This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skin • Return to the skin page
Rival Watch
+44
Rev
futbol
huntsman
Amar
Hapless_Hans
Arsenalfaithfull
Kick
FRANTIC
VendettaRed07
Glory
silver
Abramovich
Helmer
MaraVilla
SamuelJayC
Peccadillo
REWB
DeletedUser#1
Gil
TalkingReckless
Wilson37
boyzis
AnJl
iftikhar
Art Morte
Twoism
Busby Babe
Great Leader Sprucenuce
urbaNRoots
Sri
Nishankly
MJ
Lex
McAgger
CBarca
furiouswindbottom
El Gunner
Jay29
RealGunner
RedOranje
Sina
6unner
Chumlum
Raptorgunner
48 posters
Page 6 of 30
Page 6 of 30 • 1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 18 ... 30
Re: Rival Watch
http://www.thescore.com/epl/news/544628
City uses 'Ask Jesus' hashtag for Twitter chat with Jesus Navas, religious jokes predictably ensue
City uses 'Ask Jesus' hashtag for Twitter chat with Jesus Navas, religious jokes predictably ensue
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
i am sure its not pronounced "Jesus" anyway its "Hesus"
REWB- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5436
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Rival Watch
Spanish speaking nations call Jesus Christ, Hesus Cristo. So same thing REWB.
McAgger- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 28318
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 107
Re: Rival Watch
thought this was pretty good:srigooner wrote:http://www.thescore.com/epl/news/544628
City uses 'Ask Jesus' hashtag for Twitter chat with Jesus Navas, religious jokes predictably ensue
Did you become a winger because of your previous experience with crosses? #AskJesus
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Club Supported :
Posts : 23080
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 27
Re: Rival Watch
They did #AskWilly not too long ago which was a big mess too
TalkingReckless- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4200
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 32
Re: Rival Watch
Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard caused something of a stir this week when he claimed that he told Luis Suarez that he was too good for Arsenal.
For those who missed it, the Liverpool captain said: ‘I would have been really sad and disappointed to see Luis go to Arsenal. With all due respect to them, I said to him that he was too good for Arsenal.’
Here are five reasons why he was wrong:
1. Suarez himself realised that Arsenal could offer him more than Liverpool, hence why he asked to be allowed to leave. It was only Liverpool’s refusal to honour his buy-out clause, as John W. Henry admitted, that stopped the deal going through.
2. Arsenal have finished above Liverpool in the Premier League 16 times since 1992 compared to just the five times when the Reds have finished above the Gunners.
3. During his time with Liverpool, whom Gerrard never thought Suarez was too good to play for, the Uruguayan did not play in the Champions League and won only the League Cup. Had he been at Arsenal during that time he would have played in the Champions League every year and won the FA Cup [and who knows what else he would have helped the side win]
4. After a period of austerity due to the stadium build, Arsenal have now come out the other side of that and are starting to buy big-name players like Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez while Liverpool are losing theirs and have still not started their stadium refurbishment [after having to downgrade from building a new stadium altogether as they realise it isn’t as good as it seems]. Arsenal are on the way back up, can Liverpool say the same?
5. Despite suffering almost half the amount of injuries that Arsenal suffered last season, Liverpool could only manage to finish five points ahead of the London club with Suarez in their side [Liverpool do like the number five]. With Suarez playing for Arsenal, the Gunners would surely have finished above them and could even have won the league.
The simple fact is if Suarez wasn’t too good to play for Liverpool then there is no way he was too good to play for Arsenal.
Sorry Stevie, looks like you’ve slipped up again there.
http://metro.co.uk/2014/08/01/five-reasons-steven-gerrard-was-wrong-about-luis-suarez-being-too-good-for-arsenal-4817603/
For those who missed it, the Liverpool captain said: ‘I would have been really sad and disappointed to see Luis go to Arsenal. With all due respect to them, I said to him that he was too good for Arsenal.’
Here are five reasons why he was wrong:
1. Suarez himself realised that Arsenal could offer him more than Liverpool, hence why he asked to be allowed to leave. It was only Liverpool’s refusal to honour his buy-out clause, as John W. Henry admitted, that stopped the deal going through.
2. Arsenal have finished above Liverpool in the Premier League 16 times since 1992 compared to just the five times when the Reds have finished above the Gunners.
3. During his time with Liverpool, whom Gerrard never thought Suarez was too good to play for, the Uruguayan did not play in the Champions League and won only the League Cup. Had he been at Arsenal during that time he would have played in the Champions League every year and won the FA Cup [and who knows what else he would have helped the side win]
4. After a period of austerity due to the stadium build, Arsenal have now come out the other side of that and are starting to buy big-name players like Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez while Liverpool are losing theirs and have still not started their stadium refurbishment [after having to downgrade from building a new stadium altogether as they realise it isn’t as good as it seems]. Arsenal are on the way back up, can Liverpool say the same?
5. Despite suffering almost half the amount of injuries that Arsenal suffered last season, Liverpool could only manage to finish five points ahead of the London club with Suarez in their side [Liverpool do like the number five]. With Suarez playing for Arsenal, the Gunners would surely have finished above them and could even have won the league.
The simple fact is if Suarez wasn’t too good to play for Liverpool then there is no way he was too good to play for Arsenal.
Sorry Stevie, looks like you’ve slipped up again there.
http://metro.co.uk/2014/08/01/five-reasons-steven-gerrard-was-wrong-about-luis-suarez-being-too-good-for-arsenal-4817603/
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
Can someone explain to me how a club can refuse to honor a buy out clause?
Isn't the purpose of the buy out clause that if the buying club meets it, there is nothing the "selling" club can do about it?
Isn't the purpose of the buy out clause that if the buying club meets it, there is nothing the "selling" club can do about it?
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20402
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 28
Re: Rival Watch
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2571796/Luis-Suarez-DID-40million-buy-clause-reveals-Liverpool-owner-John-Henry-says-contracts-dont-mean-lot-England.html
I suspect Liverpool took a gamble by standing firm on Suarez. The tiniest error in wording on a contract can render clauses like these null and unenforceable.
Liverpool took their position, it was then up to Suarez and his agent and lawyers to fight it to enforce the clause, but they chose not to. If they had who knows whether or not they would have been successful.. I'm not a lawyer even if I did have a copy of his contract.
Taking my Arsenal hat off for a moment, I don't necessarily disagree with Gerrards comments and don't even find them particularly offensive. What he alleges he said at the start of last season turned out to be true. Two out of the three biggest clubs in the world made him a target, had his world cup incident not have occurred he would have gone to either RM or Barca for a world record fee.
On the other hand, had he come to Arsenal last season I believe with Suarez in our squad, we would have been one of the top 5 teams in the world. The same couldn't be said about Liverpool - as evident in actual events. He wasn't saying Arsenals not a step up from Liverpool - I am sure he knows it was then and frankly still is now - he's just saying Suarez is good enough for one of the giants.
I suspect Liverpool took a gamble by standing firm on Suarez. The tiniest error in wording on a contract can render clauses like these null and unenforceable.
Liverpool took their position, it was then up to Suarez and his agent and lawyers to fight it to enforce the clause, but they chose not to. If they had who knows whether or not they would have been successful.. I'm not a lawyer even if I did have a copy of his contract.
Taking my Arsenal hat off for a moment, I don't necessarily disagree with Gerrards comments and don't even find them particularly offensive. What he alleges he said at the start of last season turned out to be true. Two out of the three biggest clubs in the world made him a target, had his world cup incident not have occurred he would have gone to either RM or Barca for a world record fee.
On the other hand, had he come to Arsenal last season I believe with Suarez in our squad, we would have been one of the top 5 teams in the world. The same couldn't be said about Liverpool - as evident in actual events. He wasn't saying Arsenals not a step up from Liverpool - I am sure he knows it was then and frankly still is now - he's just saying Suarez is good enough for one of the giants.
Peccadillo- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1054
Join date : 2012-08-14
Age : 37
Re: Rival Watch
CBarca wrote:Can someone explain to me how a club can refuse to honor a buy out clause?
Isn't the purpose of the buy out clause that if the buying club meets it, there is nothing the "selling" club can do about it?
You need to be smoking some serious stuff to have the gall to do that, and then ask what the club matching the clause was smoking. Anyway, here's the quote:
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/462678/John-W-Henry-admits-Liverpool-ignored-Luis-Suarez-s-buy-out-clause-after-Arsenal-bid
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/mar/02/liverpool-john-henry-luis-suarez-clause
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/liverpool-owner-john-henry-luis-suarez-had-40m-buyout-clause-his-last-contract-1438597
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/26414167
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2571796/Luis-Suarez-DID-40million-buy-clause-reveals-Liverpool-owner-John-Henry-says-contracts-dont-mean-lot-England.html
Take your pick
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
Peccadillo wrote:
Taking my Arsenal hat off for a moment, I don't necessarily disagree with Gerrards comments and don't even find them particularly offensive. What he alleges he said at the start of last season turned out to be true. Two out of the three biggest clubs in the world made him a target, had his world cup incident not have occurred he would have gone to either RM or Barca for a world record fee.
On the other hand, had he come to Arsenal last season I believe with Suarez in our squad, we would have been one of the top 5 teams in the world. The same couldn't be said about Liverpool - as evident in actual events. He wasn't saying Arsenals not a step up from Liverpool - I am sure he knows it was then and frankly still is now - he's just saying Suarez is good enough for one of the giants.
See that's the point, if we had bought Suarez, we wouldn't have spent on Özil probably, but we would have been one of the giants you talk about. It's all ifs and buts.
But Gerrard, for all his maturity and experience and blah, shouldn't have taken a dig at another PL club, and a rival at that. Last year it was their owner, this year, their captain. Their 5-1 win at Anfield puts them in a position to make such comments, and it will be rather sweet when we pay them back for it.
I absolutely loved Wenger's mild, classic jibe in response though
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
As well as a minor swipe at a rival, which is normal.. He's also just trying to make himself look good .. and if it is true that he had a big influence in not just convincing Suarez to stay, but motivating him to the monster season he had to secure his dream move, then credit where credits due. Suarez and Liverpool ended up better for it.
Anyway as you said, we got Ozil instead and are now on a different if not longer path to success
Wenger is always all class.. like a sir.
Anyway as you said, we got Ozil instead and are now on a different if not longer path to success
Wenger is always all class.. like a sir.
Peccadillo- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1054
Join date : 2012-08-14
Age : 37
Re: Rival Watch
It's a very small-club mentality to get such big egos after one result, especially considering it led to nothing (for them) and that we beat them the other two matches we played them and did win something as a result (and with Sanogo up front)
MJ- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 8188
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
I don't know, MJ. Personally, I know some awesome, as well as some aweful fans of LFC. In quite a few ways, they are as obnoxious and/or defensive and/or wonderful and/or proud as the gunner fan base - I guess it is equally true for most clubs.
Despite the bad apples, I still find LFC a more likeable club than Chelsea or Manchesters - they also went through a hard phase like us and they have a load of history to be proud of - like us.
But sometimes, things that their management and/or fans say/do is just so
Despite the bad apples, I still find LFC a more likeable club than Chelsea or Manchesters - they also went through a hard phase like us and they have a load of history to be proud of - like us.
But sometimes, things that their management and/or fans say/do is just so
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
I do as well, and that's obviously directed at the bad apples who try to troll us with the 5-1 result.
MJ- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 8188
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
Surprised Man Utd haven't added more signings so far this summer, however after LvG's comments ahead of the Liverpool friendly, I expect their transfer season to begin this week.
Re: Rival Watch
Arsene Wenger on Frank Lampard: "If you look at a map, the shortest way from Chelsea to Manchester City is not to fly to New York first."
MJ- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 8188
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
FFS
Would love to meet Wenger one day.
Top dawg!
Would love to meet Wenger one day.
Top dawg!
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Club Supported :
Posts : 23080
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 27
Re: Rival Watch
Chelsea fan: Chelsea is bigger than Arsenal
Arsenal fan: How?
Chelsea fan: We always win trophies
Arsenal fan: But we have more trophies than you?
Chelsea fan: Those are history.
Arsenal fan: But we won a trophy last year and you didn't.
Chelsea fan: It doesn't matter.
Arsenal fan: Has Chelsea ever went a season unbeaten?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Has Chelsea ever won a Golden EPL trophy?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Does Chelsea have 13 EPL titles?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Does Chelsea have 11 FA Cup titles?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Was Chelsea founded before Arsenal?
Chelsea fan: No. Arsenal was founded before Chelsea, but that's history. Chelsea always win trophies and our fans are better than yours.
Arsenal fan: How many fans came out for your Champions League parade in London?
Chelsea fan: 90,000 fans.
Arsenal fan: How many fans came out for Arsenal FA Cup parade in London?
Chelsea fan: 250,000 fans,
Arsenal fan: So how is Chelsea bigger than Arsenal?
Chelsea fan: We always win trophies,
Arsenal fan: Right now, we are the FA Cup holders, and you are trophyless. In history, Arsenal have 40 trophies. Chelsea have 28 trophies.
Chelsea fan: We have a Champions League trophy and you don't.
Arsenal fan: Does that make you bigger than us?
Chelsea fan: Yes.
Arsenal fan: Nottingham Forest have two Champions League trophies. Does that make Nottingham better than Chelsea?
Arsenal fan: How?
Chelsea fan: We always win trophies
Arsenal fan: But we have more trophies than you?
Chelsea fan: Those are history.
Arsenal fan: But we won a trophy last year and you didn't.
Chelsea fan: It doesn't matter.
Arsenal fan: Has Chelsea ever went a season unbeaten?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Has Chelsea ever won a Golden EPL trophy?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Does Chelsea have 13 EPL titles?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Does Chelsea have 11 FA Cup titles?
Chelsea fan: No.
Arsenal fan: Was Chelsea founded before Arsenal?
Chelsea fan: No. Arsenal was founded before Chelsea, but that's history. Chelsea always win trophies and our fans are better than yours.
Arsenal fan: How many fans came out for your Champions League parade in London?
Chelsea fan: 90,000 fans.
Arsenal fan: How many fans came out for Arsenal FA Cup parade in London?
Chelsea fan: 250,000 fans,
Arsenal fan: So how is Chelsea bigger than Arsenal?
Chelsea fan: We always win trophies,
Arsenal fan: Right now, we are the FA Cup holders, and you are trophyless. In history, Arsenal have 40 trophies. Chelsea have 28 trophies.
Chelsea fan: We have a Champions League trophy and you don't.
Arsenal fan: Does that make you bigger than us?
Chelsea fan: Yes.
Arsenal fan: Nottingham Forest have two Champions League trophies. Does that make Nottingham better than Chelsea?
Sri- Wer ko, der ko
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Rival Watch
What is a Golden EPL trophy?
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Club Supported :
Posts : 23080
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 27
Re: Rival Watch
The trophy we got after the invincible season
RealGunner- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 89513
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Rival Watch
This is insane.
I say from now on, we send our youngsters on loan to a Turkish league for one season. This is the type of atmosphere that will help them to play under pressure.
AnJl- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1110
Join date : 2011-06-09
Age : 34
Re: Rival Watch
FC Porto announce that they will receive €30.5m for Eliaquim Mangala from Manchester City. They owned only 56.67% of the player
so his total cost was around 42M pounds?!!ffs
so his total cost was around 42M pounds?!!ffs
Sina- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9671
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 33
Re: Rival Watch
So City now have 6 CBs... LOL.
Kompany, Mangala, Boyata, Demichelis, Nastasic, Richards/Sagna (both can't be 2nd choice RB)
Surely this means they are going to sell Nastasic and maybe loan Boyata out..
* 7 CBS - I forgot Rekik... but he will almost certainly get loaned out.
Kompany, Mangala, Boyata, Demichelis, Nastasic, Richards/Sagna (both can't be 2nd choice RB)
Surely this means they are going to sell Nastasic and maybe loan Boyata out..
* 7 CBS - I forgot Rekik... but he will almost certainly get loaned out.
Peccadillo- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1054
Join date : 2012-08-14
Age : 37
Page 6 of 30 • 1 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 18 ... 30
Page 6 of 30
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 6:46 am by Harmonica
» MLS-thread
Today at 6:44 am by Harmonica
» Champions League '24/25
Today at 6:40 am by Thimmy
» The Official Real Madrid Matchday Thread 24 - 25
Today at 12:16 am by Cyborg
» GL NBA fantasy 24-25
Yesterday at 9:08 pm by Warrior
» General Games Discussion
Yesterday at 5:19 pm by Thimmy
» Premier League 2024/25
Yesterday at 7:48 am by Glory
» Jose Mourinho Sack Watch: Fenerbahce Edition
Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:47 pm by futbol_bill
» La Liga 2024/25
Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:05 pm by halamadrid2
» Erik Ten Hag Sack Watch
Mon Sep 30, 2024 12:18 pm by Vibe
» Bundesliga 2024/25
Sun Sep 29, 2024 9:10 pm by Vibe
» The official Tennis thread
Sun Sep 29, 2024 1:22 am by The Madrid One
» Marino: "Juventus is a team of Earl of attack"
Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:48 pm by Arquitecto