Donald Trump Sack Watch
+36
urbaNRoots
Arquitecto
Babun
El Gunner
elitedam
futbol_bill
Kick
Firenze
sportsczy
Mamad
Vibe
Zagadka
Blue
FennecFox7
futbol
M99
Nishankly
iftikhar
BarrileteCosmico
rincon
Art Morte
VivaStPauli
Adit
Hapless_Hans
guest_07
Lex
Freeza
Pedram
Young Kaz
CBarca
Warrior
The Demon of Carthage
Myesyats
Unique
McLewis
RealGunner
40 posters
Page 29 of 40
Page 29 of 40 • 1 ... 16 ... 28, 29, 30 ... 34 ... 40
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
so Bernie isn't gunna win?
The world is a complete joke
The world is a complete joke
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Posts : 22636
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
McLewis wrote:Analysis: Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, who resisted strict coronavirus measures, says he just learned it transmits asymptomatically.
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) April 2, 2020
Health officials have been saying that for two months. https://t.co/o6EIWJN32p
This is what happens when we have governors listening to Trump, Rush Limbaugh and other right wing morons who have been downplaying this virus.
Many people are going to succumb to this virus because of Kemp's incompetence.
This puts his cheating to win the governorship over Stacey Abrams in stark perspective.
Kemp only won down here because hes racist.
Young Kaz- First Team
- Posts : 1558
Join date : 2019-03-22
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
El Gunner wrote:so Bernie isn't gunna win?
The world is a complete joke
Vote Malema brother.
Young Kaz- First Team
- Posts : 1558
Join date : 2019-03-22
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
elitedam wrote:sportsczy wrote:CBarca wrote:Biden is +3 over Trump in WI and the survey was taken March 24-29 AKA occurring during Trump's "rally 'round the flag" effect.
A long way to go until the election, and a lot will change.
But that's a bad sign for Trump
Electoral vote maps are the important indicators... not popular votes directly. Look at those.
That's what he did. He's looking at Wisconsin polling data.
Yep.
I agree with you Sports, definitely, but that's why I pulled WI data specifically.
I've been saying for a while now that all I care about it rust belt data. I'm not interested in much else. Although North Carolina and Arizona are interesting.
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20394
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
That's also why I think that Klobuchar is the best pick for Biden's VP.
She's not only an extremely competent senator who ran a pretty good campaign overall to be honest, she's a moderate, a female, and she's got crazy rust belt appeal. People here really like her. She wins MN by insane percentages. Urban, rural. Doesn't matter.
They would be a moderate team that independents can get behind. Democrats will gladly vote for that duo. Progressives will by and large bite their tongue because it's better than Trump. Black vote? Biden already has it. I feel that Kamala is an appeal to the black vote he already has (and do black Americans really even like her that much anwyay?). Biden needs to focus on the white middle class in the rust belt and I think Klobuchar is easily the best candidate for that group.
And if you don't have faith in Biden as a President, why not Klobuchar?
She's not only an extremely competent senator who ran a pretty good campaign overall to be honest, she's a moderate, a female, and she's got crazy rust belt appeal. People here really like her. She wins MN by insane percentages. Urban, rural. Doesn't matter.
They would be a moderate team that independents can get behind. Democrats will gladly vote for that duo. Progressives will by and large bite their tongue because it's better than Trump. Black vote? Biden already has it. I feel that Kamala is an appeal to the black vote he already has (and do black Americans really even like her that much anwyay?). Biden needs to focus on the white middle class in the rust belt and I think Klobuchar is easily the best candidate for that group.
And if you don't have faith in Biden as a President, why not Klobuchar?
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20394
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Young Kaz wrote:El Gunner wrote:so Bernie isn't gunna win?
The world is a complete joke
Vote Malema brother.
i would if he wasn't irresponsibly racist. The country deserves a more astute, racially integrative socialist party
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Club Supported :
Posts : 22636
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
El Gunner wrote:Young Kaz wrote:El Gunner wrote:so Bernie isn't gunna win?
The world is a complete joke
Vote Malema brother.
i would if he wasn't irresponsibly racist. The country deserves a more astute, racially integrative socialist party
He has heart
And he was 100% true about Indians. The quickest way to have your head chopped off is to be the asian or black potential spouse of a South Indian businessman's daughter.
Young Kaz- First Team
- Posts : 1558
Join date : 2019-03-22
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
it's quite so obvious how the economic + racial divide shapes the constant results of SA's elections.
EFF will never get the Western Cape (Cape Town) and Gauteng (Joburg & Pretoria) provinces, because that's DA land. And they also won't get the Eastern rural parts of the country because that's vastly ANC land - the party that brought SA indepedence.
There's been talk between an EFF and DA coalition to finally get rid of the ANC dominion, but that coalition will never work because SA is still too heated when it comes to skin in the game
EFF will never get the Western Cape (Cape Town) and Gauteng (Joburg & Pretoria) provinces, because that's DA land. And they also won't get the Eastern rural parts of the country because that's vastly ANC land - the party that brought SA indepedence.
There's been talk between an EFF and DA coalition to finally get rid of the ANC dominion, but that coalition will never work because SA is still too heated when it comes to skin in the game
El Gunner- An Oakland City Warrior
- Club Supported :
Posts : 22636
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
DA is dead on arrival with black voters in large numbers, and EFF knows that truth more than anybody.
Young Kaz- First Team
- Posts : 1558
Join date : 2019-03-22
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Donald Trump has fired the inspector general for the intelligence community who handled the whistleblower complaint that led to his impeachment, prompting fierce criticism from Democrats.
The US president chose a Friday night, with America consumed by the coronavirus pandemic, to tell the House of Representatives and Senate intelligence committees of his decision to dismiss Michael Atkinson.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/04/donald-trump-fires-intelligence-watchdog-michael-atkinson-impeachment
Hapless_Hans- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 34047
Join date : 2013-09-17
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Hapless_Hans wrote:Donald Trump has fired the inspector general for the intelligence community who handled the whistleblower complaint that led to his impeachment, prompting fierce criticism from Democrats.
The US president chose a Friday night, with America consumed by the coronavirus pandemic, to tell the House of Representatives and Senate intelligence committees of his decision to dismiss Michael Atkinson.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/04/donald-trump-fires-intelligence-watchdog-michael-atkinson-impeachment
It's absolutely ridiculous that the USA president has all this power lmao.
Art Morte- Forum legendest
- Club Supported :
Posts : 18314
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 38
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Unfortunately, the ICIG (Intelligence Community Inspector General) is a presidential appointee. They do not have to go through Congressional confirmation so this makes the position completely beholden to the President.
The only realistic thing that can be done to prevent this in the future is to make that position subject to confirmation and bring it within the system of checks and balances.
Does nothing right now though.
The irony? Trump and his supporters will call this "draining the swamp".
Personally, I think it's an attempt at deflecting away from the thousands who are dead because of his stupidity. It's what Trump always has done when things get really bad, he deflects and gives the media something else to look at so that the really bad thing doesn't get as much attention. He's been doing this since he was a candidate. And we fall for it every time.
I hope it doesn't happen this time. This is bad for Atkinson, but it tells nothing we don't already know about Trump. He's corrupt, vindictive and he's every bit as guilty of what he was impeached of. This is proof.
And yet people are dying. This is small potatoes in comparison.
The only realistic thing that can be done to prevent this in the future is to make that position subject to confirmation and bring it within the system of checks and balances.
Does nothing right now though.
The irony? Trump and his supporters will call this "draining the swamp".
Personally, I think it's an attempt at deflecting away from the thousands who are dead because of his stupidity. It's what Trump always has done when things get really bad, he deflects and gives the media something else to look at so that the really bad thing doesn't get as much attention. He's been doing this since he was a candidate. And we fall for it every time.
I hope it doesn't happen this time. This is bad for Atkinson, but it tells nothing we don't already know about Trump. He's corrupt, vindictive and he's every bit as guilty of what he was impeached of. This is proof.
And yet people are dying. This is small potatoes in comparison.
McLewis- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13341
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Actually, the President should have this power... the problem is when you elect a president that acts like a 10-year-old.
sportsczy- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21455
Join date : 2011-12-07
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Trump's predecessors used this power correctly. I agree on that much. His bending and twisting of the process has exposed its cracks that should be shored up though or successors (Dem and Republican) will exploit them.
McLewis- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13341
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Yeah, because the correct procedure would have been:
the Ukraine scandal events get exposed by the guy responsible to handle whistle blower complaints, the president gets impeached and removed because the evidence is overwhelming, and then he wouldn't be around to use his power to fire the guy who handled the whistle blower complaint.
the Ukraine scandal events get exposed by the guy responsible to handle whistle blower complaints, the president gets impeached and removed because the evidence is overwhelming, and then he wouldn't be around to use his power to fire the guy who handled the whistle blower complaint.
Hapless_Hans- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 34047
Join date : 2013-09-17
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Well let's be honest... if you look at the data, Trump has actually used executive orders, which is the true measure of unilateral action by the President, no more and no less than his predecessors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_federal_executive_orders
The mainstream media, whether left or right, are both equally guilty of "false news" and "convenient news".
If you're going to try and impeach a president based on abuse of power... then there better be proof of abuse of power based on a very clear benchmark. That doesn't exist. There is absolutely ZERO case for impeachment. You may agree or disagree with his actions... but that's not what we're talking about here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_federal_executive_orders
The mainstream media, whether left or right, are both equally guilty of "false news" and "convenient news".
If you're going to try and impeach a president based on abuse of power... then there better be proof of abuse of power based on a very clear benchmark. That doesn't exist. There is absolutely ZERO case for impeachment. You may agree or disagree with his actions... but that's not what we're talking about here.
Last edited by sportsczy on Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
sportsczy- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21455
Join date : 2011-12-07
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Executive orders are not a measure of unilateral decision making but of control of congress. Trump had a majority for 2 of the past 3 years so he didn't need to use them. Obama used them because he had no choice (in his view), but he would've preferred to do something more permanent if he had been able to.
BarrileteCosmico- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 28277
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 33
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
BarrileteCosmico wrote:Executive orders are not a measure of unilateral decision making but of control of congress. Trump had a majority for 2 of the past 3 years so he didn't need to use them. Obama used them because he had no choice (in his view), but he would've preferred to do something more permanent if he had been able to.
Completely disagree. Congress is supposed to decide on policy. Presidents bypass congress and issue executive orders because either a) congress can't decide or b) the president doesn't feel congress will decide in his favor.
In the recent past, the presidents veto decisions they don't like unless there's a 2/3 vote by the Senate (there never is) and go straight to executive orders.
And Obama had both congress and senate during his entire first term. Trump only had it for 2 years.
sportsczy- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21455
Join date : 2011-12-07
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Obama only had congress for 2 of his 8 years. After 2010 it was split and obstructionist.
BarrileteCosmico- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 28277
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 33
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Obama used 146 in his first four years at the height of a global recession. He used 121 (and then an additional 8 during the lame duck period) in his second term.
Trump is at 140 with the rest of 2020 still to go.
George W. Bush was a prolific user in his first four years (most likely due to 9/11) but in his second term used less than Obama and Trump.
I think, at best, you can say that Trump has been as prolific as previous presidents. At worst, you might argue that he's actually been a worse "abuser" given that he's stayed roughly in line with Obama/Bush despite inheriting an historic economy and also two years of an entirely Republican Congress (by a really good margin).
Your numbers don't really help you here with your claim. Unless your argument is Trump vs all 20th century presidents, but I certainly wouldn't make that argument since there is a pretty marked difference between the world today and the world Truman served through
Trump is at 140 with the rest of 2020 still to go.
George W. Bush was a prolific user in his first four years (most likely due to 9/11) but in his second term used less than Obama and Trump.
I think, at best, you can say that Trump has been as prolific as previous presidents. At worst, you might argue that he's actually been a worse "abuser" given that he's stayed roughly in line with Obama/Bush despite inheriting an historic economy and also two years of an entirely Republican Congress (by a really good margin).
Your numbers don't really help you here with your claim. Unless your argument is Trump vs all 20th century presidents, but I certainly wouldn't make that argument since there is a pretty marked difference between the world today and the world Truman served through
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20394
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
It absolutely does. He's right on line with every recent President... no better, no worse. In fact, most of his executive orders were more for show with very little impact on actual policy while his predecessors signed far more impactful orders.
Also, I don't have to make a case for Trump. You guys are saying he should be impeached... it's your responsibility to make an overwhelming case for that... and you can't. That's been the major flaw since the beginning. It's all based on very scant proof and hearsay. I dislike Trump... but he hasn't done anything different than his predecessors. In fact, if I'm honest, both Bush Jr and Obama did far shadier shit in the Middle East & Africa and I saw it with my own two eyes.
This impeachment thing is a bunch of left wing nonsense honestly.
Call out his lack of political acumen and quasi-racist stances... that's fair. Call out that he's turning his back on historic allies... that's fair. But this is nonsense.
Also, I don't have to make a case for Trump. You guys are saying he should be impeached... it's your responsibility to make an overwhelming case for that... and you can't. That's been the major flaw since the beginning. It's all based on very scant proof and hearsay. I dislike Trump... but he hasn't done anything different than his predecessors. In fact, if I'm honest, both Bush Jr and Obama did far shadier shit in the Middle East & Africa and I saw it with my own two eyes.
This impeachment thing is a bunch of left wing nonsense honestly.
Call out his lack of political acumen and quasi-racist stances... that's fair. Call out that he's turning his back on historic allies... that's fair. But this is nonsense.
sportsczy- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21455
Join date : 2011-12-07
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
I haven't said shit. I do agree it was right he was impeached. But I don't care about his # of executive orders.
I saw you mention # of orders and I wanted to take a look at your numbers to see if they supported your case. The idea that Trump has been using less EO's didn't seem likely to me, prima facie.
And when I looked at the numbers, I had to refute you because you didn't bother to adjust for # of years in office or offer any context. So I did.
You rail against the media, but your argument reminded me of them. Data without context and without proper analysis of the numbers. And now you've edited your post to suit your new argument, that his EO's are in line with predecessors.You originally said he used "far, far less".
For me personally, EO's are not the reason why I think Trump has been a bad president. I even refused judgement in my last post (I set up a best case/worst case that depended on how one might want to spin the numbers). I just chimed in to refute your argument.
I saw you mention # of orders and I wanted to take a look at your numbers to see if they supported your case. The idea that Trump has been using less EO's didn't seem likely to me, prima facie.
And when I looked at the numbers, I had to refute you because you didn't bother to adjust for # of years in office or offer any context. So I did.
You rail against the media, but your argument reminded me of them. Data without context and without proper analysis of the numbers. And now you've edited your post to suit your new argument, that his EO's are in line with predecessors.You originally said he used "far, far less".
For me personally, EO's are not the reason why I think Trump has been a bad president. I even refused judgement in my last post (I set up a best case/worst case that depended on how one might want to spin the numbers). I just chimed in to refute your argument.
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20394
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 27
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
In terms of impactful EOs, it is far far less. I just didn't want to go into a long explanation of what that means. Closing down Guantanamo Bay, raising the minimum wage, etc... those are greatly impactful. Signing an order to build a wall that will never be built, the "Muslim ban" (which was obviously immediately blocked), etc.... those are just PR stunts.
sportsczy- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 21455
Join date : 2011-12-07
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Finally got around to installing this simple but effective addon
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/president-florida-man/
The internet is a better place now
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/president-florida-man/
The internet is a better place now
Hapless_Hans- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 34047
Join date : 2013-09-17
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Lmao thats actually hilarious
Myesyats- World Class Contributor
- Club Supported :
Posts : 19129
Join date : 2015-05-03
Age : 95
Re: Donald Trump Sack Watch
Mike Pence caught on hot mic delivering empty boxes of PPE for a PR stunt. pic.twitter.com/IduvGhiPwj
— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) May 8, 2020
I repeat: Trump is stupid, but Pence is literally evil.
McLewis- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 13341
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 35
Page 29 of 40 • 1 ... 16 ... 28, 29, 30 ... 34 ... 40
Similar topics
» Donald Trump Sack Watch
» Donald Trump watch
» Donald Trump watch
» The New, Official and Definitive José Mourinho Denunciation Thread
» Donald Trump, Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, Eurasianism, Mussolini and his chin, Fascism, David duke kkk
» Donald Trump watch
» Donald Trump watch
» The New, Official and Definitive José Mourinho Denunciation Thread
» Donald Trump, Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, Eurasianism, Mussolini and his chin, Fascism, David duke kkk
Page 29 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 4:14 pm by The Madrid One
» The Lionel Messi Appreciation Thread & Fan Club IV
Today at 12:34 pm by Myesyats
» Kobbie Mainoo Watch
Today at 12:07 pm by Glory
» GL NBA fantasy 23-24
Today at 7:02 am by El Gunner
» Transfer Rumours V6
Today at 3:59 am by Myesyats
» The Official Final Fantasy thread
Yesterday at 8:41 pm by BarrileteCosmico
» The Official PlayStation 1 Gaming Threads
Yesterday at 7:34 pm by Vibe
» La Liga 2023/24
Yesterday at 6:34 pm by Nivash
» Lamine Yamal Hype thread
Yesterday at 12:02 pm by El Gunner
» General Games Discussion
Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:36 pm by Myesyats
» De Rossi
Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:02 pm by rincon
» The Official Dwayne Wade <<<<<< you thread
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:40 am by Vibe
» France NT News, Formations & Results
Mon Mar 25, 2024 3:16 am by BarcaLearning