Theo Walcott for Daniel Sturridge?

Its all over the papers, I think Chelsea would be making a big mistake if they give up Sturridge. I know it wont happen but would you guys trade Walcott for Sturridge?

I would not even think twice about it I would trade Walcott for him.

Imagine Podolski, RVP and Sturridge in the same line up?

Sturridge is an Arsenal fan also, so he would be coming home.

No.

I would buy Sturridge , but i wouldn't trade him for Theo

No.

Theo is one of a kind, Great to have in the squad, even if we dont start him. He is a great asset to bring off the bench.

I would however buy sturridge if given a chance, great talent

Sturridge reminds me of young RVP, I think he will be a great player and I would like to have have both Theo and Sturridge but I just dont see Theo getting any better.

wages are to high also.

85 k a week? are you kidding me. Walcott has no idea what he doing when he is playing. If we give him 85 k the way he has been playing.

Well it's different to buy him n keeping Walcott ! BUT in this (thread's case) i would agree alsooo Sturridge is the best young pl. in PL currently..imo...sooo...YESSSSS

It was written by the sun afaik so I wouldn't get your hopes up too highly

Still though Dannys dad is a massive bellend.

If Walcott plays against us though we will be demolished.

Abramovich wrote:It was written by the sun afaik so I wouldn't get your hopes up too highly

Still though Dannys dad is a massive bellend.

Dont ruin the party.

I know its all bullshit but its nice to dream. Walcott would be perfect at Chelsea, if he don't perform well they will bench him not like at Arsenal where he gets worse game after game and he still walks in to starting line up.

NO. I would love to have Sturridge in our squad though but i still like Theo and i think he can still become a great player.

look what i started lol...



no but if chelsea were actually willing, i'd do this in a heartbeat. theo will turn up a great game every once in a while but he still isn't good enough to be starting for us week in and week out. Chambo is already a mile ahead of him and we'd probably get more out of sturridge on the wing than what walcott gives us. walcott's supposed real position is through the center but wenger has never found an opportunity for him there, but who knows how good he is there either. Joel Campbell could be better....

if walcott had any consistency I might think harder about it but he isn't so the decision is easy for me.

REWB wrote:id buy sturrigde, but hell no giving walcott to chelsea. walcott would score every time he faces us with his pace. plus sturridge wants to play up front, now is he going to do that with rvp around....nah.

we need to change the formation anyways. 4-4-1-1, RvP behind Sturridge is the move.

Walcott for Sturridge. Can we through some more deadwood in also.

6unner wrote:Walcott for Sturridge. Can we through some more deadwood in also.

smart thinking sir.

(On theo) As inconsistent as he is. We've invested too much time & money for us to give up on him now. He's still young! He will learn how to finish sooner rather than later I hope. It would be a HUGE mistake to let him go imho.