I know some would say that hamsik and ganso can play CM, but why don't we get a proper CM instead of modifing thier natural AM instincts to suit a CM.

Truth is, we can only sign ganso(january) moreover, it would be dumb to sign more than one of them since they are all AMs. I know some would say that hamsik and ganso can play CM, but why don't we get a proper CM instead of modifing thier natural AM instincts to suit a CM.

cripsy dipsy wrote:Truth is, we can only sign ganso(january) moreover, it would be dumb to sign more than one of them since they are all AMs. I know some would say that hamsik and ganso can play CM, but why don't we get a proper CM instead of modifing thier natural AM instincts to suit a CM.

Sort of like Boateng, he's a natural CAM after all.

Only Pastore can't play as LCM.

The best at AM? I think they are different each other. Pastore is an excellent dribbler, good passer, similiar to Kaka, but not as fast, not as good. Ganso is a playmaker, while Hamsik is the most rounded player compared to Ganso and Pastore, a threat from long distance.

All of them will fit here I guess. Ganso is Brazilian, he will fit here no matter what, while Pastore and Hamsik has used to Serie A.

Personally, I prefer Ganso.

fadjriemilan wrote:Only Pastore can't play as LCM.

The best at AM? I think they are different each other. Pastore is an excellent dribbler, good passer, similiar to Kaka, but not as fast, not as good. Ganso is a playmaker, while Hamsik is the most rounded player compared to Ganso and Pastore, a threat from long distance.

All of them will fit here I guess. Ganso is Brazilian, he will fit here no matter what, while Pastore and Hamsik has used to Serie A.

Personally, I prefer Ganso.

El Shaarawy is drawing Kaka comparisons
Though the Pharoah isn't as good as Pastore, Javier is not needed anyway

Montolivo and Ganso I'd be excited about.

Milantildeath wrote:Montolivo and Ganso I'd be excited about.

And the players we'll probably be signing by the looks of it.
But since both of these players can play in central midfield also, this will give Cassano and El Shaarawy a chance at AM.

Montolivo and Ganso looks to be a real possibility, I'm all in for that!