Gil wrote:

Adit wrote:

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Yeah if EPL fans call Swansea 'good' football it says more about the league than the quality of Swansea. I was explaining why there was no fapping. United play unattractively, this is subjective but I'm sure 90% of people would agree that game was a complete bore, so no one gets excited about them. Hence, no fapping.

Agreed. Good football deserves special praise...Moyes and Mou fans obviously disagrees but who cares...

You barely beat a mediocre team yesterday bruh.

Quiet down.

and your team beasted on hullcelona....gtfo

S wrote:This good football thing :facepalm:I swear i've seen Mancini's team play good football but i dint see people mentioning that.Now that they have a coach who arrives from Lol Liga,everyone is expected to believe that Pellegrini has brought this 'new exciting brand of football' into City..

Exactly. lol

The Franchise wrote:I dont get the big debate lol

I dont think anyone saying City are better than Utd, all they saying it seems to me is they played a more attractive game...nothing more or less.

Why you mad doe?

Pellegrini revolutionizing the donkeyy league

They can play an attractive football, Roma also played an attractive football.

Easy win for City. The analysis and in depth discussion about the weekend games is what I was really waiting for.

jibers wrote:

The Franchise wrote:I dont get the big debate lol

I dont think anyone saying City are better than Utd, all they saying it seems to me is they played a more attractive game...nothing more or less.

Why you mad doe?

Pls go

brb poverty centermid lolz

Mediocre moyes first test will be against mou and his Chelsea boys, if they lose or draw at old Trafford then be will have to act in the transfer market which plays into evertons hands.
Moyes has never won any major trophy and will begin to crack when up against the big boys as he will feel the pressure from ferguson and stretfords end fans

these NBC pundits are unbearable btw....gtfo

NBC just said "He [Dzeko] will battle RVP for the golden boot"

Grooverider wrote:Mediocre moyes first test will be against mou and his Chelsea boys, if they lose or draw at old Trafford then be will have to act in the transfer market which plays into evertons hands.
Moyes has never won any major trophy and will begin to crack when up against the big boys as he will feel the pressure from ferguson and stretfords end fans

How do you know how will Moyes react? Maybe the pressure won't be a problem for him.

@B-Mac #lol-legacy

Pellegrini wants to build his team around Dzeko, doesn't he?

No one should pay any attention to how good or bad any team is until after 10 games.

You can't take anything from anyone until then.

jibers wrote:According to you. Barcelona play sleeping drug football. We walked the league last season and should have won it the season before. But somehow City are better

Gil wrote:Swansea would finish 4th in La Liga lol.

How many teams in Pl history have won while playing what hipsters deem to be good football?

Arsenal's invincibles who were massively overrated and underachieved seems to be the only exception in recent times.

I never said City were better or mentioned results, don't put words into my mouth. In this conversation I never claimed that attractive football is better or likelier to produce wins. I said that fans don't get excited about boring football.

You see fans here claiming that City will win the league because of the way they play rather than the result. You don't see that with United because their football is less attractive and thus less exciting, even if it's more efficient or better suited to the league.

M99 wrote:Zabaleta assist

plus clean sheet

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:No one should pay any attention to how good or bad any team is until after 10 games.

You can't take anything from anyone until then.

10 games is too long. that's past 1/4 of the season. After 5 games, you have a pretty good idea of what you're going to be...

Vlad the Impaler wrote:

Grooverider wrote:Mediocre moyes first test will be against mou and his Chelsea boys, if they lose or draw at old Trafford then be will have to act in the transfer market which plays into evertons hands.
Moyes has never won any major trophy and will begin to crack when up against the big boys as he will feel the pressure from ferguson and stretfords end fans

How do you know how will Moyes react? Maybe the pressure won't be a problem for him.

@B-Mac #lol-legacy

For me this is easy to answer

There is a huge difference in "we might be able to finish in the top six mr chairman"
Than "we've won the league"

The Franchise wrote:

jibers wrote:

The Franchise wrote:I dont get the big debate lol

I dont think anyone saying City are better than Utd, all they saying it seems to me is they played a more attractive game...nothing more or less.

Why you mad doe?

Pls go

brb poverty centermid lolz

Cleverly would walk into your first 11.

BarrileteCosmico wrote:

jibers wrote:According to you. Barcelona play sleeping drug football. We walked the league last season and should have won it the season before. But somehow City are better

Gil wrote:Swansea would finish 4th in La Liga lol.

How many teams in Pl history have won while playing what hipsters deem to be good football?

Arsenal's invincibles who were massively overrated and underachieved seems to be the only exception in recent times.

I never said City were better or mentioned results, don't put words into my mouth.  In this conversation I never claimed that attractive football is better or likelier to produce wins. I said that fans don't get excited about boring football.

You see fans here claiming that City will win the league because of the way they play rather than the result. You don't see that with United because their football is less attractive and thus less exciting, even if it's more efficient or better suited to the league.

Well, as I said before; I'd rather win the EPL with less attractive football than win the 4th place trophy with attractive football .

Grooverider wrote:

Vlad the Impaler wrote:

Grooverider wrote:Mediocre moyes first test will be against mou and his Chelsea boys, if they lose or draw at old Trafford then be will have to act in the transfer market which plays into evertons hands.
Moyes has never won any major trophy and will begin to crack when up against the big boys as he will feel the pressure from ferguson and stretfords end fans

How do you know how will Moyes react? Maybe the pressure won't be a problem for him.

@B-Mac #lol-legacy

For me this is easy to answer

There is a huge difference in "we might be able to finish in the top six mr chairman"
Than "we've won the league"

there's also a huge difference in Champions of England Manchester United Squad and Everton shoe string budget squad

Vlad the Impaler wrote:Well, as I said before; I'd rather win the EPL with less attractive football than win the 4th place trophy with attractive football .

Of course, so would I. But when people ask "How come when United won against a better team with a similar result no one made hyperbolic statements abuot them?" I think the answer is that they're not an exciting side. It gets boring to repeat myself, but I never claimed that attractive football has any relationship with getting the result you want, so I'm not sure why people are getting defensive and mentioning results.

jibers wrote:

The Franchise wrote:

jibers wrote:

The Franchise wrote:I dont get the big debate lol

I dont think anyone saying City are better than Utd, all they saying it seems to me is they played a more attractive game...nothing more or less.

Why you mad doe?

Pls go

brb poverty centermid lolz

Cleverly would walk into your first 11.

Clev would walk into Brazil 70' first 11

And all this shit about attractive football it's like the normalcy. Every person sees the normalcy in his own way.

I love Jamie Carragher. So much heart..

Thread blew up.

BarrileteCosmico wrote:

Vlad the Impaler wrote:Well, as I said before; I'd rather win the EPL with less attractive football than win the 4th place trophy with attractive football .

Of course, so would I. But when people ask "How come when United won against a better team with a similar result no one made hyperbolic statements abuot them?" I think the answer is that they're not an exciting side. It gets boring to repeat myself, but I never claimed that attractive football has any relationship with getting the result you want, so I'm not sure why people are getting defensive and mentioning results.

Why you mad doe??