Arsenal FC

english_jewel wrote:

anirudhkitt wrote:

english_jewel wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

english_jewel wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

english_jewel wrote:Can we just call it Robin Van Persie FC?

Your just mad that RVP, who cost us 3m, is doing alot better than Torres, who cost ya 50mil.

If anything I'm praising him. If you want to compare lower money transfers outdoing higher money transfers then that's evident for both sides.

Your praising him, sure. But your making us look like a one man team which we aren't (Goonerjay already explained). Unless you just started the thread to joke around a little....

All I'm asking is where would your goals come from without RVP? His backup strikers are below average and he has been your main source of goals and assists. Without him you suddenly look very average in attack and without goals I'm pretty sure you won't be able to maintain a winning form.

But i still dont get the point of your question? Maybe Arsenal wouldnt have been as good without RVP. so what.? Even Barca without messi or barca 2006 without ronaldinho or france 98 without Zidane or Milan without Kaka , Argentina without Maradona.

Lots of great teams have talismanic players who are irreplaceable. Just because RVP is good for Arsenal and scores most of the goals dont make arsenal shit. What logic

I never said it made Arsenal shit. Merely too dependent.

Agreed that Arsenal is dependent on RVP to play well. But here is some fodder for you. When Cesc played, arsenal depended on him, when henry played they depended on him. Any player that plays well for any team anywhere, the team will depend on him.

I was just asking the point of you saying that arsenal should be renamed rvp. I thought you were trolling so called you out. If however, you were complementing arsenal, well then improve your communication skills. Peace OUT

It's the Henry situation all over again. Not that i'm complaining, mind you

anirudhkitt wrote:

english_jewel wrote:

anirudhkitt wrote:

english_jewel wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

english_jewel wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

english_jewel wrote:Can we just call it Robin Van Persie FC?

Your just mad that RVP, who cost us 3m, is doing alot better than Torres, who cost ya 50mil.

If anything I'm praising him. If you want to compare lower money transfers outdoing higher money transfers then that's evident for both sides.

Your praising him, sure. But your making us look like a one man team which we aren't (Goonerjay already explained). Unless you just started the thread to joke around a little....

All I'm asking is where would your goals come from without RVP? His backup strikers are below average and he has been your main source of goals and assists. Without him you suddenly look very average in attack and without goals I'm pretty sure you won't be able to maintain a winning form.

But i still dont get the point of your question? Maybe Arsenal wouldnt have been as good without RVP. so what.? Even Barca without messi or barca 2006 without ronaldinho or france 98 without Zidane or Milan without Kaka , Argentina without Maradona.

Lots of great teams have talismanic players who are irreplaceable. Just because RVP is good for Arsenal and scores most of the goals dont make arsenal shit. What logic

I never said it made Arsenal shit. Merely too dependent.

Agreed that Arsenal is dependent on RVP to play well. But here is some fodder for you. When Cesc played, arsenal depended on him, when henry played they depended on him. Any player that plays well for any team anywhere, the team will depend on him.

I was just asking the point of you saying that arsenal should be renamed rvp. I thought you were trolling so called you out. If however, you were complementing arsenal, well then improve your communication skills. Peace OUT

Butthurt ??

http://beckyms.blogspot.com/2007/05/how-to-stop-hating.html

HE JELLY.

Did you watch the game? Gervinho could have easily got the first goal but let the ball go to RVP for a safer shot

FC Robin Van Persie > FC 5-3

I dnt see what fuss everyteam has one player that elevates the team.

Is that a crime to have now.

I think some people are just butthurt at the fact what we arsenals fans have been sayin for years is true now.

We always said that if rvp could stay fit he be would one of the best strikers in the world.

and whilst you claim Arsenal would be average without RvP, Chelsea are average with Drogba, Torres, Anelka etc etc etc

butthurtmuchyoumad?

julias wrote:and whilst you claim Arsenal would be average without RvP, Chelsea are average with Drogba, Torres, Anelka etc etc etc

butthurtmuchyoumad?

....... LOL

That must be so painful for english_jewel now... you don't have even that one goalscorer, just waiting for defensive errors.

looooool ^

Yet again RVP with the only goals

Bitter, bitter smeg

Lex wrote:Bitter, bitter smeg

Running out of counter-arguments that you're relying on insults?

Right....nevermind the fact that they were both from inside the 6 yard box and laid on a platter for him. Lets forget the fact that Song dribbled past three players and delivered a perfect cross that no decent striker should miss....Yes, let's just ignore all those facts

Look at our assists charts. Everyone in the team is assisting; RVP is just getting the final touch.

Iceman wrote:Right....nevermind the fact that they were both from inside the 6 yard box and laid on a platter for him. Lets forget the fact that Song dribbled past three players and delivered a perfect cross that no decent striker should miss....

Look at our assists charts. Everyone in the team is assisting; RVP is just getting the final touch.

What are you talking about? Two games ago RVP was leading your assists chart (not sure if that has changed since then).

What's there left to argue?

It's clear you didn't watch the game, so there's no point in writing paragraphs and breaking down points to get any sort of point across.

Especially when you come out with "ooo RVP scored again" when both goals where created out of nothing by a DM and a CB

By the way, how did Torres do today?

Lex wrote:What's there left to argue?

It's clear you didn't watch the game, so there's no point in writing paragraphs and breaking down points to get any sort of point across.

Especially when you come out with "ooo RVP scored again" when both goals where created out of nothing by a DM and a CB

By the way, how did Torres do today?

Why do you insist on bringing up a player that is, first, irrelevant to the discussion and two, for some reason keeps getting talked about when no one even rates him. That's like constantly slamming a League 1 player for his faults, as that's how good people think he is.

Anyways, I don't know why people are saying that his goals didn't count as much as they were supposedly tap ins. No offense, but if that is the case why can't any of your other strikers match RVP's clinical finishing up in front of goal? There is a reason for that, and that's because his clinical finishing in front of goal is unmatched. It's nothing to be taken for granted for.

Even simpler: He has an amazing understanding with the players around him whilst the others don't

english_jewel wrote:

Iceman wrote:Right....nevermind the fact that they were both from inside the 6 yard box and laid on a platter for him. Lets forget the fact that Song dribbled past three players and delivered a perfect cross that no decent striker should miss....

Look at our assists charts. Everyone in the team is assisting; RVP is just getting the final touch.

What are you talking about? Two games ago RVP was leading your assists chart (not sure if that has changed since then).

That's completely untrue Gervinho is leading our assists chart now for 3-4 weeks. van Persie made 2 of his 3 assists two weeks ago against WBA. Ramsey has 4 assists and Gervinho 6. Don't know where are you getting this stuff.

I really think you watch Arsenal from Livescore or Flashscore.

Club relies on 1 player: lulz, without Whatshisface you're nothing.

Club is filled with stars: lulz, who cares about Whatshisface with that stacked team you have.

Sushi Master wrote:Club relies on 1 player: lulz, without Whatshisface you're nothing.

Club is filled with stars: lulz, who cares about Whatshisface with that stacked team you have.

Don't know about you but I have never heard something like what you're trying to portray. In fact, the general focus becomes on attacking one player that is not doing well and ignoring the rest.

english_jewel wrote:

Sushi Master wrote:Club relies on 1 player: lulz, without Whatshisface you're nothing.

Club is filled with stars: lulz, who cares about Whatshisface with that stacked team you have.

Don't know about you but I have never heard something like what you're trying to portray. In fact, the general focus becomes on attacking one player that is not doing well and ignoring the rest.

Happens all the time with Barca and Madrid players.

Used to happen to Chelsea.

It's not like Maradona dragging Serie C teams to championships. I mean, Arsenal are still a good team, if I recall correctly.

werent they supposed to be relegated according to a chelsea fan

I made RVP my FF captain and he stops scoring