Lawyer Maurilio Prioreschi, you defend Luciano Moggi in the Calciopoli trials in Napoli: Why have you only recently found the telephone calls between Bergamo, Moratti, and Facchetti?
«It’s a question I’ve asked myself, together with another: Why were they not transcribed? Why were they hidden? It’s curious.».

How did you come about finding them?
«It Consist of 171,000 wiretaps. We checked Bergamo’s usage, the relative traffic arriving and outgoing, hence the discovery. But this isn’t really a discovery, but a confirmation. At the time, to call the referee designator was lawful, and everyone did it. I repeat: Everyone.».

The difference is in the contents however, don’t you think?
«I don’t exclude that that they are totally innocent, the recordings that were made of Moggi and Bergamo, respective to those that we believe we’ve found».

Even those of Moratti and Facchetti, then?
«Yes, also from other Inter directors».

Moratti has suggested that it wasn’t he who made the call, but the referee designators.
Moratti ha sostenuto che non era lui a chiamare, ma loro (i designatori).
«That changes little, I would say.».

One of the most “endearing” was Cagliari’s president, Cellino.
«Exactly».

Galliani?
«There are discussions between him and Pairetto, the other referee designator.».

Between Gallani and Bergamo?
«Didn’t appear. The references of the then League President (Gallani) were with Pairetto.».

Can one listen to the conversations?
«In principle, yes, and some we have already listened to. They are interesting….the contents will be divulged ind ue time. Perhaps at the next hearing on April 13th.».

Why “in principle?”
«Because some of them we have not been able to open.».

In summary?
«They [the referee designators] spoke on the phone with everyone, but for Moggi, the connection became a morbid fascination for others, it was a distraction or maybe a priveleged connection. I repeat: In the 2004-2005 season, you could have called Bergamo and Pairetto. It remains a mystery why the discussions between Bergamo, Moratti, and Facchetti were not taken into consideration by Auricchio.».

As to not have aroused suspension, perhaps.
«The clarity and completeness, in these cases, would have contributed a lot at the start to have removed slander and the “dark shadows.” Inter received a Scudetto from Juventus from this “diversity” of evidence.».

“Something will be missed,” rationalized the prosecuter Narducci.
«Only something?».

VibeTribe wrote:Banned?

All that crying on Milan board over Giancarlo ban(who sent insulting pm's to mods and made a double account),what should we do?We demand a 3 day thread to discuss Delaurentis ban like Milan board got

And LOL at mods deleting my "Inb4 a mod says innuendos are a bannable offence" post...Guess I nailed it.

InterMalia wrote:If anyone is able to make sciacca think logically, he can chose my avatar and i will forever use it!

dansik wrote:

VibeTribe wrote:Banned?

All that crying on Milan board over Giancarlo ban(who sent insulting pm's to mods and made a double account),what should we do?We demand a 3 day thread to discuss Delaurentis ban like Milan board got

And LOL at mods deleting my "Inb4 a mod says innuendos are a bannable offence" post...Guess I nailed it.

It was funny. We were told to PM mods if we see any fans in other sections making derogatory posts about Inter after delaurentis made the "Juve is a Serie B team" post. So I did just that. And then I got threatened that I don't want to test them because it isn't a good thing to do.

And the threads that insult Inter are NEVER locked, yet we get a thread locked for calling Juve a Serie B team. LOL. We really need an Inter supporter as a mod on these forums. It's hilarious that each of the other Serie A teams are represented by a moderator/admin, yet Inter gets nothing except shafted. Over and over.

sciacca wrote:

InterMalia wrote:If anyone is able to make sciacca think logically, he can chose my avatar and i will forever use it!

No Thanks, I just look at actually documents, in which has been released by all parties of the trials. Only 25 wiretapes were used for Juventus.

InterMalia wrote:

sciacca wrote:

InterMalia wrote:If anyone is able to make sciacca think logically, he can chose my avatar and i will forever use it!

No Thanks, I just look at actually documents, in which has been released by all parties of the trials. Only 25 wiretapes were used for Juventus.

For the love of god where is this magical documents only you can see? Is it in Lalaland?

sciacca wrote:

Lawyer Maurilio Prioreschi, you defend Luciano Moggi in the Calciopoli trials in Napoli: Why have you only recently found the telephone calls between Bergamo, Moratti, and Facchetti?
«It’s a question I’ve asked myself, together with another: Why were they not transcribed? Why were they hidden? It’s curious.».

How did you come about finding them?
«It Consist of 171,000 wiretaps. We checked Bergamo’s usage, the relative traffic arriving and outgoing, hence the discovery. But this isn’t really a discovery, but a confirmation. At the time, to call the referee designator was lawful, and everyone did it. I repeat: Everyone.».

The difference is in the contents however, don’t you think?
«I don’t exclude that that they are totally innocent, the recordings that were made of Moggi and Bergamo, respective to those that we believe we’ve found».

Even those of Moratti and Facchetti, then?
«Yes, also from other Inter directors».

Moratti has suggested that it wasn’t he who made the call, but the referee designators.
Moratti ha sostenuto che non era lui a chiamare, ma loro (i designatori).
«That changes little, I would say.».

One of the most “endearing” was Cagliari’s president, Cellino.
«Exactly».

Galliani?
«There are discussions between him and Pairetto, the other referee designator.».

Between Gallani and Bergamo?
«Didn’t appear. The references of the then League President (Gallani) were with Pairetto.».

Can one listen to the conversations?
«In principle, yes, and some we have already listened to. They are interesting….the contents will be divulged ind ue time. Perhaps at the next hearing on April 13th.».

Why “in principle?”
«Because some of them we have not been able to open.».

In summary?
«They [the referee designators] spoke on the phone with everyone, but for Moggi, the connection became a morbid fascination for others, it was a distraction or maybe a priveleged connection. I repeat: In the 2004-2005 season, you could have called Bergamo and Pairetto. It remains a mystery why the discussions between Bergamo, Moratti, and Facchetti were not taken into consideration by Auricchio.».

As to not have aroused suspension, perhaps.
«The clarity and completeness, in these cases, would have contributed a lot at the start to have removed slander and the “dark shadows.” Inter received a Scudetto from Juventus from this “diversity” of evidence.».

“Something will be missed,” rationalized the prosecuter Narducci.
«Only something?».

Owned?

sciacca wrote:

InterMalia wrote:If anyone is able to make sciacca think logically, he can chose my avatar and i will forever use it!

No Thanks, I just look at actually documents, in which has been released by all parties of the trials. Only 25 wiretapes were used for Juventus.

sciacca wrote:These were brought out from Moggi's lawyers in which they claimed was all Inter and what the FIGC and the courts in Naples documentations means it's true. I'm not claiming they can all be Inter's however, whatever the case may be, majoirty is theirs if allegations prove to be so. In any case, not all of them are obviously Facchetti's, however it involves other like Bergamo and etc... with Moratti contacting them of course. Even Telecom representatives, were arrested through these scandals. The proceedings don't lie. My saying it may sound retarted, but those statements come from the FIGC, not me.

CroInter wrote:I dont know Italian but ill trust you on it, they are saying there that there are 171k of wiretaps on Inter and 25 for Juve for Calciopoli?

sciacca wrote:Those 'TifosiBianconeri' videos are actually recordings from Sky Sports...

The TuttoJuve one was just showing another press release from what suppost to happen in courts. That was just an additional article.

As for the documents those were published in La Stampa and La Reppublia and others were shown in Sky Sports Segemtns. It's not my fault you don't have the channel.

InterMalia wrote:If anyone is able to make sciacca think logically, he can chose my avatar and i will forever use it!

InterMalia wrote:He made a comment on FIF about him getting banned from here. So yeah, he got banned.