Reports in Italy and France suggest Samir Nasri of Arsenal is the big transfer coup on Inter’s summer agenda.

The Gunners starlet’s contract expires in June 2012 and he has not been eager to renew, so a sale seems likely.


According to Sky Sport Italia, President Massimo Moratti has set his sights on taking Nasri to Serie A.


It certainly wouldn’t be the first time, as he has been interested in the French international since his days at Marseille in 2008, when Arsenal purchased him for £15.8m.



http://football-italia.net/jun11f.html

I d take him over Pastore/Sanchez. So, yes.

Arsenal too would prefer to sell to Inter than United . But how would Inter play Nasri ?

Will they lineup like this with Nasri on the left of a front 3 perhaps

Nasri-----Pazzini------E'to

Sneijder

if they get nasri ,they'll surely be selling sniejder..i hav heard rumours of a sneijder-nani swap..

Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

Nasri cannot replace Sneijder, he's not that good as a playmaker.

BeautifulGame wrote:Arsenal too would prefer to sell to Inter than United . But how would Inter play Nasri ?

Will they lineup like this with Nasri on the left of a front 3 perhaps

Nasri-----Pazzini------E'to

Sneijder

In theory that is a very sexy attacking line-up indeed. Would love to see that!

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Nani > Young imo

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

Well they were dumb enough not to start him in the most important match of the season

Narsi is most likely just holding out for a better contract.

Would be very surprised if Wenger let him leave.

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

drakefyre wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

Well they were dumb enough not to start him in the most important match of the season

That was because Ferguson prefers Park in big matches since always offers them work rate . Nani carried United single handedly in the first half of the season .

No way that Nasri is going to Inter

juvefanmkd wrote:No way that Nasri is going to Inter

Why ?

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

nani still has to accept fergie's rotation policy..getting young would only push his exit..

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

nani still has to accept fergie's rotation policy..getting young would only push his exit..

Its the other way round . Young wil have to accept the rotation because Nani is the better players . Either way Nani has repeatedly said that he is staying at United so not sure where u are getting the info from .

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

nani still has to accept fergie's rotation policy..getting young would only push his exit..

Its the other way round . Young wil have to accept the rotation because Nani is the better players . Either way Nani has repeatedly said that he is staying at United so not sure where u are getting the info from .

why the hell would fergie splash the cash on young and then think of implementing his rotation policy !?i am not comparing nani and young but i dont quite see either of them rotting on the bench when united already hav backups in park and giggs..like i said ,its just rumours and we'll see !!

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

nani still has to accept fergie's rotation policy..getting young would only push his exit..

Its the other way round . Young wil have to accept the rotation because Nani is the better players . Either way Nani has repeatedly said that he is staying at United so not sure where u are getting the info from .

why the hell would fergie splash the cash on young and then think of implementing his rotation policy !?i am not comparing nani and young but i dont quite see either of them rotting on the bench when united already hav backups in park and giggs..like i said ,its just rumours and we'll see !!

Because they need squad depth since Giggs is retiring soon . None of them will rote on the bench . All will play around 35-40 games . As i said fergie is the master of rotation . Young will be what Carrick what is in for Midfield . Good squad player . As for splashing cash they had Anderson (18 mil ) , Carrick ( 18 mil ) yet trying to buy another midfielder ( Nasri / Modric ) . They have just splashed cash on Jones ( 16 mil ) who will be their 4 th choice CB .

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why would United take Sniejder and give away a winger. Sneijder ca not fill in for Nani at United and vice versa.

but they're going to get young who's gonna occupy that left wing..its just rumours ATM ..nothing more

United are signing Young as a replacement for Giggs . Nothing to do with Nani . United arent dumb to sell their best player of last season .

valencia will undoubtedly occupy the right wing ,young the left wing which leaves nani on the bench !!!and with euros approaching he would want to play more..u call nani as their best player and u also say that young is replacement for giggs..how can u fit 3 wingers in one lineup mate ????

Rotation . Ferguson is the master of rotation . He has Vidic and Ferdinand yet has bought Smalling and Jones why do u think that ? Also they have 4 wingers not 3 u missed Park who Ferguson prefers to play in big matches .

nani still has to accept fergie's rotation policy..getting young would only push his exit..

Its the other way round . Young wil have to accept the rotation because Nani is the better players . Either way Nani has repeatedly said that he is staying at United so not sure where u are getting the info from .

why the hell would fergie splash the cash on young and then think of implementing his rotation policy !?i am not comparing nani and young but i dont quite see either of them rotting on the bench when united already hav backups in park and giggs..like i said ,its just rumours and we'll see !!

Because they need squad depth since Giggs is retiring soon . None of them will roteate on the bench . All will play around 35-40 games . As i said fergie is the master of rotation . Young will be what Carrick what is in for Midfield . Good squad player . As for splashing cash they had Anderson (18 mil ) , Carrick ( 18 mil ) yet trying to buy another midfielder ( Nasri / Modric ) . They have just splashed cash on Jones ( 16 mil ) who will be their 4 th choice CB .

if young thought that if he would come to united to be a squad player ,he wouldnt hav ever chosen united..and united are paying around 130 000 pounds a week for ur self-proclaimed squad player..and anderson and carrick are inconsistent players..they've not really taken over frm scholes..thats why united will sign perhaps a new MF..

Enough with the Arsenal players 1st Cesc now Nasri & Clichy !!!

Who's next RVP !!!

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

if young thought that if he would come to united to be a squad player ,he wouldnt hav ever chosen united..and united are paying around 130 000 pounds a week for ur self-proclaimed squad player..and anderson and carrick are inconsistent players..they've not really taken over frm scholes..thats why united will sign perhaps a new MF..

Young wont simply be a squad player . All 4 wingers they have will play similar amount of games . As i said earlier Fergie is pretty good at that .

Yes United are signing a new MF player to replace Scholes but the point is they have big money players as squad players which is similar to Young .

BeautifulGame wrote:

Surag.Blueguy wrote:

if young thought that if he would come to united to be a squad player ,he wouldnt hav ever chosen united..and united are paying around 130 000 pounds a week for ur self-proclaimed squad player..and anderson and carrick are inconsistent players..they've not really taken over frm scholes..thats why united will sign perhaps a new MF..

Young wont simply be a squad player . All 4 wingers they have will play similar amount of games . As i said earlier Fergie is pretty good at that .

Yes United are signing a new MF player to replace Scholes but the point is they have big money players as squad players which is similar to Young .

united have big money players as squad players like anderson,carrick which u mentioned coz they've shown poor form..they havent really cemented their place in the starting eleven..perhaps its the will of the players to stay at united as well..but thr have many rumours on nani lately ,and its just a hypothesis u know !!