ISIS terror attacks around the world

terrorists seem to have wisened up, they realize that planning long term complex attacks leads to them being picked up by intelligence agencies more often than not and you can cause as much damage just jumping into a vehicle and driving it into a group of civilians. incredibly difficult to stop that unless you're an idiot running your mouth beforehand.

Unique probably doesn't even know where Chechnya is or of the atrocities that Kadyrov has committed as Putin's puppet so that he can 'stabilize' the region

stop looking at Russia as a role-model ffs

Firenze wrote:Unique probably doesn't even know where Chechnya is or of the atrocities that Kadyrov has committed as Putin's puppet so that he can 'stabilize' the region

stop looking at Russia as a role-model ffs

the enemy of my enemy is my friend. And all that.

People glorifying Putin

You guys should look at the natural resources Russia has and with very low population one would expect a decent life there. Reality is Russian girls forced to become prostitutes in every other country.

Putin and his state owned companies have looted Russia dry. Among the ultra rich people there is a talk about Putin being world's first Trillionaire.

Adit wrote:People glorifying Putin

You guys should look at the natural resources Russia has and with very low population one would expect a decent life there. Reality is Russian girls forced to become prostitutes in every other country.

Putin and his state owned companies have looted Russia dry. Among the ultra rich people there is a talk about Putin being world's first Trillionaire.

my point about Russia not taking any shit was aimed at the Russian people. No way the Russian people would put up with the shit that goes on in Sweden. They would arm up and deal with the problem themselves. Putin would turn a blind eye to it if they did though.

Adit wrote:People glorifying Putin

You guys should look at the natural resources Russia has and with very low population one would expect a decent life there. Reality is Russian girls forced to become prostitutes in every other country.

Putin and his state owned companies have looted Russia dry. Among the ultra rich people there is a talk about Putin being world's first Trillionaire.

When you consider the mess Putin inherited (70 years of communism), 10 years of Yeltisnism and the state the country was in, defeated, humiliated, and embarrassed, he's done a good job. Very flawed, but all east he's restored pride into the nation.





This is the man America, and Liberals in EU and Europe want ruling Russia. They ADORED Yeltsin and even rigged the election in 1996 to make sure he's reelected so they can steal everything from Russia and Russian people, life expectancy dropped to lower than war times ffs !!

Adit wrote:Why do British allow all these jihadists to preach freely?. From hate spreading madrassas to these type of people are free to spread their ideology. Freespeech is good only if everyone can keep it to just speech. Britain clearly unable to do so.

Because it's progressive to let the rapists rape & the terrorists to terrorize, in the name of diversity, of course. Which is the new normal, apparently. As Donald would have tweeted out: "Sad!".

Firenze wrote:Unique probably doesn't even know where Chechnya is or of the atrocities that Kadyrov has committed as Putin's puppet so that he can 'stabilize' the region

stop looking at Russia as a role-model ffs

Chechnya is a shithole and the only rule they know is dictatorship. Kadyrov is horrible and perhaps the only person in Russia that Putin is shit scared of.

Putin is so scared of Kadyrov that he opened Europe' largest mosque in Moscow and allows Chechnya to have its own army. So Long as there are no wars.

One of the platforms of Putin' main presidential candidate for next year' election, Navalny, is this matter. I heard Navalny wanted to get rid of Chechnya and let it become independent, so long as they won't be part of Russia. lol, he also proposed a border wall with Central Asian countries and kick out illegal aliens in Moscow.

Sounds familiar

Some people saying there was 2 other people in the back of the car but the news saying it was one man

lmao the senior home affairs correspondant didn't even bother to check whether they guy is in prison before naming him the attacker on TV.

It even says on his wikipedia

you see, in my world, if you are a 'senior home affairs correspondant' for a media company and TV station, and after a high profile terror attack in London you go on TV to name a guy the alleged attacker who is in prison as can be researched in 5 seconds, you'd be out of a job and not getting one in this line of work again.

Unbelievable.

Israel blaming Muslim, what's new.

Well, the attacker is most likely an extremist muslim or a member of ISIS but this time it was the wrong name.

We'll have to wait and see. I imagine it wasn't an actual ISIS militant, but just an extremist IS wanabe.

rincon wrote:We'll have to wait and see. I imagine it wasn't an actual ISIS militant, but just an extremist IS wanabe.

For the victims, the difference between those two categories doesn't matter. That's the unbeatable genius of ISIS's free for all franchise strategy.

can see these being on every street in the near future in major cities and towns

Hapless_Hans wrote:

rincon wrote:We'll have to wait and see. I imagine it wasn't an actual ISIS militant, but just an extremist IS wanabe.

For the victims, the difference between those two categories doesn't matter. That's the unbeatable genius of ISIS's free for all franchise strategy.

Yes of course

Hapless_Hans wrote:

rincon wrote:We'll have to wait and see. I imagine it wasn't an actual ISIS militant, but just an extremist IS wanabe.

For the victims, the difference between those two categories doesn't matter. That's the unbeatable genius of ISIS's free for all franchise strategy.

I believe their unbeatable strategy is that the actions of these extremists may instigate racist attitudes in ignorant people who can't see the difference between your average muslim and terrorists, or is simply looking for someone to blame for it all. That resentment may, in turn, lead to a vicious circle of hatred.

Myesyats wrote:

Adit wrote:Why do British allow all these jihadists to preach freely?. From hate spreading madrassas to these type of people are free to spread their ideology. Freespeech is good only if everyone can keep it to just speech. Britain clearly unable to do so.

Because it's progressive to let the rapists rape & the terrorists to terrorize, in the name of diversity, of course. Which is the new normal, apparently. As Donald would have tweeted out: "Sad!".

Probably the most ironic post in here. Calling out others for hate preaching while you are doing the same.

Your posts are borderline breaking the forum rules these days. Specially when they get reported on a daily basis. Consider this as an informal warning. Tone down a level or two with what you are saying.

Why does this forum have a religion and politics section when it's clear to see that nobody can criticise religion without getting docked warning level or getting banned. In all of these threads only me seppi and myesyats have criticised religion and I was banned for 2 months. Myesyats is on his last warning and seppi is down to his last 25%. Why even bother having these debates when the admin will only allow opinions they agree with.

There is a difference between debating, like you are doing right now with that post, and the kind of posts that get you or others warnings and bans.

rincon wrote:There is a difference between debating, like you are doing right now with that post, and the kind of posts that get you or others warnings and bans.

not once have I or the other 2 as far as I know have attacked anyone on the forum with personal insults. We don't use rude cuss words. We don't make threats to harm anyone. We don't encourage people to do harm to others. We don't call people racist names. So I'm not sure what rules we are breaking tbh.

El Gunner wrote:

Firenze wrote:

can see these being on every street in the near future in major cities and towns

What are they?

they stop cars from mounting the pavement

Unique wrote:

rincon wrote:There is a difference between debating, like you are doing right now with that post, and the kind of posts that get you or others warnings and bans.

not once have I or the other 2 as far as I know have attacked anyone on the forum with personal insults. We don't use rude cuss words. We don't make threats to harm anyone. We don't encourage people to do harm to others. We don't call people racist names. So I'm not sure what rules we are breaking tbh.

Tbh since you came back from the ban I haven't thought you have broken any rules or insulted anyone. The other two on the other hand...