milan is the worst team in the champions league clearly...the players shouldn't express their opinions because it will lead to them being belittled and others calling them deluded...

Milan are a good team but really Thiago Silva should at least wait till Milan are in the semi-finals before he pulls out any "best in Europe" remarks.

But it's not just him Allegri said something similar before the group stage draw. You gotta pay your dues before you can run your mouth.

Oh hey, a comparison thread... don't we have a separate dedicated section for this?

Why yes, yes we do.

RedOranje wrote:Oh hey, a comparison thread... don't we have a separate dedicated section for this?

Why yes, yes we do.

RedOranje wrote:Oh hey, a comparison thread... don't we have a separate dedicated section for this?

Why yes, yes we do.

king

Zealous wrote:Milan are a good team but really Thiago Silva should at least wait till Milan are in the semi-finals before he pulls out any "best in Europe" remarks.

But it's not just him Allegri said something similar before the group stage draw. You gotta pay your dues before you can run your mouth.

ok then schalke=real madrid.....that makes alot of sense right?

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Bayern > United > City > Madrid > Milan

as it stands I would agree with this statement.

Bayern must be the most ridiculously underrated team on this forum.

zarola wrote:

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Bayern > United > City > Madrid > Milan

as it stands I would agree with this statement.

Bayern must be the most ridiculously underrated team on this forum.

Respect

I'd also agree with Alfred's math, although I'd switch City for Madrid.

Math is based on numbers
and numbers don't lie
therefore math doesn't lie

My math is correct, according to a very reputable source in this forum
Math doesn't lie
Therefore, I am right, bitches.

Zealous wrote:TROLOLOLOLOLOL ^^^^^^^^

Take your trolling elsewhere, my assessment is an adequate solution to the question at hand.

What's up with Milan?

Didn't one of their big guys also say that they were only second to Barcelona?

Cookie Monster wrote:

jibers wrote:Teams ahead of Milan at this moment in time: Barcelona, Manchester United, Manchester City, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Chelsea...

Really? Chelsea?

Also, Milan's attack >>>>> Bayern's attack, Milan' defense >>>>> Bayern's defense, Milan overall > Bayern overall.

The other four teams are definitely ahead of Milan but seriously to say that bayern and chelsea are better is kind of insulting...

Chelsea would rape Milan any day.

Wow.

Can someone tell me what Bayern has done to prove they are superior to Milan?

I know they are better and all with their fancy new manager but last I heard, they were knocked out by Inter in the CL led by Leonardo.

And don't give me crap about Van Gaal as he is reputable and solid manager.


What the hell has city proven other then scoring against lower teams with turkey defenses?

Last I heard, they were knocked out by DYNAMO KIEV! A team who did not even win their own league.


And Chelsea? cause they've done so much to impress. GTFO.

Chelsea would rape Milan any day.

Come up with something better here. Your wouldn't even convince your granny with this.

Arquitecto wrote:Wow.

Can someone tell me what Bayern has done to prove they are superior to Milan?

I know they are better and all with their fancy new manager but last I heard, they were knocked out by Inter in the CL led by Leonardo.

And don't give me crap about Van Gaal as he is reputable and solid manager.


What the hell has city proven other then scoring against lower teams with turkey defenses?

Last I heard, they were knocked out by DYNAMO KIEV! A team who did not even win their own league.


And Chelsea? cause they've done so much to impress. GTFO.

Chelsea would rape Milan any day.

Come up with something better here. Your wouldn't even convince your granny with this.

My granny doesn't even watch football. :bom:

An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Average defence.

7 goals conceded in the last 18 league matches of last season, just wait until we're fit again.

Sneak past WBA.

Would "rape" Milan.

Barcelona, Madrid and United are the only teams strong enough to lay waste to a great team.

The others, Bayern, Chelsea, Milan, Inter, City, Arsenal, Dortmund, Porto and the like, are fairly even and in a round robin would show their general equality. A few blow-outs would occur as is natural, but as an average, the teams would find they weren't too far apart.

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Magricos wrote: To say Bayern is better than Milan is not insulting.

Lol yeah it really is

english_jewel wrote: Chelsea would rape Milan any day.

Ugh

It's your opinion I guess.... Too bad your opinion is false

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Prove me wrong.

You're all saying you are so much better yet I don't see anybody giving any reasons?

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Prove me wrong.

You're all saying you are so much better yet I don't see anybody giving any reasons?

When a debate is layed upon the table, the one who lays the challenge is the one who lays his reasons to prevail in his debate.

Who said so much better?

You saying Milan has average defense is strike 1.

You layed the debate and now bring your points forward.

Highly doubt Milan defense would be able to handle Sturridge and Mata.

Hopefully we meet anyhow.

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Prove me wrong.

You're all saying you are so much better yet I don't see anybody giving any reasons?

When a debate is layed upon the table, the one who lays the challenge is the one who lays his reasons to prevail in his debate.

Who said so much better?

You saying Milan has average defense is strike 1.

You layed the debate and now bring your points forward.

sorry did not realise we were in a courtroom.

Defense. Cole > Tawio. Terry > Nesta. Luiz = Silva. Bosingwa = Abate.

english_jewel wrote:Highly doubt Milan defense would be able to handle Sturridge and Mata.

Hopefully we meet anyhow.

Do you have any idea what attacks this Milan defense has withheld?


And then you bring Mata and Strurridge?

Quite insulting to the defense.

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Prove me wrong.

You're all saying you are so much better yet I don't see anybody giving any reasons?

When a debate is layed upon the table, the one who lays the challenge is the one who lays his reasons to prevail in his debate.

Who said so much better?

You saying Milan has average defense is strike 1.

You layed the debate and now bring your points forward.

sorry did not realise we were in a courtroom.

Defense. Cole > Tawio. Terry > Nesta. Luiz = Silva. Bosingwa = Abate.

Not a courtroom.

Just proper discussion.

You have literally shot your self in the foot with a howitzer.

Seriously, I'll let Dosto respond as hopefully he will have the patience to completely destroy that piece of genius you just came up with.

Arquitecto wrote:

english_jewel wrote:Highly doubt Milan defense would be able to handle Sturridge and Mata.

Hopefully we meet anyhow.

Do you have any idea what attacks this Milan defense has withheld?

Like who's?

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

lszanto wrote:An under performing Chelsea team would still beat Milan yet their fans are "offended" that people are saying we are better than them... Average defence, average midfield and a strong forward line, but only if Ibrahimovic decides to turn up...

Nobody is offended.

Yet nobody is convinced.

Your ignorance here is enough to make me cringe.

Back your statement up.

Prove me wrong.

You're all saying you are so much better yet I don't see anybody giving any reasons?

When a debate is layed upon the table, the one who lays the challenge is the one who lays his reasons to prevail in his debate.

Who said so much better?

You saying Milan has average defense is strike 1.

You layed the debate and now bring your points forward.

sorry did not realise we were in a courtroom.

Defense. Cole > Tawio. Terry > Nesta. Luiz = Silva. Bosingwa = Abate.

Not a courtroom.

Just proper discussion.

You have literally shot your self in the foot with a howitzer.

Seriously, I'll let Dosto respond as hopefully he will have the patience to completely destroy that piece of genius you just came up with.

Mate, how about you actually come back with a proper argument instead of insulting the other person's opinion every single time? Anything would do really...

I'd question your inequalities, however I really wouldn't care if you'd written that every Chelsea defender was better than our option in defence.

Football isn't about addition, even if what you had written were accurate it wouldn't matter. Chelsea have huge issues concerning creativity, even greater than that of Milan. What happens if Mata is missing currently? Ibrahimovic, Cassano, Robinho, Aquilani and Seedorf can all play an influential role for Milan once the team is fit and our runners are there to provide options and put more pressure on the opposition. Chelsea's midfield brings greater vitality, however the likes of Ramires, Mikel and Meireles aren't going to be opening holes in our defence with their passing and when our box-to-box midfielders are fit then the danger currently posed to our team by an opposition with strong movement will be heavily reduced.

You can argue that you could hold our attack and midfield, however we can equally hold yours.

No raping would occur unless someone happened to be having a ridiculously clinical day.