3-5-2 or 4-3-3

by juventus101 Mon May 14, 2012 12:41 am

Which one do you guys prefer? The 3-5-2 is more stable defensively in my opinion through the center, but i dont like that we can only play with two forwards then, but Vucinic through the center is much better. But it seems like we perform better with the 3-5-2 somehow...

by Luca Mon May 14, 2012 12:47 am

Why does it have to be one or the other?
Juventus' strength has been in its flexibility

If I had to choose one, I'd say 3-5-2. I like Vucinic operating more as of a striker than a winger.

by Juventude Mon May 14, 2012 2:41 am

Flexibility is key. Juventus's greatest strength this season was its ability to change formations and players based on the opponent.

by The_ItalianFool Mon May 14, 2012 12:24 pm

Both.

by juvealbanian Mon May 14, 2012 3:09 pm

Both,
3-5-2 is perfect to use against strong and offensive opponents,4-3-3 is better against smaller teams with weak defense.

by Loventus Mon May 14, 2012 3:27 pm

Depending on the opponent. I like both.

The 3-5-2 suits most of the players, like Bonucci, Vucinic, De Ceglie etc. but it has some players that doesn't suit it like Lichtsteiner who is most effective when partnering another Right-Winger (Pepe).

I like both and both are effective. Forza don Conte.

by Juventude Mon May 14, 2012 4:58 pm

Loventus wrote:Depending on the opponent. I like both.

The 3-5-2 suits most of the players, like Bonucci, Vucinic, De Ceglie etc. but it has some players that doesn't suit it like Lichtsteiner who is most effective when partnering another Right-Winger (Pepe).

I like both and both are effective. Forza don Conte.

I actually disagree with the Licht part. He has improved immensely as the season has progressed in the 3-5-2. I think the problem with the 3-5-2 is when we have to make a substitution for PDC or Licht because our reserves are not ideal wing backs. Caceres crosses when playing on the right side are inconsistent.

by Sponsored content

3-5-2 or 4-3-3

3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3

Re: 3-5-2 or 4-3-3