Milito: 80 minutes.... did nothing


Forlan: 15 minutes....... set up at least 3 chances, looked lively, orchestrated a wonderful counter attack. nd actually had a shot or two on net.


All i remember from Milito was that fake shot then he shot on short side on Frey, not a very likely chance of scoring.



So basically, i think everyone agrees that Milito has no place in the Starting XI

honestly at this point it's more respectful to not play a legend like this. it's better to be remembered as a hero than one big blooper highlight reel.

We should loan him to tottenham in January, maybe he could find his rhythm again in a new league.

it was roumered that PSG want him, but now with tevez more likely moving there i guess we'll be seeing much more of him

I think forlan will surpass milito in the starting 11

i donno, Renieri is a super nice guy and he'd try to play him as much as possible. As i remember he still played Marchioni after Nedved came back from an injury in a knockout CL game coz "he was a part of the CL run"

milito wont find his form back even in the lebanese league, his days are over, when you see him missing this chance u feel disgusted. forlan really was impressing, he plays like a real champion, this is the player we really need right now.

RobbyV wrote:Milito: 80 minutes.... did nothing


Forlan: 15 minutes....... set up at least 3 chances, looked lively, orchestrated a wonderful counter attack. nd actually had a shot or two on net.


All i remember from Milito was that fake shot then he shot on short side on Frey, not a very likely chance of scoring.



So basically, i think everyone agrees that Milito has no place in the Starting XI

milito is shyt. but to be fair, Genoa pushed completely forward when Forlan was on. He had more space to work with and less defenders to go against.

Also, Pazzini has proven to not be Inter quality. He has been almost as bad as Milito.

We would score more goals with Eto up front as the lone striker playing 10 vs 11 then we do 11 v 11 with these 2 guys. Im serious too.

etoo is worth all our attack

steve_smith wrote:

RobbyV wrote:Milito: 80 minutes.... did nothing


Forlan: 15 minutes....... set up at least 3 chances, looked lively, orchestrated a wonderful counter attack. nd actually had a shot or two on net.


All i remember from Milito was that fake shot then he shot on short side on Frey, not a very likely chance of scoring.



So basically, i think everyone agrees that Milito has no place in the Starting XI

milito is shyt. but to be fair, Genoa pushed completely forward when Forlan was on. He had more space to work with and less defenders to go against.

Also, Pazzini has proven to not be Inter quality. He has been almost as bad as Milito.

We would score more goals with Eto up front as the lone striker playing 10 vs 11 then we do 11 v 11 with these 2 guys. Im serious too.

Don't judge Pazzini so soon.

With the right players in the lineup he can flourish.

He is not a world beater like Eto'o or a physical beast like Ibra.

He is highly effective and highly clinical and is the man to spearhead our attack.

RobbyV wrote:

steve_smith wrote:

RobbyV wrote:Milito: 80 minutes.... did nothing


Forlan: 15 minutes....... set up at least 3 chances, looked lively, orchestrated a wonderful counter attack. nd actually had a shot or two on net.


All i remember from Milito was that fake shot then he shot on short side on Frey, not a very likely chance of scoring.



So basically, i think everyone agrees that Milito has no place in the Starting XI

milito is shyt. but to be fair, Genoa pushed completely forward when Forlan was on. He had more space to work with and less defenders to go against.

Also, Pazzini has proven to not be Inter quality. He has been almost as bad as Milito.

We would score more goals with Eto up front as the lone striker playing 10 vs 11 then we do 11 v 11 with these 2 guys. Im serious too.

Don't judge Pazzini so soon.

With the right players in the lineup he can flourish.

He is not a world beater like Eto'o or a physical beast like Ibra.

He is highly effective and highly clinical and is the man to spearhead our attack.

*lol* how biased is that ???
don't judge Pazzini so soon, with the right players in the lineup he can flourish, so why should we judge Milito ???seriously I think that Pazzini is definitely not good enough for Inter, we should really try for Tevez !!

Tevez is a mentally unstable child...I dont want him anywhere near this team

Batigoal: because milito has been utter crap ever since the treble season, pazzini has not been crap that whole time, he's also younger than milito

andiii wrote:Batigoal: because milito has been utter crap ever since the treble season, pazzini has not been crap that whole time, he's also younger than milito

For sure Milito wasn't good this season, but we shouldn't forget, that he had a lot of injuries the last year and this year is just that he is a striker an he need to know that his coach trust him, what Raineri is not really doing!
I was always puzzled by the purchase of Pazzini, as I don't see him as a wc striker at all.
and btw Milito got 4 in 16 games (1106 min ) and Pazzini got also 4 goals in 18 games(1245) !!!

i think both players are underachieving, but milito has been missing a lot of easy chances, and this is costing us. maybe he moves a little bit more than pazzini, but his finishing is becoming very poor. pazzini can be good if the team is attacking, and if the midfield is pushing up, but in case of counter attacks (which is 80% of inter's tactics) you cant notice his presence. so regarding milito's age, i think we should find a replacement for him, and pazzo can be at least a nice choice in case of attack