Pellegrini: Anti-football Chelsea don't deserve PL

"It would be very disappointing, for football, for the fans, for everyone [if Chelsea win the Premier League]."

"I think that the most attractive football, the more goals you can score, should be rewarded."

"I'm not saying it's not important to defend very well. Football is attacking and defending. But I think that big teams must play as big teams."

Dat Mourinho hate

the same anti-football who dominated the City at Etihad ?

Robespierre wrote:the same anti-football who dominated the City at Etihad ?

go tell him

Being disappointed that a certain team won and saying that they didn't deserve to win are two totally different things


It would be disappointing if Madrid or Barca won La Liga and not Atletico to most neutrals.. It was disappointing that Bayern beat Dortmund in the CL final.. That's not saying that bayern or Madrid and barca don't deserve to win/have won at all

*Makes thread title quoting Pellegrini as saying Chelsea play anti-football and don't deserve PL*

*Posts paragraph in which the words anti-football and deserve are used 0 times*

GL

Pellegrini...what a total gentleman.

that amazing post-game interview yesterday......you'd feel like it was your grandpa

VendettaRed07 wrote:Being disappointed that a certain team won and saying that they didn't deserve to win are two totally different things

u can reasonably assume from his quotes that thats what he means

"I think that the most attractive football, the more goals you can score, should be rewarded."

meaning city should have more points than chelsea because they have more goals...meaning city should be top of the league...meaning city deserve it more than chelsea due to attacking football

this is beside the point however

Natalie Portman wrote:Pellegrini...what a total gentleman.

he aint a gentleman, i can confirm

The engineer who can't count is probably better of keeping his mouth shut

El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:

VendettaRed07 wrote:Being disappointed that a certain team won and saying that they didn't deserve to win are two totally different things

u can reasonably assume from his quotes that thats what he means

"I think that the most attractive football, the more goals you can score, should be rewarded."

meaning city should have more points than chelsea because they have more goals...meaning city should be top of the league...meaning city deserve it more than chelsea due to attacking football

this is beside the point however

Yeah you can assume what he says possibly means, but altering the quote to remove the possibility of ambiguous interpretation is misleading

Mou himself called teams out himself like Westham for parking the bus. Pellegrini says he thinks it's probably better for football that if a team that tries to attack and take control of games more often wins the title rather than the one that reacts to opponents. There's nothing wrong with that because it's not a direct attack at Chelsea as being undeserving but more of an idealistic point of view

Truth hurt bus parker fans . Mouthrinho parks only planes not buses .That too billion dollar planes .

may be he should channel his anger on "bad kompany"

sree999 wrote:Truth hurt bus parker fans . Mouthrinho parks only planes not buses .That too billion dollar planes .

since when an opinion is " truth " ?

nothing in football is more boring than possession and non stop , pansy passing.

farfan wrote:

sree999 wrote:Truth hurt bus parker fans . Mouthrinho parks only planes not buses .That too billion dollar planes .

since when an opinion is " truth " ?

nothing in football is more boring than possession  and non stop , pansy passing.

that also considered opinion only

He's being a sore loser when he says it will be dissapointing "for everyone" if Chelsea won the title. Says who?

I doubt Chelsea fans give a flying ____ how they won it, then you have United and Everton fans delighted that they stopped Liverpool from winning the title.

3 sets of fans delighted with the outcome. Pellegrini still has a lot to learn about English football, bless him...

Regardless of any merit the opinion of Pelle may have.

He just appears to be a massive ass (like Mou as well) by airing it. It is surprising how very few managers manage to hold their mouth. It makes your respect Ancelotti a little for knowing how well he speaks about everyone else.

El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:

Natalie Portman wrote:Pellegrini...what a total gentleman.

he aint a gentleman, i can confirm

Mate, you couldn't confirm the time if you had a watch on both wrists.

guest_07 wrote:

farfan wrote:

sree999 wrote:Truth hurt bus parker fans . Mouthrinho parks only planes not buses .That too billion dollar planes .

since when an opinion is " truth " ?

nothing in football is more boring than possession  and non stop , pansy passing.

that also considered opinion only

i know , it's jsut my opinion , not the absolute truth.

If something's disappointing it's Pelle's comments. Everyone can have their favourite style of football, but especially as a manager you should appreciate that there are more than one way to play the game. Especially as a manager, you should appreciate that it's the results that matter in the end, not the style.

Chelsea have the best back-four in the league and the worst strikers of the title contenders, so it just makes sense they try to play to their strengths rather than weaknesses.

Pelle just want's to hit back at Mou.

Funny that after these comments Pellegrini will be forced to be a hardcore Mourinhoista when Chelsea face Liverpool

Pellegrini is 100% correct.It would be sad for PL football if shite on stick turgid 19th century football Maureen win the title.

No neutral will prefer watching Chelsea's soul destroying football ahead of positive football by City Liverpool or Arsenal.

Pellegrini would be secretly glad if Liverpool wins the title

Also, Chelsea have not been a shit on a stick team this season at all. In fact, if they had better strikers they might have been walking the league by now (which is no excuse for them at all).

They have been somewhat entertaining in the matches I watched them, and their record against top opposition (including City who were outplayed twice) is stellar.

BeautifulGame wrote:Pellegrini is 100% correct.It would be sad for PL football if shite on stick turgid 19th century football Maureen win the title.

No neutral will prefer watching Chelsea's soul destroying football ahead of positive football by City Liverpool or Arsenal.

What a poor troll post