http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,12040_7013043,0.html

He is an interesting target, a tad expensive but a great talent.

QPR don't need the money and he is QPR's best player. 13.5 mil not enough to convince them lol.

They said they were trying to sign new "Messi's" I read earlier today

EarlyPrototype wrote:QPR don't need the money and he is QPR's best player. 13.5 mil not enough to convince them lol.

Thats not true.No one actually knows whether their owners will invest into the club or spend within their means.They didnt spend much in the championship,havent spent much so far so just because they have Laxmi Mittal doesnt mean they are a rich club.There are also constant rumors the owners are looking to sell the club ever since they qualified for PL.So wont be surprised if Mittal and the other owner dont spend much and sell for a profit now that they are in PL as the club is more marketable now.They certainly wont spent like city or chelsea these guys are businessmen looking for a profit.

They meant that they are trying to sign young promising players, because they want to develop stars as well, just a figure of speech.

taarabt is not the new messi lol

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:They meant that they are trying to sign young promising players, because they want to develop stars as well, just a figure of speech.

taarabt is not the new messi lol

That's what the article said
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/931573/psg-target-%27new-messi%27-and-five-year-title-plan?cc=5901

He had a good season but its in championship.He is a horrible c*nt to add to that.

He already failed in PL with Spurs and his attitude was the main reason for that.Nothing has changed since then.Surely for 14mil they can find a better player?

BeautifulGame wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:QPR don't need the money and he is QPR's best player. 13.5 mil not enough to convince them lol.

Thats not true.No one actually knows whether their owners will invest into the club or spend within their means.They didnt spend much in the championship,havent spent much so far so just because they have Laxmi Mittal doesnt mean they are a rich club.There are also constant rumors the owners are looking to sell the club ever since they qualified for PL.So wont be surprised if Mittal and the other owner dont spend much and sell for a profit now that they are in PL as the club is more marketable now.They certainly wont spent like city or chelsea these guys are businessmen looking for a profit.

Just because they didn't spend in the championship doesn't mean they wont spend in the EPL and if your saying they wont invest in the club there is a possibility they wont spend the money they receive from Adel. If the current owners leave then that is a different story.

EarlyPrototype wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:QPR don't need the money and he is QPR's best player. 13.5 mil not enough to convince them lol.

Thats not true.No one actually knows whether their owners will invest into the club or spend within their means.They didnt spend much in the championship,havent spent much so far so just because they have Laxmi Mittal doesnt mean they are a rich club.There are also constant rumors the owners are looking to sell the club ever since they qualified for PL.So wont be surprised if Mittal and the other owner dont spend much and sell for a profit now that they are in PL as the club is more marketable now.They certainly wont spent like city or chelsea these guys are businessmen looking for a profit.

Just because they didn't spend in the championship doesn't mean they wont spend in the EPL and if your saying they wont invest in the club there is a possibility they wont spend the money they receive from Adel. If the current owners leave then that is a different story.

The point i am making is just because they have rich owners everyone is assuming they dont need money and will spend big in the market.But they havent given any indication that is true and the only noises coming out of the club are they wont spend much.So its too soon to come to a conclusion they dont need money and spend big in the market.

What I am trying to say is that 13.5 mil is not going to trigger the owners into spending. They have much more money than that and selling Adel is not going to mean that the owners will use those funds to spend.

I love how many people keep mentioning Taarabt "failed" with Spurs even though he was only like 18/19 at the time and barely got any playing time.

Muppets.

Gil wrote:I love how many people keep mentioning Taarabt "failed" with Spurs even though he was only like 18/19 at the time and barely got any playing time.

Yeh I think people are really under estimating him.

Gil wrote:I love how many people keep mentioning Taarabt "failed" with Spurs even though he was only like 18/19 at the time and barely got any playing time.

Muppets.

Taarbabt failed at spurs not because he was young or because of his talent but because of his attitude.Considering that attitude hasn't changed so far by the way he behaved at QPR and the interview he has given recently it isnt going to change anything regardless how old he is now.

Muppet.

BeautifulGame wrote:
Taarbabt failed at spurs not because he was young or because of his talent but because of his attitude.Considering that attitude hasn't changed so far by the way he behaved at QPR and the interview he has given recently it isnt going to change anything regardless how old he is now.

Muppet.

so you are saying that he is indeed talented, but PSG shouldnt buy him because of his attitude?

nj wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:
Taarbabt failed at spurs not because he was young or because of his talent but because of his attitude.Considering that attitude hasn't changed so far by the way he behaved at QPR and the interview he has given recently it isnt going to change anything regardless how old he is now.

Muppet.

so you are saying that he is indeed talented, but PSG shouldnt buy him because of his attitude?

Nah i am saying there are better players for 14mil than Taarbat out there and he isnt worth 14mil.He maybe talented but he is only proven in the championship and also has p**s poor attitude.So is it worth the gamble? I dont think so.

Name a player more talented than Taarabt that PSG can get for under £14m.

^^^^^^^^^^Menez

Gil wrote:Name a player more talented than Taarabt that PSG can get for under £14m.

Niko Kranjcar

BeautifulGame wrote:
Niko Kranjcar

lol you're not being serious mate.

the Qataris said:
"we want to invest in the big stars of tomorrow from all over the world, including France."
and really i dont think Kranjcar fits that description.

I heard PSG were bidding crazy money for Hazard. What happened to that?

Gil wrote:Name a player more talented than Taarabt that PSG can get for under £14m.

Taraabt is wayyyyyyy overpriced at 14 million pound.

Gil wrote:Name a player more talented than Taarabt that PSG can get for under £14m.

Konchesky.
Poulsen.
Cole.
El Zhar.
Degen.
Jova.

Oh, wait..........

Talented?

milanista99 wrote:I heard PSG were bidding crazy money for Hazard. What happened to that?

I doubt Lille sells to a League 1 rival unless it's really crazy money.

milanista99 wrote:I heard PSG were bidding crazy money for Hazard. What happened to that?

im sure they want him, but i dont think Hazard would be interested, (nor Lille)

i mean, he can already be a starter for many big european clubs, but moving to Paris would be a step down at this moment (PSG project will take a few seasons to grow, plus they arn't in CL this season unlike Lille).

unless its purely for money, i dont think hell go there. (plus in the past days Lille president has reiterated that he wont be sold this summer)

The Fonz wrote:^^^^^^^^^^Menez

good shout.
they were rumours that they were interessted in him in the past weeks, i wonder if they are still in for him