Controversial rule changes you would make
+25
Zealous
Error
iftikhar
fatman123
barca 2011
LeBéninois
lszanto
kiranr
Tomwin Lannister
Motogp69
BAYERN_MUNICH
CBarca
Kamikaze692
FalcaoPunch
Guliver90
Lex
kabarca
Adit
Adrian0911
che
rwo power
VanDeezNuts
LeSwagg James
BarrileteCosmico
VendettaRed07
29 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Moto you're not serious, are you?
CBarca- NEVER a Mod
- Posts : 20402
Join date : 2011-06-17
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
To an extent I am, I almost wish it was a 5 yard offside rule. I don't think someone should be punished for making a good incisive run that ended up being barely offside. I think it would open up the play of the game a little bit without turning it into a long ball fest that would follow the elimination of the offside rule completely.
I could be wrong, and I know someone will disagree, because admittedly I haven't thought this through completely to fruition and I just like the banter that comes along with proposing something like this.
I guess I believe offside calls would at least seem less egregious, and it would be easier to judge something like 5 yards more than expecting them to get calls right to mere inches.
I could be wrong, and I know someone will disagree, because admittedly I haven't thought this through completely to fruition and I just like the banter that comes along with proposing something like this.
I guess I believe offside calls would at least seem less egregious, and it would be easier to judge something like 5 yards more than expecting them to get calls right to mere inches.
Motogp69- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 3365
Join date : 2012-05-02
Age : 43
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
I would make changes in how the offside rule is implemented. Let the linesman raise the flag, but the play always goes on and then, only if a goal is scored will the offside be checked using video replays.
kiranr- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 3496
Join date : 2011-06-06
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
A fair few of the rules mentioned are already a part of futsal.
Two-touch: After the goalkeeper has touched the ball he may not touch the ball again until the opposing team has touched it or the period of play has ended(free kick, throw in etc).
Time lmits on keeper: The keeper only has 4 seconds to get rid of the ball if played back to their feet, possibly an increase in time for a bigger pitch but you get the jist, just stops timewasting.
Time stoppages: When play stops so does the counter, like people have mentioned would stop the issues with added time, whistle blows as soon as the time is up, not controlled by the referee.
Two-touch: After the goalkeeper has touched the ball he may not touch the ball again until the opposing team has touched it or the period of play has ended(free kick, throw in etc).
Time lmits on keeper: The keeper only has 4 seconds to get rid of the ball if played back to their feet, possibly an increase in time for a bigger pitch but you get the jist, just stops timewasting.
Time stoppages: When play stops so does the counter, like people have mentioned would stop the issues with added time, whistle blows as soon as the time is up, not controlled by the referee.
lszanto- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 3354
Join date : 2011-07-24
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Motogp69 wrote:To an extent I am, I almost wish it was a 5 yard offside rule. I don't think someone should be punished for making a good incisive run that ended up being barely offside. I think it would open up the play of the game a little bit without turning it into a long ball fest that would follow the elimination of the offside rule completely.
I could be wrong, and I know someone will disagree, because admittedly I haven't thought this through completely to fruition and I just like the banter that comes along with proposing something like this.
I guess I believe offside calls would at least seem less egregious, and it would be easier to judge something like 5 yards more than expecting them to get calls right to mere inches.
+ 1
Mine is : I'd allow managers to make 4 or 5 substitutions . Many might not use it but at least the possibilty is there.
no away goal or such anymore : it's pointless now as teams travel easier than before and it's also easier for their fans. The first game out of the 2 has too much impact of the second as you'll see many teams who simply park the bus when they get their so important '' away goal ''
LeBéninois- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 4030
Join date : 2011-06-09
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
I don't know if I would be a fan of that rule but I wouldn't really call it a bad one. Most of the time, it's strikers or playmakers who get fouled in the box anyways and they're all decent pk takers aren't they?BarrileteCosmico wrote:That's not a good rule, it would make bad penalty takers get tackled more often and offer no benefits.CBarca wrote:I'd think about having the player that got fouled take the penalty kick.
barca 2011- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 1755
Join date : 2011-06-07
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
I wouldn't force the player who got fouled to take the kick. What if he got hurt somewhat? That could possibly mess up the shot.
rwo power- Super Moderator
- Club Supported :
Posts : 20978
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Instead of having all this added time rubbish, just have the clock stop every time the ball goes out of play, ref calls a foul, a sub is made or any other event that holds up play takes place
fatman123- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9615
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 30
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
fatman123 wrote:Instead of having all this added time rubbish, just have the clock stop every time the ball goes out of play, ref calls a foul, a sub is made or any other event that holds up play takes place
Yeah. And the 4th refree can be in charge of that. But isn't it done that way now! Only without stopping the clock!!
iftikhar- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9347
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 52
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Letting the fouled player take the kick doesn't make sense.
I mean what if its a Handball? who takes it?
Also, a player could always pretend to be "Injured" and not take the kick.
I mean what if its a Handball? who takes it?
Also, a player could always pretend to be "Injured" and not take the kick.
Kamikaze692- Starlet
- Club Supported :
Posts : 587
Join date : 2012-11-04
Age : 32
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
+1 for penalty (and freekicks) taker being the one who has been fouled. In case the opposition has made the foul (e.g. handball) then team can decide who takes the kick.
Banning players after game based on vid replays. Most dives are easy to notice from vids and would make players think twice if it's a worth to get banned for 2-3 matches.
I would also force players who has been "injured" aka faking it and lying on the ground to go to touchline and sit there 5 mins. Would reduce a lot of the needless time playing since their team would be handicapped for 5 mins. If you are really injured you're not going to get back on field fast anyway.
I would also be tempted to reduce the amount of players on field to 10 from 11. It would open the game up on whole new level and to compensate the extra miles players have to run is to allow managers to do 1-2 subs more.
Finally, I would also remove the limit of players needed to choose for a game. So no more 7 substitute players only on bench. It's a team sport and coaches should have an option to select from all his available players to make bigger strategic moves.
Banning players after game based on vid replays. Most dives are easy to notice from vids and would make players think twice if it's a worth to get banned for 2-3 matches.
I would also force players who has been "injured" aka faking it and lying on the ground to go to touchline and sit there 5 mins. Would reduce a lot of the needless time playing since their team would be handicapped for 5 mins. If you are really injured you're not going to get back on field fast anyway.
I would also be tempted to reduce the amount of players on field to 10 from 11. It would open the game up on whole new level and to compensate the extra miles players have to run is to allow managers to do 1-2 subs more.
Finally, I would also remove the limit of players needed to choose for a game. So no more 7 substitute players only on bench. It's a team sport and coaches should have an option to select from all his available players to make bigger strategic moves.
Error- Hot Prospect
- Posts : 367
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
If a player is subbed off you can bring them back on
fatman123- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 9615
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 30
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
oh a big one for me.. if a player is rolling around on the ground feigning injury, he must not be allowed to come back on the field.
he should be sent to the hospital.
he should be sent to the hospital.
VanDeezNuts- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 5869
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Have two refs on the field instead of one.
Zealous- World Class Contributor
- Club Supported :
Posts : 16098
Join date : 2011-08-01
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
che wrote:secondly, if the play stops for a player away from the ball being "injured", said player has to sit out two minutes, 5 if medical staff have to come on the pitch
Swanhends- Fan Favorite
- Club Supported :
Posts : 8451
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Swanhends wrote:che wrote:secondly, if the play stops for a player away from the ball being "injured", said player has to sit out two minutes, 5 if medical staff have to come on the pitch
Zealous- World Class Contributor
- Club Supported :
Posts : 16098
Join date : 2011-08-01
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Zealous wrote:Swanhends wrote:che wrote:secondly, if the play stops for a player away from the ball being "injured", said player has to sit out two minutes, 5 if medical staff have to come on the pitch
RealGunner- Admin
- Club Supported :
Posts : 89513
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
No one is allowed to win a trophy until we do.
Great Leader Sprucenuce- Forum Legend
- Club Supported :
Posts : 68989
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 34
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
Winner of the threadRealGunner wrote:Zealous wrote:Swanhends wrote:
VendettaRed07- First Team
- Club Supported :
Posts : 3447
Join date : 2012-08-09
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
kiranr wrote:I would make changes in how the offside rule is implemented. Let the linesman raise the flag, but the play always goes on and then, only if a goal is scored will the offside be checked using video replays.
Nah there would be masses of incidents where an offside player gets the ball, the game continues for 30 seconds and they score. It would be a disallowed goal and minutes of time would be wasted watching parts of the game that couldn't possible result in a goal.
Terrible rule. Not every offside involves a player running through on goal.
Tomwin Lannister- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 26892
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 83
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
I would eliminate the away rule and let a game go into extra time if both teams have scored equal amount of goals over the two legs
I would also let the football association make late changes to a reffs decision if they have given the wrong card I know the reffs don't like it but it would stop tackles such as the macmanaman one. id also like them to ban repeat divers severly.
I am also a fan of the idea of the clock stopping on a foul this will stop the stupid injury time that opposition player abuse anyways by again feigning an injury
I support the idea of players sitting out for a period of time if they have gotten injured. this could possibly stop players from pretending to be injured only to come on the field straight after
I would also let the football association make late changes to a reffs decision if they have given the wrong card I know the reffs don't like it but it would stop tackles such as the macmanaman one. id also like them to ban repeat divers severly.
I am also a fan of the idea of the clock stopping on a foul this will stop the stupid injury time that opposition player abuse anyways by again feigning an injury
I support the idea of players sitting out for a period of time if they have gotten injured. this could possibly stop players from pretending to be injured only to come on the field straight after
halamadrid2- Ballon d'Or Contender
- Club Supported :
Posts : 25594
Join date : 2011-06-05
Re: Controversial rule changes you would make
halamadrid2 wrote:I would eliminate the away rule and let a game go into extra time if both teams have scored equal amount of goals over the two legs
I would also let the football association make late changes to a reffs decision if they have given the wrong card I know the reffs don't like it but it would stop tackles such as the macmanaman one. id also like them to ban repeat divers severly.
I am also a fan of the idea of the clock stopping on a foul this will stop the stupid injury time that opposition player abuse anyways by again feigning an injury
I support the idea of players sitting out for a period of time if they have gotten injured. this could possibly stop players from pretending to be injured only to come on the field straight after
I personally am a big fan of the away goal rule. It genuinely is more difficult to score away from home, in an hostile environment. The team that does score away should have an advantage IMO.
The only problem i find in this rule is Extra Time. If 2 teams are level on aggregate and on away goals after 180 mins, then the Away Goal rule should cease to exist for the subsequent 30 mins extra time.
Kamikaze692- Starlet
- Club Supported :
Posts : 587
Join date : 2012-11-04
Age : 32
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Nationalism in Europe [Controversial]
» Controversial French Joke!
» Controversial Article on Messi
» Does the EPL need its own "Rooney Rule?"
» The Lionel Messi Appreciation Thread & Fan Club
» Controversial French Joke!
» Controversial Article on Messi
» Does the EPL need its own "Rooney Rule?"
» The Lionel Messi Appreciation Thread & Fan Club
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Today at 11:25 am by Warrior
» Mbappe signs for Real Madrid.
Today at 6:50 am by Thimmy
» Paul Pogba - The resurgence
Yesterday at 6:00 pm by Warrior
» Serie A 2024/2025
Yesterday at 5:46 pm by Robespierre
» Erik Ten Hag Sack Watch
Yesterday at 7:10 am by Glory
» The Official Real Madrid Matchday Thread 24 - 25
Yesterday at 5:30 am by Clutch
» Mbappe to Real Madrid - Official
Thu Oct 03, 2024 9:55 pm by Harmonica
» The Lionel Messi Appreciation Thread & Fan Club IV
Thu Oct 03, 2024 12:33 pm by Harmonica
» MLS-thread
Thu Oct 03, 2024 6:44 am by Harmonica
» Champions League '24/25
Thu Oct 03, 2024 6:40 am by Thimmy
» General Games Discussion
Wed Oct 02, 2024 5:19 pm by Thimmy
» Premier League 2024/25
Wed Oct 02, 2024 7:48 am by Glory
» Jose Mourinho Sack Watch: Fenerbahce Edition
Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:47 pm by futbol_bill