physically?yes mentally?no

I've read a bit into this guy and alot of what i've read says he doesn't live up to the hype. He'll do something special to satisfy people and make them overlook his downfalls, and alot of his best moments are against weak teams(3rd and 4th division brazil or something). Apparalenly he's very slow in making decisions and indecisive. No idea how true any of this is though. Pretty universally agreed that he's an amazing dribbler though.

Ganso whatever little I have seen is very average.

And Ayrton Senna said Bruno is faster than him. Look what piece of garbage Bruno Senna turned out to be.

lszanto wrote:I've read a bit into this guy and alot of what i've read says he doesn't live up to the hype. He'll do something special to satisfy people and make them overlook his downfalls, and alot of his best moments are against weak teams(3rd and 4th division brazil or something). Apparalenly he's very slow in making decisions and indecisive. No idea how true any of this is though. Pretty universally agreed that he's an amazing dribbler though.

that is not true at all

Manchester United, after all the rumours that have been disregarded, are after 19-year-old Lucas Moura. A €33 million bid was made and rejected. This week, a €38 million bid was made and, also, rejected. For a position that United do not need to strengthen on, it seems a bit peculiar that a risky bid would be put in.

Lucas is only 19-years-old, but has already established himself as a young prodigy. Ever since he made his debut for São Paulo in 2010, he has looked more and more confident with every game he has featured in – and has more importantly improved. He has electrifying pace, can more than easily beat his man one-on-one, great close control, good dribbling, and can score some great goals.

Whilst many – and I do not mean a minority – are formulating opinions based on footage they have viewed on YouTube, what these fans do not know is that Lucas is still very much raw and needs more time to improve. His decision making, for instance, has come under heavy criticism, which is justifiable. When he runs with the ball, he tends to cement his eyes on the ball and not look up, which subsequently results into chances being wasted. Another flaw is that he has never really made his mark in the big games.

Certainly, if I had to compare Lucas to another player, then it has to be Theo Walcott. Now you might think I am being absurd, but my explanation for this will win you over. What the former offers: more directness, tremendous amount of energy, close control, and better dribbling. Apart from that, both players have erratic decision making.

So, the important question: Do Manchester United need Lucas? No, they do not. The reason being is that United have other areas, which need to be reconstructed. Left back and central midfield are still weak areas, and it would be a very risky move to pay such an excessive amount. It is best for Lucas to stay put, and progress even further, where he will receive first-team action.

Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

Zealous wrote:Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

You're getting merked, if that happens, bruv.

Zealous wrote:Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

Man United has never let us down so we could safely say they would nurture him with care.

If we Ferguson acquiesces to his greedy ways and then we end up buying him and making him the focal point of our attack.

:I'mveryunoriginal:

II Capitano wrote:

Zealous wrote:Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

You're getting merked, if that happens, bruv.

We've got cash to burn and you should be thanking us for servicing your debt.

Thought it may have been a bias/wrong source, guess I wanted it to be true as he's linked to united

We tried to help Meelan like that but they are still in debt

maybe we should give kaka back, it might help. We will send Ronnie back when we are done too trololololololol

Zealous wrote:Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

You get him when we say you can.

You can have Bebe if you want.

RED 80s. wrote:

Zealous wrote:Lucas is still far from complete so I hope he develops at United for when we eventually sign him.

You get him when we say you can.

You can have Bebe if you want.

Madrid can easily get any player they want that doesn't play for Barca.

Either Hazard or Lucas maybe even both will play for Madrid once Ronaldo declines if Neymar goes to Barca as expected.

^ That's a myth.

RED 80s. wrote:^ That's a myth.

This.

Especially if Mourinho is no longer at Madrid by that time.

why buy Lucas when Jese is better? trololololol

Barrettinator wrote:

RED 80s. wrote:^ That's a myth.

This.

Especially if Mourinho is no longer at Madrid by that time.

What does Mourinhio have to do with anything?looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

RED 80s. wrote:^ That's a myth.

They got Zidane, Ronaldo, Figo, Beckham etc in one summer. Ronaldo, Benzema, Alonso, Kaka etc a decade later.

It really isn't.

Le Samourai wrote:

Barrettinator wrote:

RED 80s. wrote:^ That's a myth.

This.

Especially if Mourinho is no longer at Madrid by that time.

What does Mourinhio have to do with anything?looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

Yea tell me how many world class players were wishing to play for Madrid post-galacticos/pre CR7 & Mou.

Apparently he's turned down both Madrid and inter to Join us.. Madrid are a 1 galatico team, who do they have that you look at and say damn we wish we had him
Ozil? Wouldn't kagawa be a galatico signing over angerman wih all the commercial upside etc?
Lucas over do Maria?
Who have Madrid actually prised away that they forced a club to sell?
Madrid choosing who they want is a myth.. You think real sit there and refuse to buy cheap so they can get robbed later on for a ridiculous fee?

Angerman is meant to be German btw lol...

it wont work for him in la liga

its better if he goes to BPL, poor man's valencia
he will take advantage of his speed to supass his opponents etc etc..

Barrettinator wrote:

Le Samourai wrote:

Barrettinator wrote:

RED 80s. wrote:^ That's a myth.

This.

Especially if Mourinho is no longer at Madrid by that time.

What does Mourinhio have to do with anything?looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

Yea tell me how many world class players were wishing to play for Madrid post-galacticos/pre CR7 & Mou.

You can't be serious with this garbage.

Robinhio
Cassano
Canavaro
Van Nistelrooj
Diarra
Robben(Left Mou)
Sneijder
Van Der Vaart

And a range of other highly rated youngsters such as Higuain ,Marcelo et al joined Madrid during that period with a idiot like Calderon at the helm and scrubs like Luxembergo coaching.

Please tell me this is some sort of joke.

Mourinhio? Ronaldo?

[quote="Gil"][quote="RED 80s."]^ That's a myth.[/quote]

They got Zidane, Ronaldo, Figo, Beckham etc in one summer. Ronaldo, Benzema, Alonso, Kaka etc a decade later.

It really isn't.[/quote]
all for ridiculous fees, they were man city bEfore city were here, being raped over transfer fees are not the same as getting who they want.
The way people talk you'd think these players walked over broken glass to join That lot
Zidanes wife wanted the sun
Figo was blackmailed
Beckham forced out
Ronaldo back a few months from being a year plus out of action with rumours of his wife sleeping with an inter employee
Madrid were the only big spenders in town, it's ridiculous that they got taken advantage of so easily

Whatever Cyberman just make sure Lucas is ready when he signs for us.