Re: 2014/15 Chelsea Kit Thread

by Shed Wed Jul 23, 2014 4:12 pm

Soul wrote:Better than the leak? It is the same thing Shed

No I mean it looked better in the leak picture of just the shirt (post) than it actually does on the players.

by Shed Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:53 am

by Kick Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:55 am

Drogba

by Shed Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:36 am

by Shed Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:15 am

2014/15 Chelsea Kit Thread - Page 7 Tumblr_nc28spHbwn1tnakrwo1_500

-

Thoughts on this kit?

by Kick Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:22 am

Better than the red one, imo.

It's ok. Would be better plain.

by Shed Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:24 am

I thought it was horrifying upon first seeing it yesterday but I suppose it's not that bad.

by Soul Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:08 am

uh, no. That's a terrible kit. The only thing making it 'modern' is because it's being broadcasted in HD. Anything less and you'd think he was from the 80s

by rwo power Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:54 am

Manuel Neuer uses the same in the CL:

Spoiler:

I'm not so fond of that grey pattern, I have to admit. Sometimes the adidas designers have weird ideas.

by Kick Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:56 am

They always make two very nice kits and the rest are poor, for us anyway.

by Shed Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:32 pm

2014/15 Chelsea Kit Thread - Page 7 ByoPSI8CEAA04KL

Confirmed.

by Kick Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:44 am

Apparently it's 25m pounds a season. 7m higher than Samsung.

by Shed Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:49 am

I'll take it.

As we agreed, their logo doesn't look that bad on our kits at all.

by Kick Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:56 am

It's not Utd kind of money but it is decent.

by Shed Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:04 pm

Samsung To Pull Chelsea FC Sponsorship, Turkish Airlines To Take Over With Larger Package:
Samsung is set to terminate its multimillion-dollar shirt sponsorship deal with English Premier League leaders Chelsea FC at the end of this current season, sources have told Business Insider, which also understands Turkish Airways is due to take over as kit sponsors and signing up to a much larger deal that could include the club's stadium
http://www.businessinsider.com/samsung-ending-sponsorship-of-epl-club-chelsea-2014-10

"...that could include the club's stadium"

Neutral

by Kick Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:03 pm

Can we do that since the CPO exists?

by Shed Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:05 pm

I don't know if the naming rights of the stadium have anything to do with the ownership of the ground it's on.

by Kick Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:13 pm

Surely they'd have some kind of say in it at the least?

I doubt any fan wants to see it changed, especially since we're doing fine, FFP wise.

by Shed Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:16 pm

Oh I'm certain most don't, but Roman hardly has a history of showing deference to the will of the supporters...

by Kick Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:18 pm

It'll be interesting to see.

by Sponsored content