I personally enjoy BL and Serie A the most football wise..... not to say they are the best just what i enjoy.

I haven't watched La Liga properly in about 6 months though so i can't really comment.

PL i mainly watch for Newcastle and that is pure torture, other games i don't really follow other than MOTD etc etc.

Real Madrid and Barcelona have more resources available to them to succeed than the other La Liga teams. In fact they probably have more than any of the other top teams in the World.

Valencia, Malaga, Atletico etc can hope they get a rich owner (Malaga kinda did) or just try and do something similar to what Dortmund did. However even then Real Madrid/Barca will probably be better.

I mean in the EPL there's been 2 clubs who have occupied the top two position for 9 years and recently Man City have joined them. So there's not really much of a difference.

Lol how the Malaga match is already mystified and the facts forgotten, as if it were some obscure part of pre-history.

djfawnz wrote:how can you say la liga is better than epl or bundes or serie a? they only have 2 good teams! all the other ones are in a financial depression bigger than other leagues IMO, but hey dont gangbang me for my comment....

You clearly do not watch la liga...

VivaStPauli wrote:Lol how the Malaga match is already mystified and the facts forgotten, as if it were some obscure part of pre-history.

Not really, Malaga did great considering it was their first CL ever, and while Dortmund were superior on both legs Malaga were still an offside goal away from semis.

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Not really, Malaga did great considering it was their first CL ever, and while Dortmund were superior on both legs Malaga were still an offside goal away from semis.

Not quite if you consider that Malaga had an offside goal of their own, too.

Also, despite the actual number of goals scored, one of those teams created infinitely more chances.

Dortmund had two offsides in the same goal

I didn't watch the first game but didn't people say the game was even???

halamadrid2 wrote:Dortmund had two offsides in the same goal

I didn't watch the first game but didn't people say the game was even???

The 2nd was a lot more even than the first.

The first should have been wrapped up by Dortmund, easily criminal the amount of chances they missed.

rwo power wrote:

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Not really, Malaga did great considering it was their first CL ever, and while Dortmund were superior on both legs Malaga were still an offside goal away from semis.

Not quite if you consider that Malaga had an offside goal of their own, too.

Yes and I'm not calling it unfair that Dortmund went though, but Dortmund's offside was crystal clear whereas Malaga's wasn't. Again, I'm not saying Malaga should've gone through, only that they were very close to it.

Also, if they lack the finishing to score more, isn't that a reflection of Dortmund's lack of clinical ability?

Please, 9/10 times Dortmund would destroy Malaga. That wasn't their night, but football sometimes is with the better ones.