Chumlum wrote:Sina your formation got me thinking about something slightly different: Rosicky and Cazorla flanking/interchanging with Jack in a 4-2-3-1 could actually be an interesting experiment ...

Less "attack-minded" on paper than when the flanks are Podolski/Walcott, i.e. forwards, and we haven't put out formations like that I think since the days of Hleb and a younger Rosicky. But as we've seen recently Rosicky (like Cazorla) still has his ability to push forward and maneuver past his man and to create. I for one would be intrigued.

Eman wrote:With Arteta and Ramsey behind them, our possession game would surely benefit

Then again, sacrificing width against teams that park the bus would likely hurt us in the long-run.

GoonerJay29 wrote:Stretching the play isn't really about attacking down the flanks, though. It's more about players moving into wide areas to either find space because the centre is too congested or to attract defenders towards them, thus opening up space down the sides.

GoonerJay29 wrote:
So you can see where the problems would lie. What's pivotal for Arsenal now, with our current lopsided formation, is for whoever is playing on the right hand side to realise that they need to start out closer to the touchline then make runs inside when the space in there. The sooner Walcott remembers this, the better.

Sina wrote:

urbaNRoots wrote:Arsenal striker Olivier Giroud has had his appeal for wrongful dismissal rejected, the Football Association confirms.

C'MON POLDI SAVE US PLS

GoonerJay29 wrote:Cazorla's best form us has been in the centre, though it's kind of a moot point since that's where he ends up even if does play LAM.

I'd debate that there is something wrong with the set-up, in that with the players play within it, we become too narrow. Cazorla coming inside is fine, but the LB needs to become a LW which Monreal doesn't do and the RW needs to stay out wide to stretch the play, which Walcott doesn't do anymore; he's beginning to play closer and closer to Giroud.

This is where Podolski is useful because although he also doesn't stick to the left hand side, he doesn't drift into central areas or even to the right hand side.

urbaNRoots wrote:Arsenal striker Olivier Giroud has had his appeal for wrongful dismissal rejected, the Football Association confirms.

C'MON POLDI SAVE US PLS

CBarca wrote:I don't see how it was any different from Sidwell's red card (which was justified).

I guess you could say Sidwell's was a bit worse and tbf it was, but both are red cards. Both are going high with studs up, clearly very recklessly and those types of challenges are the ones that get players injured. I'm sure you were shouting red after Sidwell's challenge and Fulham fans were shouting red after Girouds, and in this case both sets of fans are right.

CBarca wrote:I don't see how it was any different from Sidwell's red card (which was justified).

I guess you could say Sidwell's was a bit worse and tbf it was, but both are red cards. Both are going high with studs up, clearly very recklessly and those types of challenges are the ones that get players injured. I'm sure you were shouting red after Sidwell's challenge and Fulham fans were shouting red after Girouds, and in this case both sets of fans are right.

Morning all,

it seems somewhat quieter this morning. Hopefully there are a few Manchester hangovers, some of which include acute food poisoning and 72 hour ebola as they ready themselves for the trip to play us on Sunday.

The Arsenal news yesterday was not particularly good as Olivier Giroud’s red card appeal was rejected. The FA’s disciplinary committee who rescinded an over the top because he slipped red card by Vincent Kompany on Jack Wilshere – decided not to do likewise for the Frenchman, but it’s no surprise really.

The issue now is that we have to find a solution ahead of a game from which we definitely need something this weekend. There are three obvious candidates, it’s probably worth looking at their pros and cons. Starting with:

Lukas Podolski
Pros: Plenty of experience as a striker for Cologne; left foot like Thor’s hammer; takes a good free kick; some of his finishes this season have been outstanding

Cons: Has been nursing an ankle injury since September, meaning he’s sluggish and lacks pace; has barely been picked there all season, suggesting Wenger isn’t convinced; may require a London cab to get him through 90 minutes

Theo Walcott
Pros: Still the top scorer; has lots of pace; is quick; is very fast; can run at high speed; velocity goes to 11; is capable of sprinting with great alacrity; once beat Speedy Gonzalez in a race; after a few weeks out should have plenty of energy

Cons: Unsuited to playing as a central striker in this system; hold up play non-existent; will be out-muscled by United centre-halves; form is in the toilet since new contract

Gervinho
Pros: Live-wire, full of energy and running; is also fast; had a decent spell there early in the season scoring 5 goals in his first 7 games; has found some form recently; unpredictability makes it hard for defenders to know what he’s going to do

Cons: Is Gervinho; unpredictability makes it hard for teammates to know what he’s going to do; unpredictability makes it hard for himself to know what he’s going to do; finishing can often leave something to be desired; often makes it look like he’s kicking a 20 pound medicine ball rather than a football

—

So, I think what that tells us is that there’s no obvious solution at this moment in time. Were he fully fit then it’d have to be Podolski, but unless we can get him juiced up like a hepcat on boogie-woogie pills it’s difficult to see how he’d manage. I remain entirely unconvinced by Walcott in a central role, regardless of how often he tries to hint he wants to play there by drifting in from the right and leaving Sagna scratching his head about who to pass to. Therefore, by default, it could be that Gervinho is the best option.

Which leads me to the conclusion that those ‘fans’ who celebrated Giroud’s red card and suspension after the game on Saturday are even more stupid than I thought. And that’s quite the feat because I thought they were pretty stupid to begin with. There’s nobody saying he’s the perfect centre-forward, I doubt there are too many people completely blind to the flaws he has in his game, but roistering over the absence of our only real central-striking option is mindless at this point of the season.

Yes, it points to a lack of depth in the squad, but that’s hardly news – it’s been a topic of discussion for the entire season. I’ve feared a time when the paucity of options would come back to bite us in the arse, and unless one of the three above steps up, then we could find the final four games of this campaign tough going.

That said, another point worth bearing in mind is that although we certainly lack forward choices, the goals don’t have to come from forwards. We’ve got talented midfield players who, Cazorla aside, have a very poor return in front of goal this season. Arteta’s have all come from penalties (I think there might have been one scrappy 2 foot header), Aaron Ramsey has 1, Jack Wilshere has 2 and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain 2, but only the latter has scored in the Premier League (during the 7-3 win over Newcastle).

Tomas Rosicky got 2 the other week against West Brom, but that’s not as healthy as it could be. In the absence of Giroud, and when the forwards are going through a period of difficult form, you look to other areas of your team to help and there’s no doubt the midfield could contribute more in that regard. Anyway, as the week goes on and we hear more from the boss we’ll be able to get a better idea of what he’s planning on doing.

On the flip side, for all his suitability to the role, it’s not as if Giroud is a goal machine who has been banging them in left, right and centre in recent weeks. He’s scored 3 in his last 12 appearances, so while he’s the man who fits the central striking position best from the squad we have, it’s not as if we’re trying to replace our only goalscorer.

Perhaps it might refocus others, force them to step and take responsibility. Somebody’s got to. The points are too valuable for that not happen. I guess we’ll find out who, if anyone, is ready for that.

Till tomorrow.