Di Maria

Lionel Messi wrote:
Thread topic: Di Maria
only posts talking about Messi are yours, thread derail, if I'm not mistaken, you're on thin ice, I wouldn't be so comfortable making fun of others getting banned if I was you.

thin ice-whhhaat??

I am not anything. I posted a video. I didn't insult anyone.

Since when did you become a mod though, lulz?

And my Messi post IS relevant. Just because it's a thread about Di Maria does not mean I can't discuss other players.

Especially when that other player was the only diver in today's game. (Hence the thread connection).

Now move along...

OK, you got the attention you wanted and needed, so can you leave the thread? You're the only one supporting anything you're saying.

kiranr wrote:Counter point to Di Maria diving is Messi diving.

1) Di Maria didn't dive (there is no proof of it yet).

2) I only saw one clear dive this game. (From Messi)


It's not quantum physics.

dnmac4 wrote:OK, you got the attention you wanted and needed, so can you leave the thread? You're the only one supporting anything you're saying.

I am LOOKING for a debate...

How about you substantiate what you set out to prove in this thread.

Di Maria *pathetically" going down easy/ Di Maria diving 4-5 times.

Prove it...

Seppuku wrote:

Lionel Messi wrote:
Thread topic: Di Maria
only posts talking about Messi are yours, thread derail, if I'm not mistaken, you're on thin ice, I wouldn't be so comfortable making fun of others getting banned if I was you.

thin ice-whhhaat??

I am not anything. I posted a video. I didn't insult anyone.

Since when did you become a mod though, lulz?

And my Messi post IS relevant. Just because it's a thread about Di Maria does not mean I can't discuss other players.

Especially when that other player was the only diver in today's game. (Hence the thread connection).

Now move along...

me a mod? No, but just to let you know, you're in a group called 'thin iceland'

That right there is the meaning of derailing a thread.

"Did it seem like Di Maria's number one job tonight was not to get hurt? I know he's good and his goal was a bullet, and he does have a rep for diving but tonight he played EXTRA soft. It was hard to watch. Even so, he was 200 times better then Lavezzi."

That is the original post. YOU brought up diving. This is a football forum, so I am pretty sure people watch football. That means no one else in this thread or on this forum are arguing that he played soft. This either means you didn't watch the game or your a fanboy. The only other option is your too dumb to understand what's going on and when someone puts a thread up you just reply with Messi hating. I am banking on option 1 or 3.

Seppuku wrote:

kiranr wrote:Counter point to Di Maria diving is Messi diving.

1) Di Maria didn't dive (there is no proof of it yet).

2) I only saw one clear dive this game. (From Messi)


It's not quantum physics.

Point 2 is irrelevant to this thread. And you also posted a video of it. It is quite obvious you have almost zero intention of sticking up for Di Maria!

And now I'm bored of going in circles with 12 year olds who watch cartoons with IQ's less then there age. So I'm leaving my thread, do with it what you like it can only get better from here.

kiranr wrote:

Seppuku wrote:

kiranr wrote:Counter point to Di Maria diving is Messi diving.

1) Di Maria didn't dive (there is no proof of it yet).

2) I only saw one clear dive this game. (From Messi)


It's not quantum physics.

Point 2 is irrelevant to this thread. And you also posted a video of it. It is quite obvious you have almost zero intention of sticking up for Di Maria!

Huh??

For the umpteenth time I am asking you lot to PROVE Di Maria dived. How is that not "sticking up for Di Maria"?

The 2nd point IS relevant. Because Messi was the only diver in the game (according to me).

Now...You have to prove me wrong...

Simplez...

dnmac4 wrote:And now I'm bored of going in circles with 12 year olds who watch cartoons with IQ's less then there age. So I'm leaving my thread, do with it what you like it can only get better from here.

That's very gracious of you...

Now show me where Di Maria dived..

Seppuku wrote:

kiranr wrote:

Seppuku wrote:

kiranr wrote:Counter point to Di Maria diving is Messi diving.

1) Di Maria didn't dive (there is no proof of it yet).

2) I only saw one clear dive this game. (From Messi)


It's not quantum physics.

Point 2 is irrelevant to this thread. And you also posted a video of it. It is quite obvious you have almost zero intention of sticking up for Di Maria!

Huh??

For the umpteenth time I am asking you lot to PROVE Di Maria dived. How is that not "sticking up for Di Maria"?

The 2nd point IS relevant. Because Messi was the only diver in the game (according to me).

Now...You have to prove me wrong...

Simplez...

We all know that. Messi dived! We are not talking about that now are we? We are talking about Di Maria. Posting a video of Messi diving does not prove Di Maria did not dive.

Like you said, it is not quantum Physics!

don't contribute to seppuku's attempts to derail the thread/troll, just try to stay on topic

I want Di Marias counting imaginary fouls and dives with his fingers while sitting on the ground, trying to unfairly get a player booked, in FIFA 12.

seppuku stay on topic please.

whats the point of this thread again? lol

What were the two other goals like? Worth watching? i only saw Di Marias goal.

Also, you realise you guys are arguing about whether or not someone was talking about the issue, rather than the issue itself. If messi dived, he dived. No need to take offense at people commenting on it.

no comment to it..

The xcx wrote:That Di Maria is a diver. Big whoop, barcelona does it every game or so.

Obviously you do not understand the contention of the topic, the contention was not on whether Di Maria dived or not, its whether he played extra soft or not, the Barca's comment does not fit into either reasons or objections so its obviously its not on topic and you are butthurt.

To that seppuku dude, you said others have poor argument skills, maybe you can do a search on google on whats argument mapping. As mentioned the contention is whether di maria played extra soft, you "messi dived" comment isn't a "reason for contention", nor a "reason for reason", nor a "objection for reason" or any components of the objection claim. hence u added absolutely nothing towards or against the contention...but then again this is AT LEAST college level stuff, so some younglings might not know it....

Di maria played hell soft today, only reason his not getting slaughtered is because of the 3-0 win and his bullet goal...theirs no denying the guys a pansy lol...his still better than lavezzi..would be in my XI anyday

against a u-23 costa rica, it's nothing more than obligation to win like that...

rsinatra wrote:against a u-23 costa rica, it's nothing more than obligation to win like that...

Maybe its true...but again...nothing to do with D.M being soft lol..lets see what Brazil can do now shall we =)

no, no, i just didnt find any other thread about last night's win .. kudos to DM and to the team for winning..

the team we'll face is 2x as strong as costa rica, but hopefully we'll get a win too

rsinatra wrote:no, no, i just didnt find any other thread about last night's win .. kudos to DM and to the team for winning..

the team we'll face is 2x as strong as costa rica, but hopefully we'll get a win too

You can always start a new one lol, good luck for Brazil's match, a copa without Brazil is 1/2 meh...

I actually saw nothing really out of the ordinary in Di Maria last night. Does this really bother ppl?!