Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

by juventus101 Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:44 pm

Which pair do you think are better? If you think its still too early to judge Oscar, then use Mata in his place.

by Onyx Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:45 pm

Mata and Hazard > Cazorla and Podolski.

by Valkyrja Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:57 pm

Hazard and Oscar.

by Highburied Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:19 am

Hazard and Oscar have huge potential but atm Cazorla s** all over them.

by urbaNRoots Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:58 am

That duo will destroy us next week.

by VanDeezNuts Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:08 pm

mata hazard definitely better than cazorla podolski

but cazorla is the best of the 4

but if its oscar hazard v cazorla podolski then i have to go with the arsenal duo

by DuringTheWar Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:15 pm

if its cazorla and wilshere instead of podolski, which makes sense seeing how podolski is a different type of player to the others, then hasta la vista chelsea

by Ganso Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:11 pm

too early to judge,most people barely watched oscar and hazard.It will be really interesting to see this weekend's game,2 really strong midfields

by aleumdance Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:31 am

urbaNRoots wrote:That duo will destroy us next week.

mate, Chelsea would park

urbaNRoots wrote:That duo will destroy us next week.

the bUS, just like they did last season..

no offense to any chelsea fan but RDM can be tootless when the talk is tactics, Stoke did not even Bother parking the Bus against them, it was that bad, what let stoke down is proper finishing

by VivaStPauli Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:52 am

Hazard/Oscar are probably what most would call "better", but I'm pretty sure Poldi and Cazorla will score more, and work more defensively, at the same time.

by Le Samourai Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:45 pm

Cazorla best player - Podolski a functional complimentary piece.

Hazard and Oscar still have to prove themselves and what not.

by The Messiah Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:10 pm

There is no one single competition here, it's clearly Podolski and Cazorla. Podolski is obviously the best among the 5(including Mata)

by Guest Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:46 pm

Oscar and Hazard are too similar in my opinion, they'd be more appreciated if they are the focal points of two different teams. A striker midfielder partnership is always deadlier when compared to two attacking midfielders.
So Poldizorla.

by Ganso Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:03 pm

hazard and oscar arent similar imo.Oscar is a legit #10 while Hazard is much more explosive and plays better when wide

by Guest Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:09 pm

Hazard cannot be categorized as a traditional winger, he'd still be recognized as someone who provides the link between midfield and attack.Though Oscar can play cm,As you mentioned, he is a traditional 10, someone who provides the link between midfield and attack. So my opinion stands unchanged Smile

by Kick Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:36 pm

Hazard is poor through the centre. Oscar cannot play wide. They are completely different players.

And any attacking midfielders job is to provide a link between midfield and attack. It does make them somewhat similar but you could say the same about Zidane and Ronaldinho in that respect, despite the fact they are completely different players.

by Guest Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:03 am

That is exactly what I was trying to say, I think Hazard and Oscar won't work out for the same reason that Ronaldinho and Kaka didn't work at Milan.

by Kick Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:45 am

you're saying you can't have more than one link in each team? :facepalm:

by Guest Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:33 am

There is a difference between 'not having' and 'not working'

by LeBéninois Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:31 am

Chelsea duo lacks experience . that the main différence. equally talented or almost but for santi-podi is just the best duo atm

by rwo power Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:23 am

St.Poldi!

by Lunatic Fringe Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:39 am

arsenal were outplayed by chelsea on both occasions this season and hazard and oscar were excellent in both, i'm biased so i won't say but i wouldn't be surprised if most people voted for oscar and hazard.

by Sponsored content

Hitskin.com

Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla

Re: Hazard/Oscar vs Podolski/Cazorla