El Shaarawy wrote:Immobile>United
Chciha>Sevilla

imo

Just a wild guess ?
Never been linked.

I am kinda bored and dont have much to do, so to kill time will simply try to elicit some things. Bear with me.   or if otherwise just skip it.

Odds in favor

i) Being an Italian and if we get Darmian it might not be a bad idea as that will help him settle far quicker.

ii) Someone like Immobile might be willing to play second fiddle to rooney, which is actually a valid notion cos if we get a proven goalscorer who is better than rooney and if he then demand to start ahead of rooney as a lone striker, even still rooney wont be dropped as he is the bloody captain. He will take up a position in the midfield disrupting the balance of the squad. So lvg could be looking at player who is inferior to rooney right now who would be willing to be on the bench as his backup.  

Odds against

Well, rvp is getting sold and we will be in some shit if rooney wont deliver and might need a better player than immobile.

------------

I personally think we will go all out for Kane once we address our important positions. 50 + mil and who knows, might just squeeze a deal out of them.

El Shaarawy wrote:Roma make 11m bid for Sirigu

A little high for my liking given we're relatively ok in this position, but he's a long-term solution so it's a fair sum. He and De Sanctis would be excellent keeper depth.

Just 95% of the time you don't need keeper depth.

El Shaarawy wrote:Immobile>United
Chciha>Sevilla

imo

Kane or Lacazette imo

United most certainly needs a striker now (not that they didn't already even with Falcao and van Persie there ), or is top lad Wilson going to make the step up big time

El Gunner wrote:United most certainly needs a striker now (not that they didn't already even with Falcao and van Persie there ), or is top lad Wilson going to make the step up big time

Wilson will turn out to be another donkey like welbeck

It's interesting to see what United have in mind, not many top class strikers available out there. I'm guessing Charlie Austin.

We could always loan them Sanogo.

I don't think even Yanited will spend the 15m on Austin that QPR want, mainly because he's not that good.

Art Morte wrote:It's interesting to see what United have in mind, not many top class strikers available out there. I'm guessing Charlie Austin.

not at our level

Berbatov, Rooney, RVP, Tevez, Van Nistelrooy ain't nobody got time for Austin

Who in their right mind would bid more than 17.5m for Pedro

don't even like to see speculations on signing scrubs like immobile or austin plsgo

definitely need to sign someone though

I don't even want Austin and we have signed nobody lol.

Meh can't wait until this shitty window is closed. Has been pretty disappointing other than that week with Firmino for me.

Don't call me James wrote:Meh can't wait until this shitty window is closed. Has been pretty disappointing other than that week with Firmino for me.

http://www.goallegacy.net/t37808p666-the-official-summer-transfer-rumours-thread

Raptorgunner wrote:

MJ wrote:

Highburied wrote:@muzziozcan tweeted something which i cant copy and paste here ... Very interesting but how reliable?

Reddit working hard to pin some credibility on the guy.


https://www.reddit.com/r/Gunners/comments/3cmrbl/an_investigative_report_into_the_tweet_regarding/

yungheezy

this is some black belt google-fu. what a read

Di farzio says immobile to Sevilla is a done dealio

Art Morte wrote:Just 95% of the time you don't need keeper depth.

95% of the time most clubs don't have the problems we have with keeping players fit

Art Morte wrote:Just 95% of the time you don't need keeper depth.

Disagree. Both Chelsea and Liverpool needed to use their back up keepers during 14/15. Chelsea had depth and barely noticed the GK change, Liverpool was quite the opposite. Mignolet barely regained form after being dropped. I imagine he would have done much better with some competition and depth at GK.

GDM: Monaco & Roma move closer to agreement for striker Destro

Kick wrote:

Art Morte wrote:Just 95% of the time you don't need keeper depth.

Disagree. Both Chelsea and Liverpool needed to use their back up keepers during 14/15. Chelsea had depth and barely noticed the GK change, Liverpool was quite the opposite. Mignolet barely regained form after being dropped. I imagine he would have done much better with some competition and depth at GK.

Mignolet ONLY regained form after being dropped. He was leagues apart after his spell on the sidelines.

It wasn't straight away, though. I don't think he got his form back for a month or so after being dropped.

No, the improvement was pretty much immediate. It didn't take MUCH to improve over his form prior to being dropped, mind you, but it was noticeable as soon as he came back into the team that things had changed, with his form taking an upward turn and growing with each match.

GDM: Manchester United not only Darmian, also Schweinsteiger

Woodward

they also want messi doesnt mean it'll happen.

Just relaying the news

Also

Whats the point in buying Ramos or schweini at this point? They're close to being done and shelling out so much money is only doing good for bayern/Madrid. That's something only stupid English clubs would do. Paying tons of money for rejects of better clubs;.