What trio is better? Try to remember how good R9-Zizou and Figo were at the new neo-galacticos' age.....

The new new-galactico age? R9 blew everyone but became a real monster after he turned 20
Zidane was very good but pretty unknown, still at 22 he wasn't a world beater
Figo was a late blumer as well, he started off really well at the age of 23 I think
Benzema doesn't stand a chance against any of them right now. Ozil would be superior to Figo but still somewhat lacking vs. Zidane. CR7 loses to R9 only. He does more damage on his own than Zidane or Figo at his age

Super_Floren wrote:What trio is better? Try to remember how good R9-Zizou and Figo were at the new neo-galacticos' age.....

I know where you're coming from:



Watch @ 3.10
The poetential is huge if they remain together for 1-2 more years

R9 was in a league of his own, Zidane came about a bit late although he was a main player at Juve, didn't see much of Figo till he joined Barca, Ronaldo I've followed his whole carreer. R9, CR7 then ZIdane.

Zidane joined Real Madrid at the age of 28 if i'm correct..

No doubt its zizou-r9-figo..

Please don't ever compare R9 to Benzema again.

aford92 wrote:Please don't ever compare R9 to Benzema again.

+100000000 if i could, delusional Benz fans, I swear.

Lionel Messi wrote:

aford92 wrote:Please don't ever compare R9 to Benzema again.

+100000000 if i could, delusional Benz fans, I swear.

+10000000000000000000000000000

lmao Figo wasn't a late bloomer at all.

Wow, how is it bad that we compare our favorite player to a legend?

Giggity5313 wrote:Wow, how is it bad that we compare our favorite player to a legend?

He can't hold a cradle against that legend even if he is Algerian R9 is arguably one of the best strikers ever, Benz struggles to keep his starting spot in Real Madrid

babun1024 wrote:

Giggity5313 wrote:Wow, how is it bad that we compare our favorite player to a legend?

He can't hold a cradle against that legend even if he is Algerian R9 is arguably one of the best strikers ever, Benz struggles to keep his starting spot in Real Madrid

He's still young though, he has time

wasnt ronaldo already the world's best striker/player at 20?

Ganso wrote:wasnt ronaldo already the world's best striker/player at 20?

Yes.

aford92 wrote:

Ganso wrote:wasnt ronaldo already the world's best striker/player at 20?

Yes.

But he was an early bloomer no? Where was xavi at 20?

no I was already at 18 years old, the best striker in the world. Coming in second behind Sammer in the ranking of the Golden Ball for 1 vote.

and at 17 made this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXsg5Xsg3C4

don't compare ozil to zidane either.

Lunatic Fringe wrote:don't compare ozil to zidane either.

totally right but Ozil's level right now is not too far from zidane's at the same age .

Benzema and R9 ? please

Zidane transferred to Juve in 96, at 24. This is Ozil's age.

IMO Zidane at 24 was better than ozil, but the bias is hardcore I admit

Figo was an early bloomer.

Ozil at 24 is more better than Zidane

wtf? stop bumping this