Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1?

3 posters

Go down

Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1? Empty Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1?

Post by Onyx Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:03 pm

When Lampard got subbed off. I think there's better players than Sturridge and Anelka too for the RW and LW spots.

--------------Essien---Meireles
---New RW---------Mata--------New LW
-------------------Torres

Or they could buy an AM and play Mata on either wing.

Onyx
Forum Legend
Forum Legend

Club Supported : Real Madrid
Posts : 40128
Join date : 2011-06-05

Back to top Go down

Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1? Empty Re: Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1?

Post by Kick Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:44 am

No,

Sturridge needs to be closer to goal.

Besides McEachran will take Lampards spot soon enough.
Kick
Kick
Admin
Admin

Club Supported : Chelsea
Posts : 34814
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 30

Back to top Go down

Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1? Empty Re: Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1?

Post by fatman123 Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:49 am

and in the short term where do all these "new players" come from?
fatman123
fatman123
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Corinthians
Posts : 9615
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 30

Back to top Go down

Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1? Empty Re: Chelsea played better with 4-2-3-1?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum