Arquitescu wrote:

The_Badger wrote:It's a post responding to points raised in the thread.

Your utterly fallacious claim on Liverpool's PR stance instead of direct support for Luis Suarez, is testament to how you obviously did not follow our support for the player, who didn't have any qualms dragging his club through the mud.

BarrileteCosmico wrote:

mr-r34 wrote:

RedOranje wrote:It would appear John Cross was right, and I was wrong.  Bummer.

The transfer situation remains the same, though: transfer request AND £50+m bid required for a move to happen.

Really, if we don't get a 50 mil offer what do we do, surley this guy can't wear a red shirt ever again.

From his perspective it sounds like he has a legal case against you if you don't let him go.

El Shaarawy wrote:

RealGunner wrote:I just hope that IF we sign him, we put in a £60m buy out clause so we can make a profit on him in 2 years

VendettaRed07 wrote:If he only wanted to stay one more year, then what the **** is the logic in signing a four year deal?..

RealGunner wrote:I just hope that IF we sign him, we put in a £60m buy out clause so we can make a profit on him in 2 years

something-red wrote:Dick move, Luis.

Although I guess this is his final 'come and get me plea' to Madrid.

He'll play for Liverpool reserves before Arsenal. With or without a transfer request.

Also, Arsenal are the classiest team in England they said.

http://www.news-liverpoolfc.com/news/lfc-transfer-speculations/item/1893-photo-breaking-news-arsenal-official-site-showing-luis-su%C3%A1rez-transfer-to-the-club

Lex wrote:What was it that Brenton said about lacking class a few days ago?

Gil wrote:How is he a scumbag for wanting to leave? A player of his quality needs to be playing at the highest level.

I don't see how he lied by the way. He maintained he hates the English press even in this interview but he wants CL football.

He would f**k off to Madrid if they were interested but it seems Bale is their priority. Arsenal is the next best option because no other CL club is interested.

Gil wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

Gil wrote:How is he a scumbag for wanting to leave? A player of his quality needs to be playing at the highest level.

I don't see how he lied by the way. He maintained he hates the English press even in this interview but he wants CL football.

He would f**k off to Madrid if they were interested but it seems Bale is their priority. Arsenal is the next best option because no other CL club is interested.

" English Media are forcing me out i wouldn't leave Liverpool for any other English Club".

That sir is why he's a scumbag.

He gave the interview in his local tongue. Mistranslation brah.

stevieg8 wrote:

Lex wrote:What was it that Brenton said about lacking class a few days ago?

This isn't the first time I've seen this misspelling of Brendan... is there some slang aspect I'm missing, or is it just a misspelling for the sake of misspelling?  Usually these types of "nicknames" from rival fans have some sort of meaning to them, but this one just looks unintelligent to me... What am I missing?

The_Badger wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

Liverpool's whole "support" thing regarding the racism issue seemed more a forced and manipulative attempt to stick it to the media who questioned the club's stance rather than a genuine act of solidarity for Suarez.

If Rodgers and Liverpool did state he could leave if they failed to qualify for Europe then he can hardly be criticised for disloyalty when he'd been duped.

"We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no one else on the field – including Evra's own team-mates and all the match officials – heard the alleged conversation between two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner-kick was about to be taken," the statement said.

"It is our strong belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suárez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible – certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations."

"We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suárez has been characterised. It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suárez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November.

"Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suárez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name. We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suárez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms.

‘Ask a linguistic expert, and they will tell you that the part of the country in Uruguay where he [Luis Suárez] comes from, it is perfectly acceptable,’ argued the Scot.

‘His wife calls him that and I don’t think he is offended by her. We have made a statement and I think it is there for everybody to read. Luis has made a brilliant statement and we will stand by him.’