Personally I think it should be allowed. It could speed up recovery time by 2 weeks I read

this is like asking if you would invite a rapist into your home to give your kids sex ed

Mr Nick09 wrote:this is like asking if you would invite a rapist into your home to give your kids sex ed

Don't think that's entirely true.

opening the doorway to doping is a slippery slope you dont want to take.

doping to quickly recover is the same as doping to improve performances. you are doing something unnatural to improve your performance

No.

Then players will start to dope all the time then, and when they test positive theyll just say "Oh l was recovering from an injury".

Well have dopers everywhere. Football will be the new early-mid 2000s MLB where just everyone cheats all the time

I think doping should be banned in general as otherwise the people who don't want to poison themselves would have no chance.

Everyone needs some clembuterol every now and then..

If its a long term injury I think its only fair to do it.. like at least 3 months long. Otherwise its an invitation for players to fake injuries n get boosts

I'm pretty sure any proof of you using any doping will only last 3 days or so (depending on person ofc), so if you have had a injury you have a valid reason for using it. If you're using it 3 days before a matchday, maybe not so much.

Although I agree with rwo, it will force a lot of players who don't want to use any toxic substances to do so.. But at the same time I don't see how it's no different than using morphine/drugs/any painkiller. Medication for injurys are common, but I do see your point

It will only escalate