Are pathetic.

RVP is our only striker. The wingers are useless.

Gervinho sucks. Theres no way around it. He is just not good enough for a top 4 EPL team.

Arshavin is having a laugh.

Theo is good.... but nothing more then that. He wouldn't start for united, chelsea, city, pool, or spurs.
Theo would be a very effective sub.

I really can't get over how disappointing of a signing Gervinho is.

i thought Gervinho worked his butt off today. he couldve been a little more efficient but the guy was EVERYWHERE. both wings, through the middle, at least he gave a hard effort.



arshavin is pathetic, and theo just got marked out of the match by zabaleta.

theo made zero off the ball runs

I love him... but am losing faith quickly

Gervingo was by far you best best striker,he simply cant finish and he cant pass on the final third.

lol wtf Gervinho sucks?

He's still adapting, but I thought he was great today. Came back 40-50 yards to help out the defence, had a go at a pretty solid Richards, and made some nice cuts inside.

"simply adapting"

Fk'n tired of the excuse. Why are we wasting a season with players adapting.

Gervinho was great today.. Gave everything.. Arshavins time is over.. Walcot was crap today..
And flop of match Ramsey.. As usual.. He fails consistently against good teams.. Why he always goes for backheels and try some weird skills and end up giving the ball.. Just be simple and play your game..

Artemis wrote:"simply adapting"

Fk'n tired of the excuse. Why are we wasting a season with players adapting.

Because we dont have any choice? every new player needs to adapt and he wasnt that bad. He just need to work more on his final ball.

Wow you were not watching the game, Gervhinho worked his ass off. Theo was useless did not do anything.

The prophecy must be fulfilled.


PODOLSKI TO ARSENAL.

lenear1030 wrote:The prophecy must be fulfilled.


PODOLSKI TO ARSENAL.

Gervinho was our best striker if not our best player in the pitch, and Walcott was busy doing Djourou's job, who was completely lost most of the time, but we don't have depth we need two signings in attack, a winger and a striker.

Gervinho was great. Walcott was very isolated. Van Persie is van Persie.

Remember we had CBs for fullbacks and that of course our wingers aren't going to look as good with guys playing out of position.

Gervinho was good today. Walcott should have done better given the circumstance that he was against Zabaleta but he wasnt able to deliver. You cant expect that all our forward should score and assist every game so calm down.

This thread is the definition of a knee-jerk

RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:honestly gervinho was decent, i believe he can improve, walcott is a sub player and good to have on the bench and come on. we need podoski to replace him in the starting and we are set in jan, we need willy and sagna to come back desperately as well .

I know Godolski is the GOAT, but seriously Theo will still start if we buy him. Theo faded today near the end, but earlier in the game it annoyed me how little we passed to him considering he was frequently in great positions and his final ball is far better than Gervinho's (although Gervinho worked very hard today).

Gervinho = complete workhorse. if you watched the match and disagree jog on.

dont agree at all

Gervinho had a good game today.

Stop being fickle

Gervinho sucks? What, like Pires, Nasri and Song in first season?

Today, he played well. His final ball is lacking at times, but his movement and threat is great.

We paid £10.6m for him and he has been worth it.

Wow. The amount of kneejerks and Jerks in this forum really pisses me beyond words sometime. [Note: This is a general remark, not limited to this thread]

srigooner wrote:Wow. The amount of kneejerks and Jerks in this forum really pisses me beyond words sometime. [Note: This is a general remark, not limited to this thread]

Yeah, it's a progress guys not a match of death, take positives from the game also. I learn to eat my words long times ago regarding Theo, won't make any assessment or call out against Gervinho who had good game imo. As much as i hate Man City, they have 100% record at home so they are strong, we battled til the very end. The reason our wingers looked bad in your eyes is because we have 2 CB as fullbacks, so those overlap runs were not there.

srigooner wrote:Wow. The amount of kneejerks and Jerks in this forum really pisses me beyond words sometime. [Note: This is a general remark, not limited to this thread]

Honestly, it was one damn match that we played pretty well in lol. We gave City a run for their money [pun intended] and did that on their turf. We're still improving.

Walcott would probably start as often as not for Liverpool actually. Bellamy is the only player in our squad with real pace and with his knees he can't start every match. Plus, we have no actual right wingers or right forwards.

Gervinho was great against City. He was our best attacker. He roasted Richards and squared it to VP who put a weak shot right at Hart. If RVP hit that one like we expect him to, it's a goal.

I love Gervinho and he looks like he will be very good for us. I don't think he's our problem.