Underrated Players

Nani and Gervinho underrated for me for the fact that these two guys are being made scapegoats at their respective clubs when there are clearly more shittier players than them at the club.

Thomas Muller , this is the kind of players who make you WIN

the most under-rated player at the moment is Kaka to be honest. Excellent footballer with acute skills, yet he is considered a flop by real madrid fans and institute despite the fact that he is their second best player, well technically third after ronaldo and Lopez.

Bénin wrote:Thomas Muller , this is the kind of players who make you WIN

I can't count how often people wrote they want to see him benched. But no Thomas Müller = no Bayern or Germany win.

donttreadonred wrote:Hazard may not even be the third best player in the Premier League right now, much less the third best in the world. (Bale, Suarez, Van Persie, Silva, Yaya Toure, and Mata are all on his level or above it at the moment.)

You can argue about potential all you want. There's no doubt he has immense potential. In fact, that's exactly why Chelsea paid such a high price for him. It wasn't because he was one of the best in the world; it was because he could become one of the best in the world. That said, potential means precisely f***-all until it's realized. There are 12-year-olds on YouTube that have immense potential, but that doesn't mean they will be the next Ronaldo/Messi/Maradona/Pele.

Blame Mancini if you want...

Those two have not performed well this season.

Shawcross

remy

barton

Steven Taylor

Ever Banega

Gerrard, Agger, and Griezmann

luquitas ocampos too, well and truly up there with any other teenage talent.

when you guys watch monaco next season you'll see, this kid is unreal. hard to believe hes so young

huntsman wrote:the most under-rated player at the moment is Kaka to be honest. Excellent footballer with acute skills, yet he is considered a flop by real madrid fans and institute despite the fact that he is their second best player, well technically third after ronaldo and Lopez.

we know

rwo power wrote:

Bénin wrote:Thomas Muller , this is the kind of players who make you WIN

I can't count how often people wrote they want to see him benched. But no Thomas Müller = no Bayern or Germany win.

Agreed. His lack of flashiness makes people think he's an average player, for some reason.

But few have his brains or workrate.

While most talk about Reus, Götze or Özil, Müller is quietly winning triple trophies

This hazard nonsense has gone far enough, take a lap all of you

To go back to the Mata debate, He has 20 goals and 37 assists in 64 matches this season. A goal or assist every .89 games.

He is far better than Hazard or Oscar and is one of the best players in the EPL. If not the best. Only players who could be better than him is Bale, RVP and Carrick.

huntsman wrote:Hazard from Chelsea, third best player in the world right now and is nominated to dethrone at least Ronaldo in the next couple of years.

Kaka from Madrid; second best player after Ronaldo. Madrid never loses when he starts and he scores almost every game he plays and has more assists than the likes of Ozil who despite being a flop is a starter.

Podolski. All joking aside hes an amazing footballer. People dont realize this bexause hes not flashy. Not to mention that at Arsenal and for 2 years fot Germany hes been played out of his preferred position, and hed been struggling with injuries this season. Its no coincidence that he had a goal every other game for Germany until he started being used as a LW. Hes still goodthere, but nowhere near his best. At Koln he was immense for exanple. Dribbling defenders all day, scoring wonder goals, he carried them to two midtable finishes and then they got relegated in his third season because th defense went o shthambles. Podolski. All joking aside hes an amazing footballer. People dont realize this bexause hes not flashy. Not to mention that at Arsenal and for 2 years fot Germany hes been played out of his preferred position, and hed been struggling with injuries this season. Its no coincidence that he had a goal every other game for Germany until he started being used as a LW. Hes still goodthere, but nowhere near his best. At Koln he was immense for exanple. Dribbling defenders all day, scoring wonder goals, he carried them to two midtable finishes and then they got relegated in his third season because the defense went to shambles. Even a friend of mine who is a Leverkusen fan thinks he should start for Germany still, and i agree.

Bénin wrote:

ExtremistEnigma wrote:At this moment:

Suarez, Nani, Sanchez, Hart, Balotelli, Robben, Milner, Valdes, Gervinho

milner is not doing very well recently , at least not playing enough .

gervinho is not underrated

nani won't be any better than what we already saw .

Milner was one of City's best players last season. lol

Kick wrote:To go back to the Mata debate, He has 20 goals and 37 assists in 64 matches this season. A goal or assist every .89 games.

He is far better than Hazard or Oscar and is one of the best players in the EPL. If not the best. Only players who could be better than him is Bale, RVP and Carrick.

Suarez, Silva, Rooney etc.

Mata is good, but he's not the best.

halamadrid2 wrote:Higuain

+1

[quote="huntsman"]

Betty La Fea wrote:

huntsman wrote:Hazard from Chelsea, third best player in the world right now and is nominated to dethrone at least Ronaldo in the next couple of years.

Kaka from Madrid; second best player after Ronaldo. Madrid never loses when he starts and he scores almost every game he plays and has more assists than the likes of Ozil who despite being a flop is a starter.

Hazard isnt even the best player at Chelsea, much less the third best in the world.

Didnt Mata finish the season with like 20 goals and 30 assists? Dude is a beast.

Mata is criminally underrated.

Hazard's talent is only matched by that of Messi. Ronaldo's a machine but he doesnt have the talent to run through players and defenders like hazard has.

Only Messi is more gifted than Hazard, and only Ronaldo is more efficient.

Only Ronaldo is more EFFICIENT, by which means is he efficient his stats this year are not even half as impressive as Mata's , let alone Bale and Suarez in Premier League. To call him 3rd best player in the world is just asjfhkasdjhf ajsdhf

[quote="Luis_Suarez123"]

huntsman wrote:

Betty La Fea wrote:

Hazard isnt even the best player at Chelsea, much less the third best in the world.

Didnt Mata finish the season with like 20 goals and 30 assists? Dude is a beast.

Mata is criminally underrated.

Hazard's talent is only matched by that of Messi. Ronaldo's a machine but he doesnt have the talent to run through players and defenders like hazard has.

Only Messi is more gifted than Hazard, and only Ronaldo is more efficient.

Only Ronaldo is more EFFICIENT, by which means is he efficient his stats this year are not even half as impressive as Mata's , let alone Bale and Suarez in Premier League. To call him 3rd best player in the world is just asjfhkasdjhf ajsdhf

I'd take Gotze over Hazard without second thought, even SES. Hazard is on Oscar's/Isco's level IMO.

donttreadonred wrote:Hazard may not even be the third best player in the Premier League right now, much less the third best in the world. (Bale, Suarez, Van Persie, Silva, Yaya Toure, and Mata are all on his level or above it at the moment.)

You can argue about potential all you want. There's no doubt he has immense potential. In fact, that's exactly why Chelsea paid such a high price for him. It wasn't because he was one of the best in the world; it was because he could become one of the best in the world. That said, potential means precisely f***-all until it's realized. There are 12-year-olds on YouTube that have immense potential, but that doesn't mean they will be the next Ronaldo/Messi/Maradona/Pele.

Hazard is 22 1/2
At some point players shouldn't be considered youngsters anymore. He can definitely improve, but he doesn't have much more potential than current Mata.

free_cat wrote:

donttreadonred wrote:Hazard may not even be the third best player in the Premier League right now, much less the third best in the world. (Bale, Suarez, Van Persie, Silva, Yaya Toure, and Mata are all on his level or above it at the moment.)

You can argue about potential all you want. There's no doubt he has immense potential. In fact, that's exactly why Chelsea paid such a high price for him. It wasn't because he was one of the best in the world; it was because he could become one of the best in the world. That said, potential means precisely f***-all until it's realized. There are 12-year-olds on YouTube that have immense potential, but that doesn't mean they will be the next Ronaldo/Messi/Maradona/Pele.

Hazard is 22 1/2
At some point players shouldn't be considered youngsters anymore. He can definitely improve, but he doesn't have much more potential than current Mata.

Dat Spanish bias

EL Patron wrote:

free_cat wrote:

donttreadonred wrote:Hazard may not even be the third best player in the Premier League right now, much less the third best in the world. (Bale, Suarez, Van Persie, Silva, Yaya Toure, and Mata are all on his level or above it at the moment.)

You can argue about potential all you want. There's no doubt he has immense potential. In fact, that's exactly why Chelsea paid such a high price for him. It wasn't because he was one of the best in the world; it was because he could become one of the best in the world. That said, potential means precisely f***-all until it's realized. There are 12-year-olds on YouTube that have immense potential, but that doesn't mean they will be the next Ronaldo/Messi/Maradona/Pele.

Hazard is 22 1/2
At some point players shouldn't be considered youngsters anymore. He can definitely improve, but he doesn't have much more potential than current Mata.

Dat Spanish bias

My man Free is that last person who would carry Spanish bias. He is Catalunyan. He couldn't care less.

EL Patron wrote:

free_cat wrote:

donttreadonred wrote:Hazard may not even be the third best player in the Premier League right now, much less the third best in the world. (Bale, Suarez, Van Persie, Silva, Yaya Toure, and Mata are all on his level or above it at the moment.)

You can argue about potential all you want. There's no doubt he has immense potential. In fact, that's exactly why Chelsea paid such a high price for him. It wasn't because he was one of the best in the world; it was because he could become one of the best in the world. That said, potential means precisely f***-all until it's realized. There are 12-year-olds on YouTube that have immense potential, but that doesn't mean they will be the next Ronaldo/Messi/Maradona/Pele.

Hazard is 22 1/2
At some point players shouldn't be considered youngsters anymore. He can definitely improve, but he doesn't have much more potential than current Mata.

Dat Spanish bias

You mistake me for someone else if you think I have any kind of Spanish bias.

I agree with Valkyrja, I'd take Gotze any day of the week before Hazard.

Arquitescu wrote:

EL Patron wrote:

free_cat wrote:

Hazard is 22 1/2
At some point players shouldn't be considered youngsters anymore. He can definitely improve, but he doesn't have much more potential than current Mata.

Dat Spanish bias

My man Free is that last person who would carry Spanish bias. He is Catalunyan. He couldn't care less.

Exactly, perfectly summed up.